Jump to content

India A team to play South Africa A: Pant captain


Sooda

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, New guy said:

Once again this asnine comment.

 

Before quota system south africa never went past the semi finals of any cup. After quota system they have reached 3 finals and won one. 

 

Racist bigots cried and cried about Bavumas place yet he proved himself to be one of the best test batsmen and led team as captain to a WTC win which even india hasn't.

 

Their quota system worked and PROVED diversity makes a team stronger, even mentally.

 

But we still have our brown uncle Toms licking boots of goras and fighting fake battles and lying on their behalf and playing mental gymnastics. Amazing.

Read what I wrote.. I said Buvama got more chances to prove than another guy . Please keep that sermonizing to yourself

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ShoonyaSifar said:

Anyone averaging 31 after 40 tests should be called out for lack of performance performance. 

 

Massive credit to him for turning it around though and for winning the WTC. Will still likely end his career with a sub-40 test average and not even 10 test 100s.

 

BTW SA had decided to relax their quota system for big tournaments. T20 WC Final team had Rabada, Maharaj and Shamsi while WTC 2025 Final team had Rabada, Ngidi and Maharaj as three players of color.

Batting in RSA the last 10 years has become extremely difficult. Only AB and Kohli managed a way to consistently score there, at 50+ average. 

 

If you look at their batting stats, no RSA guy has 40+ average. Elgar retired with 37 odd avg, Markram still going at 35-36, Bavuma and de Kock 38+. Not saying they would have averaged 50+ on normal tracks, but they are a bit better than what their stats suggest. In the last cycle, in many low scoring matches, Bavuma would come and score a clutch 30/40/50+, and that would decide the game. Even in WTC final, RSA were getting blown apart in their 1st innings, when Bavuma and Bedingham kept them in the game, and of course in the runchase, he and Markram sealed the deal with a 150 runs partnership in a 280 target. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted
1 minute ago, Manucrick said:

Hope we use his purple patch already wasted Sarfraz purple patch

Jurel is younger and much more fitter.  Sarfaraz is 3-4, years older and not that fit.

Posted
21 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Jurel should bat at 3 in tests.

 

Been saying this for more than a year now. 

We can still have sai at 3 jurel at 6. We dont need nkr. Kuldeep bumrah siraj washi jadeja is enough bowling

Posted
57 minutes ago, Manucrick said:

Hope we use his purple patch already wasted Sarfraz purple patch

Inspite of non perfomance Sai will play ahead of Jurel.

 

Posted

Honestly Pant Jurel at 5 and 6 can be game changer for india in sub continental conditions. With old ball and their attacking style of play ans ability to play spin it ll be monstrous with Jadeja and Washington to follow

Posted
49 minutes ago, Manucrick said:

Just try him at 3 he will do better than sai

I think 3 is not good. We may get less output. He looks uber comfortable against older ball. WHy change it.

Posted
1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

I think 3 is not good. We may get less output. He looks uber comfortable against older ball. WHy change it.

my point exactly,dont expose him to the new ball that early but the problem is we need somebody to play no 3 and i dont know if Gill will take it on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...