Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rahane looked finished , so did Dube but they have looked very impressive with CSK. Is it Fleming working his magic.

 

We cannot say it is Dhoni because Rahane played under Dhoni and cost India couple atlleast one T20 cup.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

Washington made Mukesh look like a world beater.

 

What is the batsman equivalent of a trundler?

how? check his strike rate. it is 160. you cannot blame him for poor batting of others who struggled to bat at 100 SR.

Posted
Just now, vvvslaxman said:

3 proper yorkers

and bowled at good pace too.

 

Mukesh Kumar to Sundar, 2 runs

Full and wide on seventh stump at 138 kph, punches this wide of the cover sweeper for a jogged two.

 

Mukesh Kumar to Sundar, no run

Wide yorker on sixth stump at 139 kph, Sundar tries to open the face to guide this to third man but misses.

 

Low full toss on the ankles at 141 kph, flicked out tamely to deep midwicket for one.

Posted
Just now, rkt.india said:

and bowled at good pace too.

 

Mukesh Kumar to Sundar, 2 runs

Full and wide on seventh stump at 138 kph, punches this wide of the cover sweeper for a jogged two.

 

Mukesh Kumar to Sundar, no run

Wide yorker on sixth stump at 139 kph, Sundar tries to open the face to guide this to third man but misses.

 

Low full toss on the ankles at 141 kph, flicked out tamely to deep midwicket for one.

You have to be in the zone. These are very long boundaries. Over 70 meter.  He didn't miss even a single ball like we saw with lot of bowlers who dished out full tosses in death.  Credit to him.

Posted
1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

how? check his strike rate. it is 160. you cannot blame him for poor batting of others who struggled to bat at 100 SR.

That is the fallacy, finishers are forced to hit from ball one so anyone will have over 120 SR if they face 10 plus deliveries. So 160 SR is not a big deal which you can get by squeezing in couple of boundaries .

 

 

Posted

Yet another small chase getting screwed by this mentality of being too conservative in stroke play. High time teams start approaching small targets aggressively like they would do for say a target of 170-180. 

Posted
Just now, Under_Score said:

Sunny G himself was never under any pressure to win test matches during his time, he played out 2 to 3 crucial match days for his century or Double. That's why test matches in the past were mostly boring draws :wp3:

 

To Sunny's credit, he did lead India to the word series championship in 1985. He even dropped himself down the order, and after the tournament gave up the captaincy. 

 

Maybe should have continued till 1987 as we were stuck with the formulaic captaincy of Kapil. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, putrevus said:

12 runs to get with wickets in hand in last over, batting side should win the match unless they screw it up which they did today.

They screwed it up to that point by top and Mo.. With Nortje bowling it was always going to be tricky. They sent Klassen far too late. Also Tripathi did not create any tempo.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Texan said:

Yet another small chase getting screwed by this mentality of being too conservative in stroke play. High time teams start approaching small targets aggressively like they would do for say a target of 170-180. 

Yes powerplay  is where you kill the chase. Chasing 12 an over for last 5 overs onnthisbgeound is tough. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

Did anyone see Kuldeep's 117 kph delivery? It came out of nowhere. I've seen him do that before too. Good weapon to have.

He showed that in the last IPL too. That is when e gave some  confidence.

Posted
17 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

They screwed it up to that point by top and Mo.. With Nortje bowling it was always going to be tricky. They sent Klassen far too late. Also Tripathi did not create any tempo.

I am not saying that top order did well. Still I would back team to score 12 runs in last over that too with just 4 fielders.

 

Sundar could not put bat on ball.Nor he had power to clear ropes.He made Mukesh's bowling better than it acutally was, 5 runs in last over that is completely on the finisher?

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I am not saying that top order did well. Still I would back team to score 12 runs in last over that too with just 4 fielders.

 

Sundar could not put bat on ball.Nor he had power to clear ropes.He made Mukesh's bowling better than it acutally was, 5 runs in last over that is completely on the finisher?

 

 

They protected one side with wide Yorkers.  It is a huge ground. 140k Yorkers cannot be smashed by any one. One of his 4 would have been a certain six at Chinnaseamy, wankhede. Credit to him for landing them well. 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

They protected one side with wide Yorkers.  It is a huge ground. 140k Yorkers cannot be smashed by any one. One of his 4 would have been a certain six at Chinnaseamy, wankhede. Credit to him for landing them well. 

I don't think so, it is batsman who has to put the pressure on bowler, Sundar flopped miserably.

 

Rahul played out a maiden to start with, it does not mean bowler bowled an exceptional over, it is Rahul who is an useless fellow who let bowler bowl 6 dots.

 

 

Edited by putrevus
×
×
  • Create New...