Lord Posted June 19, 2023 Share Posted June 19, 2023 3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: True. But Shakib started as an all rounder if i am right. Jaddu started as a batsman Then became a bowler in international later became a full fledged all rounder like scoring 100s even big 100s. Shakib batted mostly at 5 or 6 batting position. Jadeja played a lot of matches at no.8 and no.9. 22 and 11 respectively Later moved to 7th. He was always good bat in FC. Batting position is wrt teams. Jadeja even then could bat at 6-7 for team like BD Vijy 1 Link to comment
Majestic Posted June 19, 2023 Author Share Posted June 19, 2023 (edited) A great player must stood up against the very best team of their generation. Why is Shane Bond rated so high? He has produced spells that has destroyed the Australian batting lineup of early 200s. If we look at performance of 80s golden quarter vs the GOAT Windies team, Kapil Dev really stood out as the best. In one of the games in 1983 vs Windies, he picked 9 freaking wickets vs the legendary team. Imagine picking 9 out of 10 wickets vs a GOAT team like Windies, that's greatness right there - http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard.asp?MatchCode=0966 Not only this, he has also picked 8-fers for a couple of times as well where again he was the one who single handedly was carrying Indian bowling and that too vs top teams like Pakistan or against the AB led Aussies at Adelaide. http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard.asp?MatchCode=0947 http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard.asp?MatchCode=1032 Edited June 19, 2023 by Majestic vvvslaxman and putrevus 2 Link to comment
zen Posted June 19, 2023 Share Posted June 19, 2023 (edited) I only rate 3 players as ATG world all-rounders: Sobers = best batting AR Hadlee = best bowling AR Imran = best balanced AR * Gilchrist = best WK AR (special mention; sometimes I wonder what he would have averaged if he had played as a specialist batsman only) If the above 3 are not available: Kallis for batting at #3-4 and as 4th seamer Stokes for batting at #5-6 and as 4th seamer Procter for bowling and to bat at #7-9 Pre-1960 ARs: Mankad for a balanced spin bowling AR (apart from Mankad not interested in any spin bowling AR at the moment) Miller for a relatively balanced pace bowling AR Other ARs that may interest me esp for national 11s: Pollock for bowling and to bat at #7-9 Flintoff for a relatively balanced AR as 3rd-4th seamer & #7-8 batsman Botham for batting at #6-7 and as 3rd-4th seamer Kapil for bowling as 3rd-4th seamer & #8 batsman (Mankad would be there at #7) Players that can be fitted as ARs: Marshall who is like a mini-AR (would be in the team as the main strike bowler anyways) S Waugh for his bowling if required (likely to be in the team at #5 where he has played over 100 tests) Akram for his lower-order batting (likely to be in the team if a left-arm pace option is needed) Edited June 19, 2023 by zen Link to comment
Majestic Posted June 19, 2023 Author Share Posted June 19, 2023 26 minutes ago, Lord said: Pollock was ATG bowler but as a bat didnt too much. As an AR he can be called country great only not ATG. You just deducted his status from bowler to all rounder. Not as good a bat as Botham, Imran, Kapil, Cairns, Flintoff, Jadeja but still better than Hadlee, Ashwin, Vettori. Its a tough call but I would count him as all rounder nevertheless. He batted at 7 very often. Link to comment
Vijy Posted June 19, 2023 Share Posted June 19, 2023 2 hours ago, Majestic said: You just deducted his status from bowler to all rounder. Not as good a bat as Botham, Imran, Kapil, Cairns, Flintoff, Jadeja but still better than Hadlee, Ashwin, Vettori. Its a tough call but I would count him as all rounder nevertheless. He batted at 7 very often. he could have batted higher 8 or 9, but SA had too many ARs who were (slightly or much) better bats: Zulu, kallis, mcMillan, cronje (for LOIs) Link to comment
zen Posted June 20, 2023 Share Posted June 20, 2023 (edited) Home and Away stats for the 4 ARs of the 70s-80s: Imran Home Batting avg 45 Bowling avg 19 Avg diff 26 Away Batting avg 34 Bowling avg 26 Avg diff 8 Hadlee Home Batting avg 29 Bowling avg 23 Avg diff 6 Away Batting avg 25 Bowling avg 22 Avg diff 3 Botham Home Batting avg 35 Bowling avg 28 Avg diff 7 Away Batting avg 32 Bowling avg 30 Avg diff 2 Kapil Home Batting avg 37 Bowling avg 26 Avg diff 11 Away Batting avg 26 Bowling avg 33 Avg diff -7 (Kapil is lucky to be tagged in this group in Tests based on mainly "home" performances, and bundling ODIs) PS Proctor did not get to play enough or he could have been closer to Imran & Hadlee. Edited June 20, 2023 by zen Link to comment
Lord Posted June 20, 2023 Share Posted June 20, 2023 20 hours ago, Majestic said: You just deducted his status from bowler to all rounder. Not as good a bat as Botham, Imran, Kapil, Cairns, Flintoff, Jadeja but still better than Hadlee, Ashwin, Vettori. Its a tough call but I would count him as all rounder nevertheless. He batted at 7 very often. Hadlee,Ashwin,Vettori aren't ATG allrounders too. Only ATG bowlers. Not even that for Vettori They won't make the team on batting alone while Kapil,Jaddu,Botham would. Link to comment
zen Posted June 20, 2023 Share Posted June 20, 2023 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Lord said: Hadlee,Ashwin,Vettori aren't ATG allrounders too. FYI, Hadlee improved his batting in the 80s: Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0 JF Reid (NZ) 1981-1986 18 29 3 1277 180 49.11 6 2 3 M Amarnath (IND) 1982-1988 43 68 7 2912 138 47.73 9 15 6 DB Vengsarkar (IND) 1980-1989 71 112 16 4501 166 46.88 12 22 7 M Azharuddin (IND) 1984-1989 34 51 3 2224 199 46.33 7 9 2 SM Gavaskar (IND) 1980-1987 65 106 9 4475 236* 46.13 12 20 6 MD Crowe (NZ) 1982-1989 45 76 7 3127 188 45.31 10 11 7 JV Coney (NZ) 1980-1987 45 73 14 2303 174* 39.03 3 14 3 SM Patil (IND) 1980-1984 29 47 4 1588 174 36.93 4 7 4 JG Wright (NZ) 1980-1989 56 100 4 3271 141 34.07 7 13 4 RJ Shastri (IND) 1981-1989 69 104 14 3036 142 33.73 8 11 9 K Srikkanth (IND) 1981-1989 39 64 3 1927 123 31.59 2 12 6 BA Edgar (NZ) 1980-1986 33 57 4 1662 161 31.35 2 11 5 Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ) 1980-1989 53 80 14 2040 151* 30.90 2 10 7 N Kapil Dev (IND) 1980-1989 80 118 9 3353 163 30.76 5 17 11 Yashpal Sharma (IND) 1980-1983 24 40 7 1015 140 30.75 1 5 2 GP Howarth (NZ) 1980-1985 30 51 2 1491 147 30.42 2 8 3 GR Viswanath (IND) 1980-1983 25 39 1 1135 222 29.86 3 5 4 JJ Crowe (NZ) 1983-1989 38 64 4 1592 128 26.53 3 6 6 SMH Kirmani (IND) 1980-1986 49 67 13 1399 102 25.90 1 6 4 IDS Smith (NZ) 1980-1989 49 70 15 1376 113* 25.01 1 5 7 If Hadlee had played for India, he would be Ind's best AR by a mile. Note that he was also much older than Kapil. In 1989, Hadlee would have been 37-38, while Kapil, who mostly leveraged at home, would have been 30 (and kept going downhill). Outside of home in the 80s: Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0 M Amarnath (IND) 1982-1986 20 34 5 1967 138 67.82 8 10 0 SV Manjrekar (IND) 1989-1989 8 13 1 769 218 64.08 3 3 1 SM Patil (IND) 1981-1984 14 23 2 995 174 47.38 3 6 2 JF Reid (NZ) 1984-1985 9 15 0 644 180 42.93 3 1 1 MD Crowe (NZ) 1983-1989 25 44 4 1680 188 42.00 4 6 4 AH Jones (NZ) 1987-1988 7 13 0 517 150 39.76 1 2 0 SM Gavaskar (IND) 1981-1986 31 52 4 1825 172 38.02 4 8 3 DB Vengsarkar (IND) 1981-1989 35 59 8 1880 157 36.86 3 12 5 JV Coney (NZ) 1980-1986 22 37 6 1043 92 33.64 0 8 1 M Azharuddin (IND) 1985-1989 16 26 2 807 109 33.62 1 5 2 JG Wright (NZ) 1980-1989 29 54 1 1768 119 33.35 2 9 4 RJ Shastri (IND) 1981-1989 32 52 7 1395 139 31.00 4 4 6 Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ) 1980-1988 27 45 8 1138 151* 30.75 1 6 3 BA Edgar (NZ) 1980-1986 16 29 1 810 84 28.92 0 9 3 GP Howarth (NZ) 1980-1985 13 24 0 664 84 27.66 0 6 1 K Srikkanth (IND) 1983-1989 15 26 0 708 116 27.23 1 3 2 Yashpal Sharma (IND) 1981-1983 14 24 5 514 63* 27.05 0 3 1 JJ Crowe (NZ) 1983-1989 23 39 2 966 120* 26.10 2 4 4 GR Viswanath (IND) 1981-1983 15 24 1 600 114 26.08 1 4 3 N Kapil Dev (IND) 1981-1989 39 60 4 1452 100* 25.92 1 8 7 IDS Smith (NZ) 1980-1989 26 41 6 715 79 20.42 0 3 4 SMH Kirmani (IND) 1981-1986 25 34 3 607 78 19.58 0 3 1 JG Bracewell (NZ) 1980-1988 24 37 7 570 110 19.00 1 2 9 Edited June 20, 2023 by zen Link to comment
Lord Posted June 20, 2023 Share Posted June 20, 2023 1 hour ago, zen said: FYI, Hadlee improved his batting in the 80s: Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0 JF Reid (NZ) 1981-1986 18 29 3 1277 180 49.11 6 2 3 M Amarnath (IND) 1982-1988 43 68 7 2912 138 47.73 9 15 6 DB Vengsarkar (IND) 1980-1989 71 112 16 4501 166 46.88 12 22 7 M Azharuddin (IND) 1984-1989 34 51 3 2224 199 46.33 7 9 2 SM Gavaskar (IND) 1980-1987 65 106 9 4475 236* 46.13 12 20 6 MD Crowe (NZ) 1982-1989 45 76 7 3127 188 45.31 10 11 7 JV Coney (NZ) 1980-1987 45 73 14 2303 174* 39.03 3 14 3 SM Patil (IND) 1980-1984 29 47 4 1588 174 36.93 4 7 4 JG Wright (NZ) 1980-1989 56 100 4 3271 141 34.07 7 13 4 RJ Shastri (IND) 1981-1989 69 104 14 3036 142 33.73 8 11 9 K Srikkanth (IND) 1981-1989 39 64 3 1927 123 31.59 2 12 6 BA Edgar (NZ) 1980-1986 33 57 4 1662 161 31.35 2 11 5 Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ) 1980-1989 53 80 14 2040 151* 30.90 2 10 7 N Kapil Dev (IND) 1980-1989 80 118 9 3353 163 30.76 5 17 11 Yashpal Sharma (IND) 1980-1983 24 40 7 1015 140 30.75 1 5 2 GP Howarth (NZ) 1980-1985 30 51 2 1491 147 30.42 2 8 3 GR Viswanath (IND) 1980-1983 25 39 1 1135 222 29.86 3 5 4 JJ Crowe (NZ) 1983-1989 38 64 4 1592 128 26.53 3 6 6 SMH Kirmani (IND) 1980-1986 49 67 13 1399 102 25.90 1 6 4 IDS Smith (NZ) 1980-1989 49 70 15 1376 113* 25.01 1 5 7 If Hadlee had played for India, he would be Ind's best AR by a mile. Note that he was also much older than Kapil. In 1989, Hadlee would have been 37-38, while Kapil, who mostly leveraged at home, would have been 30 (and kept going downhill). Outside of home in the 80s: Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0 M Amarnath (IND) 1982-1986 20 34 5 1967 138 67.82 8 10 0 SV Manjrekar (IND) 1989-1989 8 13 1 769 218 64.08 3 3 1 SM Patil (IND) 1981-1984 14 23 2 995 174 47.38 3 6 2 JF Reid (NZ) 1984-1985 9 15 0 644 180 42.93 3 1 1 MD Crowe (NZ) 1983-1989 25 44 4 1680 188 42.00 4 6 4 AH Jones (NZ) 1987-1988 7 13 0 517 150 39.76 1 2 0 SM Gavaskar (IND) 1981-1986 31 52 4 1825 172 38.02 4 8 3 DB Vengsarkar (IND) 1981-1989 35 59 8 1880 157 36.86 3 12 5 JV Coney (NZ) 1980-1986 22 37 6 1043 92 33.64 0 8 1 M Azharuddin (IND) 1985-1989 16 26 2 807 109 33.62 1 5 2 JG Wright (NZ) 1980-1989 29 54 1 1768 119 33.35 2 9 4 RJ Shastri (IND) 1981-1989 32 52 7 1395 139 31.00 4 4 6 Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ) 1980-1988 27 45 8 1138 151* 30.75 1 6 3 BA Edgar (NZ) 1980-1986 16 29 1 810 84 28.92 0 9 3 GP Howarth (NZ) 1980-1985 13 24 0 664 84 27.66 0 6 1 K Srikkanth (IND) 1983-1989 15 26 0 708 116 27.23 1 3 2 Yashpal Sharma (IND) 1981-1983 14 24 5 514 63* 27.05 0 3 1 JJ Crowe (NZ) 1983-1989 23 39 2 966 120* 26.10 2 4 4 GR Viswanath (IND) 1981-1983 15 24 1 600 114 26.08 1 4 3 N Kapil Dev (IND) 1981-1989 39 60 4 1452 100* 25.92 1 8 7 IDS Smith (NZ) 1980-1989 26 41 6 715 79 20.42 0 3 4 SMH Kirmani (IND) 1981-1986 25 34 3 607 78 19.58 0 3 1 JG Bracewell (NZ) 1980-1988 24 37 7 570 110 19.00 1 2 9 Can't look at fraction of career. Otherwise Kapil was very good for first half of his career. Hadlee scored 2 tons in 86 Tests. Thats too low to be rated as ATG AR. Bowling he definitely was an ATG and much better than Dev Link to comment
zen Posted June 20, 2023 Share Posted June 20, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Lord said: Can't look at fraction of career. Otherwise Kapil was very good for first half of his career. Hadlee scored 2 tons in 86 Tests. Thats too low to be rated as ATG AR. Bowling he definitely was an ATG and much better than Dev Below are the career stats (as posted in one of the posts above): Hadlee Home Batting avg 29 Bowling avg 23 Avg diff 6 Away Batting avg 25 Bowling avg 22 Avg diff 3 Kapil Home Batting avg 37 Bowling avg 26 Avg diff 11 Away Batting avg 26 Bowling avg 33 Avg diff -7 (Kapil is lucky to be tagged in this group in Tests based on mainly "home" performances, and bundling ODIs) If Hadlee batted more in subcon, his batting average could have been similar (if not higher than Kapil's. He has a 151* in SL iirc). Edited June 20, 2023 by zen Link to comment
Majestic Posted June 20, 2023 Author Share Posted June 20, 2023 Can Pandya take a 9-fer vs this Australia team like Kapil did vs the great Windies in 1983? http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard.asp?MatchCode=0966 raki05 1 Link to comment
zen Posted June 20, 2023 Share Posted June 20, 2023 These Kapil fanboys have lost their mind ... the more they try, the more they fail The resort to ad hominem, drag irrelevant players, etc. In short, act as if social media is their mohalla in India and everyone lives like them Link to comment
Majestic Posted June 20, 2023 Author Share Posted June 20, 2023 (edited) This thread is about all rounders so while talking about one bowling A/R, the other all rounders from same nation can be used as a reference. For example when talking about Lyon, people will mention the likes of Warne or Todd Murphy. Ofcourse those just posting for the sake of trolling will find it hard to repel back due to lack of effective content. Edited June 20, 2023 by Majestic raki05 1 Link to comment
wazza Posted June 21, 2023 Share Posted June 21, 2023 On 6/19/2023 at 12:01 AM, zen said: It would depend on who can get into an 11. If the bowling attack has Marshall, Ambrose, Hadlee/Imran, & Warne, as the AR option (or one more AR) who can be the 5th bowler: Ben Stokes as he is rated among the best players under pressure Pollock for his pace bowling or Ian Botham for his batting Shakib or Jadeja if another spinner is needed who can bat a bit Cairns or Kapil (At this point, would prefer to play someone like Akram as an AR) PS Undoubtedly its imran khan or kalis. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted June 21, 2023 Share Posted June 21, 2023 On 6/18/2023 at 7:31 PM, vvvslaxman said: Kapil/Botham could walk in purely as a batsman and also purely as a bowler. Shakib can do as well given the team he plays for. He has done it if i reemember. Not sure Jaddu will walk in without one of the bot skills. Pollock was more a bowling all rounder. Ben Stokes is never going to walk in as a bowler alone. Dont think kapil was good enough purely as a batsman. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted June 21, 2023 Share Posted June 21, 2023 9 hours ago, Majestic said: Can Pandya take a 9-fer vs this Australia team like Kapil did vs the great Windies in 1983? http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard.asp?MatchCode=0966 Kapil was a bowler first. Pandya is a batsman first whether he is good or not in current cricket is a different discussion. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted June 21, 2023 Share Posted June 21, 2023 On 6/20/2023 at 1:22 AM, Majestic said: You just deducted his status from bowler to all rounder. Not as good a bat as Botham, Imran, Kapil, Cairns, Flintoff, Jadeja but still better than Hadlee, Ashwin, Vettori. Its a tough call but I would count him as all rounder nevertheless. He batted at 7 very often. Ashwin and Pollock are similar batsmen. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted June 21, 2023 Share Posted June 21, 2023 21 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Dont think kapil was good enough purely as a batsman. He was. He was as good as specialist. In some matches better than them. He was the original bazballer. Probably lost 10 points of average due to that. Very decisive player against both spin and exterme pace. Link to comment
Rightarmfast Posted June 21, 2023 Share Posted June 21, 2023 Kapil Botham Pollock Jadeja Shakib Purely as an allrounder and a clutch player, for me Kapil aces Botham. Remember, Kapil had the burden of carrying his whole team, Botham had great support. Even otherwise, the longetivity factor comes into play. Pollock was a great player, however cannot be placed as a pure allrounder for the entirety of his career. He was a great bowler in the first half of his career, and then it just went downhill to a point where he was treated like Joginder Sharma by opposition batsmen. Stats dont tell the whole story. You have to watch a player live and the impact they have. I am afraid, Kapil had huge impact. Imran's stats cannot be taken seriously because- majority of the matches were played in Pakistan where the umpiring was horrible. B- Ball tampering. As much respect I have for Imran, his stats in Pakistan and outside have huge difference and one can see it if he/ she does a match by match analysis. raki05 1 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted June 21, 2023 Share Posted June 21, 2023 12 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said: Kapil Botham Pollock Jadeja Shakib Purely as an allrounder and a clutch player, for me Kapil aces Botham. Remember, Kapil had the burden of carrying his whole team, Botham had great support. Even otherwise, the longetivity factor comes into play. Pollock was a great player, however cannot be placed as a pure allrounder for the entirety of his career. He was a great bowler in the first half of his career, and then it just went downhill to a point where he was treated like Joginder Sharma by opposition batsmen. Stats dont tell the whole story. You have to watch a player live and the impact they have. I am afraid, Kapil had huge impact. Imran's stats cannot be taken seriously because- majority of the matches were played in Pakistan where the umpiring was horrible. B- Ball tampering. As much respect I have for Imran, his stats in Pakistan and outside have huge difference and one can see it if he/ she does a match by match analysis. Sarfraz started this tampering. Imran caught on to it. First 30 tests or so Imran was averaging 30. Then his average gradually reduced. Rampant ball tampering, extremely biased umpiring. raki05 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now