Jadeja is a mature cricketer now, says Cheteshwar Pujara

[FischerTal]

Che bhai :hatsoff: Sir Jadeja

[SLICKR392]

'Sir' has proved his mettle," Pujara laughed.

:cantstop:

[cowboysfan]

Didnt ICF come up with 'sir' for Jadeja?

[JaFanatic]

Didnt ICF come up with 'sir' for Jadeja?

we started this culture :proud:

[Lord]

Didnt ICF come up with 'sir' for Jadeja?

not sure

[vvvslaxman]

Raina should be there for death batting at the end. Pujara needs to be in the top order or not in the side at all. He can't bat at 6.

True that.. He should come in top 4.. We were worried about Dhawan and Rohit. Now that they have done well, Pujara will struggle to find a place in the limited over set up . Also KKD did play well in England, SA at test level. We cannot say he is only good in subcontinent. He deserves a place in the squad though. If one of them goes out of form he can replace whoever goes out of form.

[FischerTal]

True that.. He should come in top 4.. We were worried about Dhawan and Rohit. Now that they have done well' date=' Pujara will struggle to find a place in the limited over set up . Also KKD did play well in England, SA at test level. We cannot say he is only good in subcontinent. He deserves a place in the squad though. If one of them goes out of form he can replace whoever goes out of form.[/quote'] i agree. che should be in tests right now

[flamy]

[SLICKR392]

Didnt ICF come up with 'sir' for Jadeja?

I think so too. ICF - Twitter - Rest of the world. :proud:

[trundlerNO1]

Both are great talents Future ATGs for sure

[jalebi_bhai]

the thing is with Sir' date= I dont think even he knows which way some of his balls will turn. Impossible to read him off his wrist and arm action. If he played poker with that bowling action he would win big.

I'm not necessarily sure that is a good thing though......you could say he is unpredictable.....but on the other hand.....you could also say he lacks control......

[vvvslaxman]

I'm not necessarily sure that is a good thing though......you could say he is unpredictable.....but on the other hand.....you could also say he lacks control......

He rarely loses control with his line and length. That is what important. It doesn't matter if doesn't have control over his turn.

[FischerTal]

when che bhai says it, you better believe it :bigboss:

[SLICKR392]

I'm not necessarily sure that is a good thing though......you could say he is unpredictable.....but on the other hand.....you could also say he lacks control......

Best apart about him is his accuracy. Bowls at a fantastic line and you need a really good control to have that good accuracy.

[rkt.india]

the thing is with Sir' date=' I[b'] dont think even he knows which way some of his balls will turn. Impossible to read him off his wrist and arm action. If he played poker with that bowling action he would win big.

This is not right to say to Sir. Sir knows even you left, right, and center and you are talking about he does not what he is bowling. If you watch him closely you will find that he delivers the ball at different trajectories. It was shown in match analysis by commentators some time, dont that remember which match and due to those different trajectories he gets different purchase from the wicket. His quicker deliveries are of more round armish and lower trajectory like a slingy bowler which go straight on and dont turn while the balls which turn are more straight arm though you wont see much difference in speed and seam of the ball and still you will get two different results after pitching and he does bowl them intentionally. Look at Shoaib Malik's dismissal. Sir foxed him completely.