Malcolm Merlyn Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 I doubt that. Anything to back that up?I feel we see less howlers from umpires these days.Check the number of howlers vs India in Australia in last tour.And one ODI and another howler.ECB and CA are hell bent on DRS.Remember its English and Aussie companies which make the stuff used in DRS.There is huge pressure from them on these boards to make ICC fund DRS.BCCI is blocking it. sscomp32 and BlueBee 2 Link to comment
Number Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Yeh kitna besharam aadmi hai.You are national team's captain and you see kaanspiracy in 50-50 decisions not going your way. And his usual bullshitting about drs is what we are listening from a decade now. Bore.. zzz Link to comment
express bowling Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Why is there only one Indian umpire in the ICC elite panel ? We have seen so many English and Australian umpires over the years and only 2 from India after the elite panel of neutral umpires have been formed. Link to comment
kosingh Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 BCCI's #1 issue with DRS is, as usual, $$$. India has so many stadiums, it would cost a LOT to get the technology installed at all of them. And on top of that, the DRS system comes with strings attached - it is vendor specific so BCCI doesn't have much leeway in negotiating. IIRC, in early discussions of DRS, BCCI was pushing for a different implementation, and was not so stridently against it.Irony is, as it turns out, DRS does have some serious flaws in it, so BCCI's dollar-driven stand actually has some sort of leg to stand on now. Then why doesn't BCCI agree to DRS on foreign tours? Link to comment
Stuge Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 What is he trying to say ? Blame something or other for poor tactics overall -_- Link to comment
Stuge Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 What is he trying to say ? Blame something or other for poor tactics overall -_- Link to comment
putrevus Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Taking out lovely turners from IND to AUS Drop in pitchGive me the power i ll show you how its doneADI has a really good point thereSo other countries are wearing bangles? why would they allow it.If BCCI and its fans think they can win only on spinning pitches, why play these tournaments just keep playing IPL.Even USA with all their might and clout in basketball relearned to play with Olympic rules to win gold medals.Power is about getting your opinion heard and BCCI has plenty of it,DRS is prime example. Link to comment
sandeep Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Then why doesn't BCCI agree to DRS on foreign tours?Because they would then have no reason not to use it on home tours. In any event, the funding question is secondary at this point. The 'umpire's call' farce needs to be addressed to improve DRS... adi B and sscomp32 2 Link to comment
New guy Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 They pretty much give 50 - 50's to home sideSame shit happened in Beggardesh and same thing again in AUSand then we got vineet kulkarni who gives wrong once against his own team and makes it lose DRS is not for 50-50 Link to comment
New guy Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Because they would then have no reason not to use it on home tours. In any event, the funding question is secondary at this point. The 'umpire's call' farce needs to be addressed to improve DRS...This is the lamest excuse ever. DRS can easily adress howlers but lets point to umpires call. So you are ok taking 100% umpire calls (which is match without DRS) but not ok taking 10% of the referred decisions as umpires call sandeep 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 This is the lamest excuse ever. DRS can easily adress howlers but lets point to umpires call. So you are ok taking 100% umpire calls (which is match without DRS) but not ok taking 10% of the referred decisions as umpires callCalm down, dont get your panties all twisted up. OK, let me clarify so you understand. I'm not talking about my personal preference regarding DRS. I was referring to the BCCI's position on the matter. Personally, I would want BCCI to accept DRS in its current form, because, flawed as it is, it would help our team's chances of winning. I would also want BCCI to push for changes on the implementation side. But as much as you and I can debate what we want, BCCI's official position is pretty much set in stone at the moment, and is not going to shift unless changes in the DRS give it a fig-leaf to re-visit its stance. Rasgulla, adi B and sscomp32 3 Link to comment
Singh bling Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Now Rohit Sharma is given not out , what Dhoni has to say? Link to comment
Furious007 Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Well there you go India get a lot of 50 50 decisions go their way as well. Rohit was clearly out and given not out all you people screaming poor India need to get a life. Sent from India Link to comment
beautifulgame Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 People who complain about umpire call are those who just don't understand DRS.Umpire's call works fine.Without Umpire's call we will face fiascos like the 08-09 Srl tour .If BCCI doesn't want Hawkeye prediction there is nothing wrong with that.They could simply implement other features of DRS like Snicko RTS and simple replays to eliminate howlers.But the morons at BCCI just completely refuse entire DRS becoz they don't understand some aspect of it .Buch of idiots. The amount of matches it has cost us in last few years is beyond ridiculous. Link to comment
Trichromatic Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Rahane would have been out if we had DRS here. Singh bling and New guy 1 1 Link to comment
New guy Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Rahane would have been out if we had DRS here.Pretty sure they wouldn't have referred. Link to comment
Trichromatic Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Pretty sure they wouldn't have referred. With 15-20 overs left, they would have. Link to comment
New guy Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 With 15-20 overs left, they would have.He was too far ahead and there was lots of doubt Well we can also say, Dhoni would have been in much earlier and we would have scored more so still India's loss Link to comment
beautifulgame Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Also I really can't believe that hit the stumps .He was so far out of his crease and it hit his knee rollThat's one of the reasons I don't trust the Hawk eye predictions .IMO they should increase the margin of umpire call in Hawkeye and only plumb or howler LBW decisions should be overturned Link to comment
beautifulgame Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 How many matches overseas we have to be screwed before the idiots at BCCI realize the importance of DRS .We would have won both the 1st and 3rd ODI if we had DRS.Even the test series in SA and Australia could have changed completely if we had DRS .Yet the idiot BCCI president comes up the the same old pathetic excuse DRS is not 100% .What a surprise when the BCCI president can't even operate computer, he struggles to understand the importance of DRS Seriously these guys are killing Indian cricket .And then Dhoni comes up with ridiculous conspiracy theories .Why not accept DRS instead if u feel umpires are against u ? How on earth is having DRS worse that losing every series away from home ?God know how frustrating this is to be an Indian fan with these idiots in charge Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now