Mark Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Personal abuse is an offence under level 2 of ICC.But i guess English can abuse the Indians.No wrong there. So basically the judge believed Andersons and English teams words that Anderson pushed Jadeja for self defence and hence no punishment.Word of an englishmen over an Indian is the norm.No issues there. No, the judge (1) couldn't decide who was telling the truth based on witness accounts and (2) imposed a high standard of proof due to the significant potential impact of a guilty verdict. When things don't go your way, it's not always due to racism. Stop being a victim.
vvvslaxman Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Nopez.Englishman is always right!!! What would you do if your get two contrasting accounts of a incident without any proof. Most of the physical contacts have evidence like sreesanth deliberately barged with Vaughn. If they present evidence and they ignored it I would totally agree.
vijay50 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 What would you do if your get two contrasting accounts of a incident without any proof. Most of the physical contacts have evidence like sreesanth deliberately barged with Vaughn. If they present evidence and they ignored it I would totally agree. Yeah, thats it. Unfortunately due to feck up camera in players walk out area Anderson got away scot free. Still doesnt explain why Boon would fine match fee for Jadeja. That sounds racist.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 6, 2014 Author Posted August 6, 2014 No, the judge (1) couldn't decide who was telling the truth based on witness accounts and (2) imposed a high standard of proof due to the significant potential impact of a guilty verdict. When things don't go your way, it's not always due to racism. Stop being a victim. Which part of Umpire Oxenford said that Anderson was abusing and he had to stop him and Anderson accepting that he abused Jadeja is not proof?
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 6, 2014 Author Posted August 6, 2014 What would you do if your get two contrasting accounts of a incident without any proof. Most of the physical contacts have evidence like sreesanth deliberately barged with Vaughn. If they present evidence and they ignored it I would totally agree. Anderson accepted that he pushed JAdeja but he presented the lame excuse of self defence. The judge accepted that lame excuse.Why because the excuse came from the English team.
Temujin Khaghan Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Cricket is white man's game Porn is white woman's territory everything else is a fetish and perversion from normal :giggle:
G_B_ Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 sunny calm down India followed the right path. Do you want The BCCI to be judge jury and executioner?
asterix Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 The best way to tackle Andu is now to give him back right there on the field , if he says something... Both the infield batsmen should join together and create a scene, every time he chirps... He's pretty aware that people will be watching him now... He can escape once but not every time... Disintegrate him mentally... But, there shouldn't be any obligation to select Jaddu in the team, just because of this controversy...
mishra Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 You sow what you reap. When Haroon Lorgat row broke no one thought that some days Yours truly ECB will spit on BCCI face.Now there are 3 Super Powers in Cricket and other two have a long bilateral history.
The Realist Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Dhoni's art of craptaincy: "I did something that was right and I stand for what's right and what's wrong," Dhoni said. "If something wrong is happening, I will go against it, irrespective of who is doing it. If one of my players gets fined and if he has not crossed the line I will definitely go and defend him. If he has crosses that line I won't come with him, and he will have to face the consequences alone." :facepalm:
beetle Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Chullu bhar paani for Don Srini Mama..... Ghar mein Sher....blah blah bheegi billi...
SLICKR392 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 I still don't get what Anderson was trying to defend himself from.
Mark Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Which part of Umpire Oxenford said that Anderson was abusing and he had to stop him and Anderson accepting that he abused Jadeja is not proof? Find out here: http://www.espncricinfo.com/england-v-india-2014/content/story/766611.html
vijay50 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Srini Mama doesnt care about Dhoni anymore since he moved to ICC.
vijay50 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 The best way to tackle Andu is now to give him back right there on the field , if he says something... Both the infield batsmen should join together and create a scene, every time he chirps... He's pretty aware that people will be watching him now... He can escape once but not every time... Disintegrate him mentally... But, there shouldn't be any obligation to select Jaddu in the team, just because of this controversy... All the players should make life hell for Andu when he comes to bat.
express bowling Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 I wonder how the dice would have rolled if Jadeja was accused of pushing Anderson !
express bowling Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 If there is no neutral evidence of what happened, why did Boon penalize Jadeja ? Why did the English camp try to stop the Indian camp from going forward with the accusation if they had nothing to fear ?
FischerTal Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 srini mama power is waning how will he hit back? :hmmm:
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 6, 2014 Author Posted August 6, 2014 Seems like Media are making a big storm out of this.Hope BCCI is forced to do something here.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now