Jump to content

Which was the best innings ever in a world cup ?


Which was the best innings ever in a world cup ?  

  1. 1.

    • Kapil Dev-175-in 1983
    • Viv Richards-181 in 1987
    • Inzamam Ul Haq-60 in 1992 semi-final
    • Sachin Tendulkar 98 at Centurion in 2003
    • Ricky Ponting 140 in 2003 final
    • Adam Gilchrist 149 in 2007 final
    • Clive Lloyd 102 in 1975 final
    • Alvin Kalicharan 78 in 1975
      0
    • Sunil Gavaskar 103 v New Zealand in 1987
      0
    • Scott Stryris 141 v Sri Lanka in 2007


Recommended Posts

Posted
Aravinda's 66 in the semi-final was better than his knock in the final.
Technically,considering the wicket I agree.HoweverI have considered occasion.I almost put his 66 ahead of his final century.
Posted
Steve Waugh 1999 World Cup ton against South Africa was the best in my opinion.
The best innings in a run chase.Never has there been greater mental strength and organization displayed in an innings in arun chase.Sorry.mistake not to add it in my poll.I place it the 2nd best ever world cup knock.
Posted
Kapil dev. No body else had to absorb as much pressure Dev did. He walked in at 9/4 and soon it become 17/5. India were in danger of being bowled out for a sub 100 score and an immediate exit from the WC. That would have been very embarrassing. Kapil dev is known to go after the bowling from the word go, but in this match he played a uncharacteristic knock, and played very sedately till the 45th over or so. Kapil started flaying the bowling only during the last 15 overs, and played sensibly and carefully for nearly 35 overs in the middle. Shows how much he is capable of, if he makes up his mind. Too bad that his stats don't reflect his true abilities with the bat, or the ball. Even at the 45 over mark, India was not out of the woods with the score on 145/8, but Kapil dev was in such flow that Kirmani and Kapil added 126 runs in 16 overs at the end, with Kapil plundering around 100 runs from the last 40 balls he faced. (infact, no other batsman save Richards was capable of playing like this in the 80s) Even with that Herculean effort from Kapil, the match was close and Zimbabwe were in the hunt till they went down fighting and reached 235. A lesser effort from Kapil would have meant sure defeat and exit from the WC before reaching the semifinal. The only argument that may be raised against Kapil's innings is that it came against Zimbabwe, a minnow team. But Zimbabwe team of the 80s was no push over. They beat Australia in their first match in WC 83 and reduced a strong Indian batting line up to 17/5. Their bowling was suited for the English conditions, and they troubled all teams except WI during WC 83. Anyway, once your team is down 17/5, it no longer matters whether the opponent is a minnow or not - the threat of your being bowled out for a sub 50 or sub 100 score is very real at that point, and a great knock in that situation is equal to a great knock against any other top team.
Technically was not Kalicharan's 78 in 1975 or Tendulkar's 98 in 2003 better?
Posted
Technically was not Kalicharan's 78 in 1975 or Tendulkar's 98 in 2003 better?
How can we judge technicality when we do not have any video of Kapil Dev's inning.
Posted
Technically was not Kalicharan's 78 in 1975 or Tendulkar's 98 in 2003 better?
Those were knocks played by batsmen from great and established teams. Kapil's boys were close to minnows (having won a solitary WC match against East Africa before 83) and the London bookies offered them 66:1 odds before the tournament began. Do you think Bangladesh will win WC 2015? India's chances in 1983 weren't very different. Kapil's knock wasn't merely a match win. It was the turning point of the tournament, the boys believed they had a chance only at this point. India which was a ODI minnow till then suddenly became a strong team, winning the Asia cup and B & H in succession. Till Kapil played that knock Indian ODI team was essentially made up of "test match players" who depended on luck to win ODI matches. Kapil was instrumental in making Indians believe that they can win games. Kapil did that through example, with both bat and ball, and that 175 was the highlight of his career. We got players like Tendulkar because Kapil had electrified the Indian cricket scene, following 83 WC. Kapil's knock transformed Indian cricket completely, and hence World cricket also. Did the two other knocks you mentioned have a similar impact on the game? Think about it.
Posted
Fleming's knock against RSA in 2003 was also an absolute stunner.
Picth was super flat.symmonds ton against pak and ross Taylor's 140 odd were brute innings !!
Posted
What about Ganguly's 183. That game too was a virtual knock out and it holds the most runs in an ODI innings in world cup record.
Kirsten made 188 in 96 WC
Posted
Kirsten made 188 in 96 WC
Against U.A.E....I actually watched most of the innings and it was the most boring 150+ score ever made in a ODI...Even if he had gotten a 200 that day it was :sleep: worthy Best part about the match was Donald vs the UAE captain without a helmet :cantstop: I am getting world cup fever...lot of memories coming back :dance:
Posted
Against U.A.E....I actually watched most of the innings and it was the most boring 150+ score ever made in a ODI...Even if he had gotten a 200 that day it was :sleep: worthy Best part about the match was Donald vs the UAE captain without a helmet :cantstop: I am getting world cup fever...lot of memories coming back :dance:
Yeah just corrected what Number said

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...