Jump to content

I didn’t miss Kohli. Didn’t miss Rohit either.


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

I am speaking from his legacy-perspective, not the team's. The team and fans should beg him to stay. That's how you retire.

Fans of Lohli are so brain dead that they cannot distinguish formats... they confuse his IPL form with international cricket 

Posted
22 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

 

Jadeja should retire from tests, too. He is at the top. One of the MVPs of this series, albeit as a batter.

 

If he retires now, his legacy is etched in glory forever.

 

With Sundar already established. Team India can start developing Kotian, Dubey, Sutar, Sai Kishore for the future as another spin-allrounder. 

That's a selfish way to look at things. If he can contribute to the team should stay. Don't forget youngsters need some guidance in initial years too. We don't have spin bowling coach either 

Posted

Absolutely.  No one missed them. Except for their fan clubs, who kept downplaying this team from day 1, and are still at it giving excuses of flat wicket, poor England side etc.

 

Dare I say this performance also will put them under pressure for ODIs. Gill, Jaiswal, Sai, Iyer, Rahul,

Hardik, Parag, Axar, Washi/ NKR,  Kuldeep, Arshdeep, Harshit, Prasidh, Varun with Bumrah and Siraj mostly resting is a good enough combo. The generational transition has kicked off after the drawn series.

 

How motivated will Rohit and Kohli be for say bilateral ODIs vs WI, SL, Afg, or even vs Aus, SA, Eng, NZ when most sides don't pick their best 11s for ODIs. Can't see them going beyond a home ODI series or two.

Posted
3 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

 

This is the bane of Indian cricket (maybe other teams too, but I don't care about them). Star players tarnishing their own legacy by hanging on well-past their shelf-life.

Bullshit, none of the earlier players hung on this long as Kohli did. Players like ponting hung on for way longer than dravid, Sehwag, Sachin, ganguly yet no Aussie calls it tarnishing legacies 

 

2 hours ago, Vickydev said:

 

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Vickydev said:

Didn't miss Bumrah. Seriously if someone has to pick and choose games in a period of a month and half, they shouldn't be relied upon either. The team is greater than any individual

 Not this brain dead point again. EVERY team manages fast bowlers like Archer, wood, Akhtar, lee, etc.

 

I swear Indians are simply brain dead about how fast bowlers should be managed. I guess you think we should treat bumrah like how Pakistanis treated Afridi and now he is a trundler. 

 

Soon Siraj will also be grounded to dust.

 

Managing bowlers workload and having backups is how you continue to have a consistent, great bowling attack

 

 

We have turned so many fast bowlers into trundlers by mismanagement of workload and injuries in the past yet people like you never learn your lesson. A gem like bumrah comes once in many generations and you want to use him like a workhorse. 

Edited by New guy
Posted
20 minutes ago, New guy said:

 Not this brain dead point again. EVERY team manages fast bowlers like Archer, wood, Akhtar, lee, etc.

 

I swear Indians are simply brain dead about how fast bowlers should be managed. I guess you think we should treat bumrah like how Pakistanis treated Afridi and now he is a trundler. 

 

Soon Siraj will also be grounded to dust.

 

Managing bowlers workload and having backups is how you continue to have a consistent, great bowling attack

 

 

We have turned so many fast bowlers into trundlers by mismanagement of workload and injuries in the past yet people like you never learn your lesson. A gem like bumrah comes once in many generations and you want to use him like a workhorse. 

Bumrah's plays nowhere near as much as Afridi did before he had issues. He pretty much rests against every tier 2 opponent and hardly plays any bilateral LOIs. That's where he is being managed

 

Why do Starc and Cummins play every test of Ashes and BGT?

 

It's great to build a bowling attack during phases when team is playing lower opponents. Build a bench strength whatever. But your main guy shouldn't miss matches in an important series to manage workload. That's when you actually need them. Wrap them up in cotton wool in useless games.

 

It's like Argentina resting Messi in KOs of World Cup/Copa America to manage his work rate, there are international friendlies for that.

Posted
35 minutes ago, New guy said:

 Not this brain dead point again. EVERY team manages fast bowlers like Archer, wood, Akhtar, lee, etc.

 

I swear Indians are simply brain dead about how fast bowlers should be managed. I guess you think we should treat bumrah like how Pakistanis treated Afridi and now he is a trundler. 

 

Soon Siraj will also be grounded to dust.

 

Managing bowlers workload and having backups is how you continue to have a consistent, great bowling attack

 

 

We have turned so many fast bowlers into trundlers by mismanagement of workload and injuries in the past yet people like you never learn your lesson. A gem like bumrah comes once in many generations and you want to use him like a workhorse. 

Yes Siraj deserved rest too. We need to have a bigger pool and ensure top pacers play only important games and series

 

Having said our pacers need to work on their fitness too. Most get injured too easily 

Posted
32 minutes ago, Vickydev said:

Bumrah's plays nowhere near as much as Afridi did before he had issues. He pretty much rests against every tier 2 opponent and hardly plays any bilateral LOIs. That's where he is being managed

 

Why do Starc and Cummins play every test of Ashes and BGT?

 

It's great to build a bowling attack during phases when team is playing lower opponents. Build a bench strength whatever. But your main guy shouldn't miss matches in an important series to manage workload. That's when you actually need them. Wrap them up in cotton wool in useless games.

 

It's like Argentina resting Messi in KOs of World Cup/Copa America to manage his work rate, there are international friendlies for that.

Na it's fine Bumrah plays this many

His action is peculiar,if he plays just to make numbers it hurts more

Plus his absence gives others opportunity to take the lead,like Siraj thus giving more options

How many times people will give Aussie trio example?they are exceptional athletes infact no one comes close to them

That is a norm ,with too much cricket including franchise cricket everyone is getting injured 

Before them the previous Aussie batch was also mostly injury ridden 

I feel Harshit should be given a long consistent rope against WI at home resting Siraj or maybe Bumrah as well,we don't need the two seniors anyway at home

Harshit coming good does serves us well

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...