Jump to content

Lets discuss other teams weaknesses for T20 Wc 2022


Recommended Posts

Posted

Group 1 


AFG - batting and fielding 

Aus - none worth mentioning 

Eng - none worth mentioning (as it is likely to play per the strengths of its available players) 

NZ - none worth mentioning 

SL - batting relatively 

 

 

Group 2 


BD - batting and bowling relatively (depends on selected players) 

IND - top 3, bowling, and fielding 

PAK - middle order

SA - Bauvma (unless he strikes form)

WI - bowling relatively (however ca. surprise)

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

u dont think their batting is weak ?


Depends on form of some of the players as WI can bat deep 

 

PS WI plays qualifiers as well so an opportunity for its batsmen to get into shape too 

Edited by zen
Posted
9 hours ago, zen said:

SL - batting relatively 

 

i was just thinking which group is SL in, chalo kisi ek team ka to ye kaam kharab karenge with their bowling 

what are their venues ?

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

i was just thinking which group is SL in, chalo kisi ek team ka to ye kaam kharab karenge with their bowling 

what are their venues ?


SL and WI groups are not decided. But if they wil their respective qualifier groups, they will be in Grp 1 & 2 respectively. 
 

As for venues, most teams will play at 4 venues, where at one of them, they would play 2 games. 

Edited by zen
Posted
27 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

i was just thinking which group is SL in, chalo kisi ek team ka to ye kaam kharab karenge with their bowling 

what are their venues ?

SL in Group 1 will be tough for them...  They should fluke a loss somehow in qualifiers to be in Group 2 with India/Pak. 

Their batters play pace & bounce well & their bowling is strong with Both Chameera & Kumara there.  Kumara was super impressive vs Aus in Aus last time.  Spinners are acuurate & are a good fielding unit. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

England - No archer 


Not a weakness (can’t do much about injured players and he has been out for long). More like strength diluted but Eng is likely to work around that to add relatively depth to its batting. 

Posted
9 hours ago, zen said:


Not a weakness (can’t do much about injured players and he has been out for long). More like strength diluted but Eng is likely to work around that to add relatively depth to its batting. 

when u loose an all phase bowler like archer-bumrah who also miser with runs teams have change their plans . England have struggled with their death bowling in previouys Wcs  too 

Posted

Aus : looking best but maybe batting v spin.

Eng : bowling specially death bowling.

SA : Not optimum squad due to quota. Bavuma,Ngidi taking up spots over other more deserving ones.

NZ : Not used to big grounds.Middle order batting

Pak : Middle order

SL : Batting v pace and bounce

Afg : Batting,fielding

WI : Bowling, prone to choking under pressure.

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

when u loose an all phase bowler like archer-bumrah who also miser with runs teams have change their plans . England have struggled with their death bowling in previouys Wcs  too 


You can’t do much about that. Eng is more batting focused side so a relatively less fancy bowling can help it to get its focus on batting out other teams more strong. 
 

Posted
9 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

SL in Group 1 will be tough for them...  They should fluke a loss somehow in qualifiers to be in Group 2 with India/Pak. 

Their batters play pace & bounce well & their bowling is strong with Both Chameera & Kumara there.  Kumara was super impressive vs Aus in Aus last time.  Spinners are acuurate & are a good fielding unit. 

ur forgetting madhushanka , any left hander bringing the ball back in will trouble most right handers in world cricket . 

such bowling attacks need 150 runs to make a game out of it or if total is 150  which their bowling can stop opposition then avg teams can chase it down 

Posted
9 hours ago, Lord said:

WI : Bowling, prone to choking under pressure.

batting-bowling dono hai unki

their batsman arent very good against high pace , upar se lambe grounds have been always a problem for them 

Posted

India:

  • Lack of Pace in Bowling Attack (could be rectified if Shami picked, Hardik if he hits the deck with pace)
  • Underachieve/Choke in ICC events since 2014 World T20
  • Spinners are not wicket takers, Y Chahal is a bit risky as cannot bat

Pakistan:

  • Non-existent middle order
  • Short ball weakness, will be shown up in Aus more clearly
  • Bits and pieces all rounders

South Africa:

  • Underachieve/Choke in ICC events
  • Picking players based on colour of skin, not always playing the best possible 11

West Indies:

  • Poor batting techniques, too reliant on brute force
  • Bits and pieces all rounders
  • Poor quality in both batting and bowling 

England:

  • Bowling tends to get hammered more often
  • Batting approach is all out attack, can fail occasionally

New Zealand:

  • Nothing great but tend to get into ICC finals

Sri Lanka:

  • Nothing great

Australia:

  • Home team pressure & no team has won back to back World T20 World Cups

 

 

 

 

Posted

I have a few doubts about Pakistani bowling too. 

All their bowlers are very talented but at some point against good batting side they will come under pressure. England reserves were able to him them for 200+ easily. They lack experience of Amir and Junaid. I think one of them should have been in the team.

Posted
9 hours ago, Lord said:

SA : Not optimum squad due to quota. Bavuma,Ngidi taking up spots over other more deserving ones.

 rabada number are also not great if u dig through them they are quite avg specially by his stature 

 

Rabada avg is 27 and eco 8.42 .............Ngidi avg is atleast 18 

 

In pp - he avg 33.5 and eco 7.94 .............if  take a spinner like ashwin his eco and avg are better in PP then Rabada 

in middle he avg 42 eco 8.67 (this is supposed to be his strongest phase)

in death eco is 9.35 (which ok but for his level its not good)

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...