Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Interns are of low quality. They use ChatGTP/AI tools and their work is sloippy. We are far away from replacing engineers with AI. 

 

Which tools are you using?

Posted
54 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Which tools are you using?

I had tried GitHub CoPilot, I don't do it on a regular basis But mostly get by google AI/stackoverflow/github  reddit searches

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

Interns are of low quality. They use ChatGTP/AI tools and their work is sloippy. We are far away from replacing engineers with AI. 

Nah depends on the AI models. If you use anthropic models like Claude it is pretty good in agent mode but doesn’t replace people yet. I linked GitHub and Atlassian MCP. I get a good understanding of what the code is doing even if I am not in the weeds. 

Edited by gattaca
Posted
9 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

I had tried GitHub CoPilot, I don't do it on a regular basis But mostly get by google AI/stackoverflow/github  reddit searches

 

Github copilot + Claude Sonnet 4 + repo context in agent mode works better than mid level engineers.

Posted

I get reports which uses language/explanation etc I know could not have come from individual. Apart from that use the word AI once every 2nd statement. I no longer sell vada pav, I sell AI pada pav. 

 

Reality is AI certainly helps. Existing programs/operation I only see it helping with some optimisation but new work, if planned properly, could cause major dent on entry level jobs. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Apart from using it at work, it has become helpful in day to day life. Like if I have purchase something from amazon and product specifications doesn't make sense for me, then I just as chatgpt/gemini about it.

Exactly , my 2am Wikipedia searches are done through Gemini these days. Getting a lot of targeted ads on Grok on X. Hesitating to install it on my device Any Grok users here?

Posted

Tried paid version of Chat GPT. Many responses were wrong.Just can't trust it. Stopped paying for it. Books are better than this even though they are more costly. Useless where quality and factual information is key requirement.

Posted

I’ve noticed that it’s getting a lot better and getting better FAST.

 

I often use it if I wanna quickly brush up some topic. The important thing is that u gotta keep pushing the AI. Don’t just believe what it says. Ask it to explain why. Most times it will be able to correct itself successfully.


The other use case that I’ve observed in public (in general) is that it’s enabling people to do well defined tasks super fast. Let’s say someone needs to automate something or start a website etc. 

But the bottom line is you gotta use your judgment and not believe it blindly. But it’s no doubt one powerful tool which as of now can’t be used autonomously. 

Posted
4 hours ago, crictime said:

Tried paid version of Chat GPT. Many responses were wrong.Just can't trust it. Stopped paying for it. Books are better than this even though they are more costly. Useless where quality and factual information is key requirement.

 

Treat it as a helper, not as master.

×
×
  • Create New...