zumi Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 So if Pollard didn't get out they were ahead on par. Pollard gets out going for a wild heave, and suddenly it rains and West Indies are also behind par score due to fall of wicket :hysterical: feel sorry for West Indies
Sachin=GOD Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 the rain screws the opposition team in a match featuring SA - thats not a good sign. Will SA go on to win this thing :nervous:
bulbul Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 Blame it on dumb Pollard. Finally Pollack & Boucher can forget their 2003 nightmare .
coffee_rules Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 SA getting their Due from WC losses of 1992 and 2003.
Lord Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 dumb from Pollard but sad to see such an important game end like that.need reserve days at least
zumi Posted June 14, 2013 Author Posted June 14, 2013 well Pollard's brainfart in terms of match context seals west indies fate saffers and india through to semis
G_B_ Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 It was dumb from Pollard RR was under control, that was a dumb shot.
BeautifulGame Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 Also this mean we are assured of top spot in our Group.Good news for us this tie.
saneindian Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 So his side needed 41 off 24 balls (including 6 deliveries by Steyn), Pollard tried to hit first ball of the over for a 4 or 6 and he is dumb! Was he expected to do tuk tuk at that stage with his side needing 10+ an over?
flamy Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 Also this mean we are assured of top spot in our Group.Good news for us this tie. It also means we play at this same venue - Cardiff. feckity feck :nice:
vvvslaxman Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 Thats okay.. SA needs to be on the right side of D/L for a change.. after all these years.
Lord Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 So his side needed 41 off 24 balls (including 6 deliveries by Steyn)' date=' Pollard tried to hit first ball of the over for a 4 or 6 and he is dumb! Was he expected to do tuk tuk at that stage with his side needing 10+ an over?[/quote'] they needed 8 an over but still I agree with you
bulbul Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 So his side needed 41 off 24 balls (including 6 deliveries by Steyn)' date=' Pollard tried to hit first ball of the over for a 4 or 6 and he is dumb! Was he expected to do tuk tuk at that stage with his side needing 10+ an over?[/quote'] He has to keep in mind rai and par score. This is not a normal chase where you can try to slog and even if get-out count on Sammy.
RedFever Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 8.10pm 1992: South Africa lost to rain. 1996: They lost to West Indies. 1999: They lost to a tie. 2003: They lost to a tie on D/L. Today, on June 14, 2013, South Africa have beaten all four of them. Joe Lekker Ding. Still waiting for the presentation Comparing World Cup to Champions trophy
NareshK Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 Yeah, one ball made the difference. Pollard's shot was terrible but I guess this is just in hindsight. He was just trying to win the game. Its funny because its usually SA who are on the receiving end of something like this. :P
vvvslaxman Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 Batting second is big advantage in rain curtailed games. But this is one those incident that is so freakish. One moment clear sky. Next moment rain pouring. Both teams were ahead of each other at various points in this run chase. It was like inky pinky ponky game.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now