Jump to content

We need to talk about Rajat Patidar.


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, tweaker said:

Rajat Patidar may walk in the test team as Gambhir don't want Sarfaraz in the team.

Inspite of scoring huge runs for 2,3 seasons,Rajat Patidar was selected ahead of Sarfaraz.

He failed in three test ,then Sarfaraz was selected 

Posted

 

Rajat is a Good batsman and great to watch, though yes home track bully in IPL 

 

It is testament to India's depth in T20i that he may not get into a second 11. If or when SKY sits out Iyer needs to replace him as no 4 and captain 

Posted
On 4/7/2026 at 6:10 AM, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Passenger in ICC tourneys. He's a bilateral king and a minnow basher. As soon as the ICC tourney kicks off and he comes up against better teams or bowling attacks he struggles. He has played 2021 WT20, 2022 WT20, 2023 ODI WC, 2024 WT20 and 2026 WT20 so far. That's 5 ICC tourneys and his best performance has been against USA in 2026 in a group stage.

 

In fact his biggest contribution has been Miller's catch. Other than that he has mostly played supporting role and never managed to win a match on his own the way Tilak, Ishan, Abhishek, Dube, Samson, Pandya, Axar have. Literally every batter in the team has outperformed him in ICC tourneys. Even Axar is more clutch and better performances with the bat than SKY.

 

SKY's stats are just like Chahal - great in bilaterals and meaningless games but when a big match rolls around you know what's gonna happen. Neither of them are gonna be much of a factor. The sooner India moves on from him and brings in Iyer, the better.

Yes Sky has struggled in ICC tourneys but he wasn't that bad in 2024 WC. He played some crucial innings in that tournament. Let's leave his 50 against USA, he did score a 53 of 27 against Afghanistan, 31 (16) against Australia, an important 47 (36) against England in the semi-final which was crucial after India had lost 2 wickets early on a very difficult pitch. But I agree that his performances overall in T20I WCs has been disappointing but again he did save us from an embarrassment against USA in the 2026 WC.

 

Rajat Patidar isn't the replacement India should be looking for a well as he is almost 33 and he will be replacing a 35 year old. This is the time to build a team for the next T20 WC and Patidar isn't going to make it to that. India need to invest on young players who are performing well in SMAT and IPL. The problem is that the players available and doing well are all top order batters. Jaiswal, Vaibhav, Ayush Mhathre etc. Also we are looking at a captaincy candidate and Iyer falls in that space quite well. I can't see Patidar being drafted into the T20I side as captain. As far as middle order bats are concerned none of them other than Shreyas Iyer pop up in terms of consistency in the format over the last few years.

Posted
1 hour ago, StraightDrive26 said:

Yes Sky has struggled in ICC tourneys but he wasn't that bad in 2024 WC. He played some crucial innings in that tournament. Let's leave his 50 against USA, he did score a 53 of 27 against Afghanistan, 31 (16) against Australia, an important 47 (36) against England in the semi-final which was crucial after India had lost 2 wickets early on a very difficult pitch. But I agree that his performances overall in T20I WCs has been disappointing but again he did save us from an embarrassment against USA in the 2026 WC.

 

Rajat Patidar isn't the replacement India should be looking for a well as he is almost 33 and he will be replacing a 35 year old. This is the time to build a team for the next T20 WC and Patidar isn't going to make it to that. India need to invest on young players who are performing well in SMAT and IPL. The problem is that the players available and doing well are all top order batters. Jaiswal, Vaibhav, Ayush Mhathre etc. Also we are looking at a captaincy candidate and Iyer falls in that space quite well. I can't see Patidar being drafted into the T20I side as captain. As far as middle order bats are concerned none of them other than Shreyas Iyer pop up in terms of consistency in the format over the last few years.

 

Iyer is the replacement. Patidar is the 2nd choice for now but for the longer run he isn't an option due to his age. SKY has under-performed massively. His best knocks have been in the support role. The Aussie match in 2024 WT20 was all Rohit. His Eng knock was better but again Rohit had provided a great start. Till now SKY hasn't shown up even once as the main man. You can't carry on in the supporting role batting at 3 or 4. Literally every other batter has won the match on their own or made the difference except for SKY. Abhishek, Samson, Tilak, Rohit, Ishan, Dube, Pandya, Axar have all stood up and won the matches on their own. SKY is the only one whose best performance is just a support role and that too came more than 2 years ago. He has simply coasted along and carried by a stellar team. He's no different from Gill though a better captain.

Posted (edited)
On 4/8/2026 at 8:25 AM, singhvivek141 said:

Patidar is 32-33, he may have hit a purple patch but age isn't in his favour.

Better to invest on someone who is younger and play the same role

Think t20 as wc to wc, good 2-3 yrs of a top player is should be good enough , game is moving too fast. sr of 145 is looking ordinary now.

Edited by tapandrun
Posted
On 4/10/2026 at 9:39 PM, The Realist said:

Project Patidar already flopped. Looked out of his depth in last home Eng series.

 

None of these Projects (eg. Sky & Raina in tests) ever work out.

 

 

 

Taking about T20is here though 

Posted
On 4/13/2026 at 11:25 AM, vvvslaxman said:

This is SMAT stats 2025/26

 

Strike rate/Balls per six .   

 

unnamed-3.png

 

 

urvi cant find his place in playing xi

Posted
26 minutes ago, velu said:

 

 

urvi cant find his place in playing xi

CSK backed the wrong horses upfront. He should be opening with Samson or Ayush. Unleash the youngsters. Then use the experienced in the middle. Use Brevis, Dube to polish off. There is no real clarity in their approach.  They used both youngsters in same match and burnt their hands. Should have played just one and see how he goes.

Posted
18 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

CSK backed the wrong horses upfront. He should be opening with Samson or Ayush. Unleash the youngsters. Then use the experienced in the middle. Use Brevis, Dube to polish off. There is no real clarity in their approach.  They used both youngsters in same match and burnt their hands. Should have played just one and see how he goes.

Ruturaj must be dropped

Posted
21 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Ruturaj must be dropped

He looks pre-historic when you watch how some of the other guys go. Self-preservation comes first

Posted
3 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

He looks pre-historic when you watch how some of the other guys go. Self-preservation comes first

Opener these days in IPL have to be natural 6-hitter, som1 who can hit 6s on pace and on spin bowling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...