Lord Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 In pak we have bowlers like awana on every street playing cricket. time to play them,dont u think?Tanvir se toh better hi hain
namasteji1 Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 Thread starter- Added to list of "most intelligent" people here. (Sarcasm)
Lord Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 yes,showed potential,was just nervous,not the best conditions for debut
maniac Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 The last thing we need is a one more pathetic fielder...when you get outbowled by Dinda,you must be real bad.
Magneto Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 Awana will get barracked in each and every ground if he fields like this ... it's difficult to hide him in the field.
Utalk Posted December 22, 2012 Posted December 22, 2012 Yadav is your best pacer by a mile. Look after the kid, world cricket needs him.
rkt.india Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 Yadav is your best pacer by a mile. Look after the kid' date=' world cricket needs him.[/quote'] People were talking similarly about Yadav once he was thrashed on T20s and ODIs. People do not understand it is very hard for bowler to start well in these flat conditions in India. His last couple of bowls yesterday were clocked 141 and 140K, but on the last ball he just missed his length in an effort to bowl yorker and that disapperared for six straight over his head. Same thing happened to Dinda on that last 6 by Morgan.
Lord Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 People were talking similarly about Yadav once he was thrashed on T20s and ODIs. People do not understand it is very hard for bowler to start well in these flat conditions in India. His last couple of bowls yesterday were clocked 141 and 140K' date=' but on the last ball he just missed his length in an effort to bowl yorker and that disapperared for six straight over his head. Same thing happened to Dinda on that last 6 by Morgan.[/quote'] but clocking speeds isnt the answer clearly.we need bowler who can bowl in good areas under pressure n have varities,even if they r slower.on flat decks,pace works to batsmen advantage
rkt.india Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 but clocking speeds isnt the answer clearly.we need bowler who can bowl in good areas under pressure n have varities' date='even if they r slower.on flat decks,pace works to batsmen advantage[/quote'] In SC, most fast bowlers are thrashed. The areas they bowled were not bad areas, but in T20 there is no real good area except blockhole. T20 should not be a criteria to judge bowlers.
Lord Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 In SC' date=' most fast bowlers are thrashed. The areas they bowled were not bad areas, but in T20 there is no real good area except blockhole. T20 should not be a criteria to judge bowlers.[/quote'] please,they kept bowling short n getting thrashed then bowling short again.those were bad reas for T20.I dont mind batsmen driving n getting 4 but they shouldnt be cutting n pulling so regularly.also there was no change of pace that said,they played in wrong format n showed potential.Dinda in particular showed lots of spirit
rkt.india Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 please,they kept bowling short n getting thrashed then bowling short again.those were bad reas for T20.I dont mind batsmen driving n getting 4 but they shouldnt be cutting n pulling so regularly.also there was no change of pace that said,they played in wrong format n showed potential.Dinda in particular showed lots of spirit got mostly edges on short balls which could have been catch to fielders on some other day like Rahane's. I guess this learning curve and thats how one learns.
Ultimate_Game Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 Fast bowlers in Indian cricket are like backup QBs in American football - the ones on the bench always seem better than the starters :haha:
Baasir Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 Daikhty hain tests main bhe kia danda chlata hai Dinda aor parwana.
Lord Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 got mostly edges on short balls which could have been catch to fielders on some other day like Rahane's. I guess this learning curve and thats how one learns. yes but they overdid it.Rahane wicket was a lucky.u cant bowl for that.
express bowling Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 Awana is a fast-medium bowler who hits the deck hard and can push he batsmen on the back foot. He is a trier. We should not judge him by 2 t20s where he was obviously bowling less than his best. He may not be the best pick but comes into the picture as we need a large pacer pool due to so many injuries to better prospects like Umesh and Aaron.
msb1991 Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 Awana is a fast-medium bowler who hits the deck hard and can push he batsmen on the back foot. He is a trier. We should not judge him by 2 t20s where he was obviously bowling less than his best. He may not be the best pick but comes into the picture as we need a large pacer pool due to so many injuries to better prospects like Umesh and Aaron. Indeed. Despite impressing people in IPL, T20 does not appear to be his format. He seems an expensive bowler who can pick up wickets. He has a high economy in FC cricket and List A cricket too. I'm curious to see if he can do well in ODIs or Tests and am quietly optimistic about his chances.
vvvslaxman Posted December 23, 2012 Posted December 23, 2012 Fast bowlers in Indian cricket are like backup QBs in American football - the ones on the bench always seem better than the starters :haha: :giggle: so true.. We always miss players who is not getting the game
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now