Jump to content

Domestic quadrilateral test tournament


vayuu1

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What does ICF think about it ,a tournament between top 4  domestic teams of their countries say a Ranji champion vs Sheffield sheild champion vs county champion vs say NZ domestic or sa domestic champion,i feel it will help our domestic cricket as it will give them more exposure the finalists play at a neutral venue only the top four international test teams domestic team can qualify hence it will push the test team to play better,i also believe we should have drs, Hawkeye for ranji,irani,sma and duleep trophy whats icfers think about this 

Edited by vayuu1
Posted
10 minutes ago, express bowling said:

I would prefer it between the A-teams of the top 4 countries.

That happens isnt it,see many domestic players are not part of A setup, international or ipl team either so with this they will have a feel of international cricket, this will also motivate younger players also when you play at neutral venue you get the idea of what their pitches look like 

Posted
9 minutes ago, vayuu1 said:

That happens isnt it,see many domestic players are not part of A setup, international or ipl team either so with this they will have a feel of international cricket, this will also motivate younger players also when you play at neutral venue you get the idea of what their pitches look like 

 

 

Most players, in the Teams that become Ranji Champions, are not good enough for international cricket.

 

It's better to give international cricket exposure to those who have a good chance of representing India in the future. 

 

4 team Unofficial Test tournament will mean quite a few matches in a year and this does not happen. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Most players, in the Teams that become Ranji Champions, are not good enough for international cricket.

 

It's better to give international cricket exposure to those who have a good chance of representing India in the future. 

 

4 team Unofficial Test tournament will mean quite a few matches in a year and this does not happen. 

To isiliye to ye hona chahiye ki teams know where they stand at international level also this is to improve domestic cricket,when you play them u get the idea of their style of play their training everything,also make it a 3 match affair rank 1 team plays rank 3 team and rank 2 team play rank 4 team,make it a two year affair instead of every year,also one thing that can be done is higher ranked teams get to play in their home country but not at their home ground and finals to be played at a neutral venue.

Posted
22 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Most players, in the Teams that become Ranji Champions, are not good enough for international cricket.

 

It's better to give international cricket exposure to those who have a good chance of representing India in the future. 

 

4 team Unofficial Test tournament will mean quite a few matches in a year and this does not happen. 

 so to summarise our 'famed' domestic cricket structure produces duds... on what basis are we a cricket powerhouse? Based on the stupid fanaticism of Indian fans who watch tv as they have nothing better to do in their life

Posted
2 hours ago, LordPrabhzy said:

 so to summarise our 'famed' domestic cricket structure produces duds... on what basis are we a cricket powerhouse? Based on the stupid fanaticism of Indian fans who watch tv as they have nothing better to do in their life

 

One or two top players from a few good Ranji sides can form a Top Team India. 

 

And most Team India players then stop playing Ranji.

 

Only a few emerging players remain scattered across teams. Don't forget that there are 38 Ranji Teams. 

 

The Ranji Champion may have just 1 or 2 international class players, if that, but still Team India gets its required players from many such teams. 


 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, vayuu1 said:

What does ICF think about it ,a tournament between top 4  domestic teams of their countries say a Ranji champion vs Sheffield sheild champion vs county champion vs say NZ domestic or sa domestic champion,i feel it will help our domestic cricket as it will give them more exposure the finalists play at a neutral venue only the top four international test teams domestic team can qualify hence it will push the test team to play better,i also believe we should have drs, Hawkeye for ranji,irani,sma and duleep trophy whats icfers think about this 

It is very good idea. venue could be rotated every two years. Ranji trophy players will great incentive along with other teams.

 

Indian test players or India A players are getting enough exposure.

Posted (edited)

There is too much cricket already ... and there may not be too many takers of such cricket outside India where anything on cricket can be expected to be followed 

 

It can be feasible if current tours such as of A teams are worked into such a competition/league. Where a group of teams play against each other on a home and away basis over a period of 2-4 years. 

Edited by zen
Posted
9 hours ago, Chakdephatte said:

There is Deodhar trophy @vayuu1

Last happened before Covid I guess.

Also, Duleep trophy which has best teams from four different zones. Their selections are mostly poor though.

deodhar, challenger, irani, and duleep trophies were all useful. now most are non-functional or sporadic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...