Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

Indian bowling in T20s look highly mediocre even if you add Bumrah in place of any of other 3 seamers currently in the lineup. For all their batting abilities, only one of Chahar or Harshal can be accommodated in the XI. Need more pace considering the event is in Aus. Currently this is a canon fodder attack for Aussie conditions. 

Plan to play wristys is worth it but the problem once again rears it ugly head when none of the two can bat. 

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Indian bowling in T20s look highly mediocre even if you add Bumrah in place of any of other 3 seamers currently in the lineup. For all their batting abilities, only one of Chahar or Harshal can be accommodated in the XI. Need more pace considering the event is in Aus. Currently this is a canon fodder attack for Aussie conditions. 

Plan to play wristys is worth it but the problem once again rears it ugly head when none of the two can bat. 

bishy can bat a bit, at least in list A

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Bishnoi surely has potential to bat but no hitting ability, this lack of explosives in batting depth is a big handicap. 

The other handicap is Virat at 3 or combined top 3 of Rahul/Rohit/Virat. India look a really ordinary T20 side. Learnt nothing just rinse & repeat

 

Same process isn't going to give different results.

Link to comment
On 2/17/2022 at 5:35 AM, SRT100 said:

 

Whats your thoughts on Bishnoi, first time I have seen him bowl properly and paid attention to him.

 

Seems ok, young spinner with plenty of room to grow and improve. He obviously had a lot of nerves and adrenaline going through him so the wides were expected.

 

The "foul" catch was unfortunate but glad it happens now, so he learns from it in an irrelevant series.

 

How does he bat? What batsman in India is closest like? Like is he an Ashwin in ODI cricket or is he like a good allrounder?

 

 

He will go up a clear level with a working, decent leg break to go with the stock googly, should work with Kumble or someone on this. In addition his body language and energy on the field are good things to have. 

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

He will go up a clear level with a working, decent leg break to go with the stock googly, should work with Kumble or someone on this. In addition his body language and energy on the field are good things to have. 

Kumble didn't have a great leg break. With his action, Bishnoi won't have a great leg break too. It's just not possible. And to change things at this point is useless. He is already doing well enough. Can get better with experience. 

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

He will go up a clear level with a working, decent leg break to go with the stock googly, should work with Kumble or someone on this. In addition his body language and energy on the field are good things to have. 

Rashid Khan bowls googly 90% of the time as well. Bishnoi doesn't need to change much but his angles & add a flipper like Rashid that doesn't turns. 

 

Link to comment
37 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Rashid Khan bowls googly 90% of the time as well. Bishnoi doesn't need to change much but his angles & add a flipper like Rashid that doesn't turns. 

 

He has enough already to be a white ball specialist. If not a leg break then a good straighter one would also work. He could be a part of the test side eventually, who knows. 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, rollingstoned said:

He has enough already to be a white ball specialist. If not a leg break then a good straighter one would also work. He could be a part of the test side eventually, who knows. 

 

I am expecting a test call up. Talent is clearly visible. 

Link to comment

Performance of Indian Medium Pacers in international T20s in the last 2 years ( till 19.2.22 )  ....

 

 

Chahar ....

 

Wickets per match .... 0.78

Economy rate .... 9.7

 

 

 

 

Bhuvi ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.00

Economy rate .... 6.7

 

 

 

 

Harshal ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.5

Economy rate .... 8.9

 

 

----  Chahar has been poor both in terms of wickets taking ability and Economy rate

----  Bhuvi  has been poor in terms of wickets taking ability ( especially considering the fact that he has a Wickets per match of 0.82 excluding 3 matches against weak SL )

----  Bhuvi has a good ER and bowled a great death over in the last game 

----  Harshal is expensive too albeit sample size is low. But he is easily hittable and that ER may increase when the novelty factor wears off.

----  Harshal has a good wickets per match ratio but most of his wickets come when batsmen try to hit in the death overs.

 

 

 

In a nutshell, none of the medium pacers have justified their inclusion in the team as pure bowlers.

 

So, why pick 3 such medium pacers  ????

 

Why not look for pacers ....

 

....  One pacer who can bowl 90 mph+ with white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

.... One pacer who gets steep bounce and has white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

....  One pacer with batting ability at No.8

and white ball skills too

 

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
25 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Performance of Indian Medium Pacers in international T20s in the last 2 years ( till 19.2.22 )  ....

 

 

Chahar ....

 

Wickets per match .... 0.78

Economy rate .... 9.7

 

 

 

 

Bhuvi ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.00

Economy rate .... 6.7

 

 

 

 

Harshal ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.5

Economy rate .... 8.9

 

 

----  Chahar has been poor both in terms of wickets taking ability and Economy rate

----  Bhuvi  has been poor in terms of wickets taking ability ( especially considering the fact that he has a Wickets per match of 0.82 excluding 3 matches against weak SL )

----  Bhuvi has a good ER and bowled a great death over in the last game 

----  Harshal is expensive too albeit sample size is low. But he is easily hittable and that ER may increase when the novelty factor wears off.

----  Harshal has a good wickets per match ratio but most of his wickets come when batsmen try to hit in the death overs.

 

 

 

In a nutshell, none of the medium pacers have justified their inclusion in the team as pure bowlers.

 

So, why pick 3 such medium pacers  ????

 

Why not look for pacers ....

 

....  One pacer who can bowl 90 mph+ with white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

.... One pacer who gets steep bounce and has white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

....  One pacer with batting ability at No.8

and white ball skills too

 

 

It is too much to expect this from Chetan Sharma and Co.Let them do their job to best of their abilities.

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Performance of Indian Medium Pacers in international T20s in the last 2 years ( till 19.2.22 )  ....

 

 

Chahar ....

 

Wickets per match .... 0.78

Economy rate .... 9.7

 

 

 

 

Bhuvi ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.00

Economy rate .... 6.7

 

 

 

 

Harshal ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.5

Economy rate .... 8.9

 

 

----  Chahar has been poor both in terms of wickets taking ability and Economy rate

----  Bhuvi  has been poor in terms of wickets taking ability ( especially considering the fact that he has a Wickets per match of 0.82 excluding 3 matches against weak SL )

----  Bhuvi has a good ER and bowled a great death over in the last game 

----  Harshal is expensive too albeit sample size is low. But he is easily hittable and that ER may increase when the novelty factor wears off.

----  Harshal has a good wickets per match ratio but most of his wickets come when batsmen try to hit in the death overs.

 

 

 

In a nutshell, none of the medium pacers have justified their inclusion in the team as pure bowlers.

 

So, why pick 3 such medium pacers  ????

 

Why not look for pacers ....

 

....  One pacer who can bowl 90 mph+ with white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

.... One pacer who gets steep bounce and has white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

....  One pacer with batting ability at No.8

and white ball skills too

 

Chahar as 4th or 5th pacer is absolutely perfect. 3rd pacer has to be someone who can bat and get wickets. We have none. 10 and 11 should be premium bowlers. 

Link to comment

We need a strike bowler to partner Bumrah in Australia.  Bhuvi is neither of the two.  He will be smashed we all know that.  So I don't know why we are wasting time with him again. 

Avesh/Siraj must get games.  I see Jadeja will sneak into the XI ahead of Sundar so we have one spinner who is complete dud..

One among Chahal/Bishnoi will be there. 

 

This is what Rohit Dravid combo of WT20 in Australia will be if we go by what we are seeing:

Jadeja

Harshal/Chahar

Bhuvi

Bumrah 

Chahal

 

This is a grim looking attack coz I don't know we will pick many wickets with this combo. 

You won't chase 170+ everytime in Australia in a World cup especially in MCG.  We need strike bowlers at least 2 in pace department.  

Link to comment
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

Performance of Indian Medium Pacers in international T20s in the last 2 years ( till 19.2.22 )  ....

 

 

Chahar ....

 

Wickets per match .... 0.78

Economy rate .... 9.7

 

 

 

 

Bhuvi ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.00

Economy rate .... 6.7

 

 

 

 

Harshal ....

 

Wickets per match ....  1.5

Economy rate .... 8.9

 

 

----  Chahar has been poor both in terms of wickets taking ability and Economy rate

----  Bhuvi  has been poor in terms of wickets taking ability ( especially considering the fact that he has a Wickets per match of 0.82 excluding 3 matches against weak SL )

----  Bhuvi has a good ER and bowled a great death over in the last game 

----  Harshal is expensive too albeit sample size is low. But he is easily hittable and that ER may increase when the novelty factor wears off.

----  Harshal has a good wickets per match ratio but most of his wickets come when batsmen try to hit in the death overs.

 

 

 

In a nutshell, none of the medium pacers have justified their inclusion in the team as pure bowlers.

 

So, why pick 3 such medium pacers  ????

 

Why not look for pacers ....

 

....  One pacer who can bowl 90 mph+ with white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

.... One pacer who gets steep bounce and has white ball skills like yorkers and slower balls

....  One pacer with batting ability at No.8

and white ball skills too

 

"This is a very likeable attack",they (majority here)have a habit of kneeling down by presenting these trundlers in the name of batting "ability"

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...