Jump to content

India tour of New Zealand 2014


fineleg

India tour of New Zealand 2014  

  1. 1.

    • Yes. Dhoni had enough to him. Time to DUMP now.
      13
    • No Way.
      33


Recommended Posts

Posted
I just blame him for that statement, opener should never utter those words, I dont blame batsmen for mess so far on this tour nor SA series loss odis and tests. I blame Dhoni and bowling for all the mess.This moron has be kicked out from captaincy other wise Indian team will never win anything overseas period.
Should be stripped of captaincy from Test as well as T20 format will let him continue till 2015 after that give the captaincy to Virat.
Posted
fzzipcyFf5M
:haha::hysterical:You call that turn...:giggle: It just went on with the arm ... :stupid: Probably hit Kula's thigh pad on the way too... Can't remember a single time asswin or any other Indian darters actually spun a ball in recent times ....
Posted

Dhawan Tested: After dream debut, career takes nightmarish turn http://www.hindustantimes.com/specials/cricket/india-vs-newzealand-2014/innz2014-dontmiss/dhawan-tested-after-dream-debut-career-takes-nightmarish-turn/sp-article10-1181542.aspx With his failure in the first Test against New Zealand, Shikhar Dhawan’s scorecard in his last seven Test outings makes a pathetic reading: 132 runs at an average of a mere 18.87. Wind back to March 2013. Dhawan burst into the Test arena with a brilliant 187 in 174 balls on debut.against Australia at Mohali. Fans and experts both were quick to proclaim that India had found another Sehwag. Since then, it has been a downhill journey with scores reading 23, 33, 13, 15, 29, 19 and 0. To be fair to him, Dhawan's overall figures are not all that bleak. He has scored 319 runs at an average of 39.87 from eight Test innings so far. But take away the 187, and his average falls to a lowly 18.87. Comparatively speaking, his performance abroad has been worse. In the five innings he has played on foreign soil, he has scored a total of 76 runs, at an average of 15.2. The way he has given his wicket away has been worrying his fans and cricket experts alike. In his second Test against West Indies in Kolkata, he was bowled trying to play a spinner without moving his feet. The next match saw him getting out attempting a slog sweep, a shot that does not feature among the best ones for a Test match. What follows is a string of soft dismissals - mistimed pulls, prods to short balls outside the off stump and manic attempts to hit his way out of trouble. His dismissal on Friday followed the pattern. Chasing a massive score of 503, the opener fell on the second ball of the innings without troubling the scorers. Trent Boult bowled short of length into the pads. All he needed to do at that stage was defend it with soft hands. Instead he made a clumsy, hard handed attempt to turn it towards midwicket. All he managed was a simple catch to Kane Williamson at gully. Experts still hold that Dhawan has a lot of natural talent, it is his temperament that is questionable. Sunil Gavaskar writes this in a column in Daily Mail: "Shikhar Dhawan, Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli, Ajinkya Rahane and Ambati Rayudu can achieve a lot more if only they can combine talent and temperament." Former captain Mohammad Azharuddin echoes the sentiment, "I had observed Shikhar's problem with short ball when he played for India in the Champions Trophy in England. He doesn't leave the rising deliveries and has a tendency to awkwardly fend at it which is wrong." With his repeated failures, many are wondering if Dhawan is a one-match wonder and if it is time to look back at other options, Gautam Gambhir for example, to open the innings for India.

Posted

At least he's owning up to his mistakes saying they could've played the new ball much better than this, unlike the others giving brain dead comments saying nothing is wrong and they're doing well.

Posted
We have done decently well (despite 0-1) in Test series in SA. At least from batting perspective we did not "cave in" to SA's super attack of Steyn, Morkel and Philander. Can we at least do equal or bit better in NZ against Southee, Wagner and Boult, Anderson? I mean - surely Steyn+Morkel+Phil >> this NZ attack. Our batsmen should do better against NZ, but at the moment, does not appear so. We did good in SA series (Tests), and it felt good that our batsmen (Vijay, Chepu, Kholi, 'batsman'-Ashwin, Rahane) did well, we felt proud that our batsmen withstood the super SA attack, so hoping it does not disappear so soon.
Cricket has it own mind. Doing well against SA is no immunity against NZ. Each test is different, you win or lose based on how you perform in that test. If we were to be playing lengthy series (like five tests each against SA and NZ) you can predict the outcome of the NZ tour based on SA tour some what, but you can't predict much based on two tests in SA. On the SA tour also, Indian batting seemed to depend heavily on Kohli and Pujara and India got rolled over once these two failed. Rahane scored a lot of runs in SA, but he did look suspect against bounce and wasn't as comfortable as Kohli or Pujara.
Posted

Not really. NZ bowlers at home can be deadly . I sorta expected this. Ball will be zipping around. Over the years especially India always bungled up the first test except the last series. Simon Doull once ran through us. Also they were a bit complacent here.

Posted

Actually he batted quite decently against the new ball and he is right that the new ball is doing quite a bit here. He got a start but failed to convert which has always been a problem with him and Indian openers in overseas conditions. I remember Akash Chopra doing the same thing. He would bat 60 balls for 20 runs and then get out. Only Sehwag used to score big as an opener but his style was quite different and he used to attack right from the go. Gambhir was decent for a while.

Posted

They have done well at home against South Africa and England always expected it to be a difficult tour for us as the ball swings in the air as well plus our bowling will always make things tough for any tour

Posted

Not really, South Africa, albeit much stronger test nation with better bowling attack, doesn't really mean would be more competitive than NZ when we play them at their home. NZ bowlers at home are really good as they have showed recently. Still India has gotten back the moment after Rohit-Rahane p'ship, but NZ at home again will come out to be too good. Also, recent heroics of some of their bats have made NZ a really good side at home. The delivery which got Kohli got out to was as good as a delivery you can get.

Posted
Actually he batted quite decently against the new ball and he is right that the new ball is doing quite a bit here. He got a start but failed to convert which has always been a problem with him and Indian openers in overseas conditions. I remember Akash Chopra doing the same thing. He would bat 60 balls for 20 runs and then get out. Only Sehwag used to score big as an opener but his style was quite different and he used to attack right from the go. Gambhir was decent for a while.
Gambhir got carried away after 2011 great knock in the final after that highest paid player in IPL he thought if he could lead KKR he can be the captain of Indian team as well while his form was going down rather than working on his weakness he was giving statement after statement of how he wants to lead and him and Viru are great batting pair. Was poor against England/Pakistan in the home series was dropped rightly.
Posted
Dhoni should be given be Bharat Ratna. Single handedly ridding Indians of their cricket addiction. Finally we will realise our potential as a nation.
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted

This NZ bowling and batting is nowhere near SA class. The indian bowlers and captain have become so impotent that they are making everyone look better than they actually are in reality.

Posted
Dhoni should be given be Bharat Ratna. Single handedly ridding Indians of their cricket addiction. Finally we will realise our potential as a nation.
:hysterical::hatsoff:
Posted
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/569243.html They are not. They have issues closing out. But they can be deadly. They play as a unit more than other teams.
it does not matter how well they play as unit, they are a bad team that is made to look better in odis and now in tests by indian captain by his moronic tactics and team selections. winning odd odi matches here and there or doing well in one off test match is what you expect from NZ and punch above their weight in world events. what Dhoni has done is he transformed Indian team into team of real puss*ies of 1990s who the moment they stepped out of Indian shores looked lost and scared Indians so far have been dominated in every game they have played and it is so hard to do it even if you try willingly because by default you should win a match here and there against an inferior team.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...