Stuge Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 Islamic Republic of Pakistan :dontknow: yes .thats true ;) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ on Topic : who cares its them who decided to stay there . on a serious note: Humans are judged on the basis of religion and that's the hard core truth .I know its sad :(
jonas10 Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 Islamic Republic of Pakistan :dontknow: So that means other religions not welcome i presume...thanks for confirming what we all know about your country. PS Please dont be a hypocrite that means - dont start complaining about France not letting your women run around in burkhas then. And not allowing Minarets in Switzerland/ no ground zero masjid etc.
Texy Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 Forget Hindus....the word "hindu" will be non existent in next decade or so in Pakistan. Ahmadiyas are not even considered human in Pakistan. Pamphlets branding members of the minority Ahmadiya community as "wajib-ul-qatl" (fit to be killed) and inciting people to attack them are being openly circulated in Pakistan. The level of intolerance in Pakistan is incomparable to even other muslim majority countries. Zakir Naik never mentions any of this in any of his preaching sessions thus further proving his double standards much like many other muslim preachers around the world to whom most pakistanis & other muslims look up to for guidance
Equinox Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 Most Hindus in Pakistan post-partition were in East Pakistan (modern-day Bangladesh). The Independence of Bangladesh in 1971 led to the dramatic fall in population of Hindus in Pakistan.
ganeshran Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 Regardless of the level of the fall of percentage of minorities, it is true that Pakistani is moving more and more towards intolerance sponsored and condoned by the state. Ridiculous laws like the blasphemy law should be repealed because they have time again been used to settle personal disputes in the garb of religion. If the state seeks specifically to prevent people from questioning their faith, the progress of the nation can only go backwards.
EnterTheVoid Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 Oh so India is now the moral guardians of Hindus everywhere? :facepalm: How about we fix up what's going in our own backyard before lecturing anyone else
coffee_rules Posted June 14, 2011 Posted June 14, 2011 Most Hindus in Pakistan post-partition were in East Pakistan (modern-day Bangladesh). The Independence of Bangladesh in 1971 led to the dramatic fall in population of Hindus in Pakistan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Bangladesh Hinduism is the second largest religious affiliation in Bangladesh, covering more than 9.2% of the population, according to the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.[1] In terms of population, Bangladesh is the third largest Hindu state in the world after India and Nepal. 9.2% down from 25% as per Outsider's blog.
The Outsider Posted June 14, 2011 Posted June 14, 2011 CR : The eastern border saw a lot of migration even after 1949 - I never got around to factoring in those figures. Also there was the mass evacuation and genocide around 1971.
Misu243 Posted June 15, 2011 Posted June 15, 2011 Not surprising at all. There's a very significant difference in the structure of both countries and how they are governed. One country is governed using Religion and the other one is more Democratic and secular. I'm not going to give my opinion on whether I think which one is good because the results are right before our eyes. One nation is struggling to maintain its integrity while its innocent people are giving up their lives while the other one has one of the biggest economies in the world, an emerging market economy and plays a prominent role in the overall global economy. Also..I think Pakistanis should stop giving their opinion on what Indian muslims should and should not do. Religion does not determine how people are governed in India. Just sayin..Same goes for radical hindu groups in India...there should be no place for them in Indian society either.
mishra Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 Oh so India is now the moral guardians of Hindus everywhere? :facepalm: How about we fix up what's going in our own backyard before lecturing anyone else +1 Forget Hindus, when idi Amin was kicking some desi arses, it was England who came to save them. No wonder they call motherland, Engerland
yoshi Posted July 17, 2011 Posted July 17, 2011 would you guys agree that if the partition were to happen today and not in the 40's it could be called ethnic cleansing?
Rajiv Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Islamic Republic of Pakistan :dontknow: Whoz got the bigger heart, India keeping Muslims or Pakistanis like you who openly refuse other religions?
Rajiv Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 would you guys agree that if the partition were to happen today and not in the 40's it could be called ethnic cleansing? 75-80 yrs ago man, someone like jinnah would be crucified on social sites and be the target of comedy central
suraj Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Islamic Republic of Pakistan :dontknow: That is ****ing excuse by that token every other country in the world can name themselves as " Islam followers die republic" & send every Muslim to the "fatal showers"- right??
Trichromatic Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 That is ****ing excuse by that token every other country in the world can name themselves as " Islam followers die republic" & send every Muslim to the "fatal showers"- right?? Well it's their choice. One country chooses to be secular and other chooses not to be so. Being Islamic republic means that people of other religions are not allowed to spread their religion. You can't say that because we follow these set of rules, so you should also follow the same set of rules.
suraj Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Well it's their choice. One country chooses to be secular and other chooses not to be so. Being Islamic republic means that people of other religions are not allowed to spread their religion. You can't say that because we follow these set of rules, so you should also follow the same set of rules. When you say "their"- what exactly do you mean?? Who is this "their" & who gave them this right to decide?? Can rednecks in USA & neo-nazis of countries in Europe decide today that everyone who is non-white or non-Christian should leave these lands and you will be ok with that?? Pakistan is a *****y piece of religious land but fortunately it is a small *****y piece of religious land otherwise these kind of psuedo- intellectual theories will mean death for milliions or billions and then I am sure it will not be so easy for us to say "You can't say that because we follow these set of rules, so you should also follow the same set of rules"
mishra Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Isn't percentage of Hindus declining in India too. Decline curve is a bit steep in Pakistan, thats all ? :nervous:
someone Posted July 18, 2011 Posted July 18, 2011 Isn't percentage of Hindus declining in India too. Decline curve is a bit steep in Pakistan' date=' thats all ? :nervous:[/quote'] And wait till the "minority" become "majority" and then see the demand for "total" control and "specific religious" law
Recommended Posts