Jump to content

Most likely upset in the QFs?


Sid

Most likely upset in the QFs?  

  1. 1.

    • Bangbros beating Ind
    • Pakis beating Aus
    • Windies beating NZ
    • No Upsets


Recommended Posts

Posted

I would say WI beating NZ. WI on their day can be extremely dangerous. At the moment though, I just get the feeling that they are just not motivated enough to play good cricket. Contract disputes, deserving players (Bravo, Pollard) not being picked is weighing alot on their performances. But, if they can get their act together, they can beat many top teams.

Posted
I would say WI beating NZ. WI on their day can be extremely dangerous. At the moment though' date=' I just get the feeling that they are just not motivated enough to play good cricket. Contract disputes, [b']deserving players (Bravo, Pollard) not being picked is weighing alot on their performances. But, if they can get their act together, they can beat many top teams.
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted

SL should defeat Sa on current form. India, if it takes Bangla lightly can pay the price. Pak pacers can do it for them, Australia are prone to succumbing to over aggressive batting. West Indies have the big hitters who can easily clear the short boundaries and put Nz under scoreboard pressure but they must negotiate the early swing for that.

Posted

It will be Ind vs Aus Nzl vs Srl Agree with most SA vs Srl might turn out to be toss dependent.But SA even choke when they bat first.And Srl have shown they are excellent chasers and big game players.So dont think even a 300 chase will scare them unlike Saffers Srl should be huge favs for that game imo

Posted
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Yeah right.... Pollard is not more deserving than Dwayne Smith :shot:
Posted

My take:- South Africa v Sri Lanka England, SL, WI are the only teams that has lost to SA in a ICC knockout match. And SL's bowling is not good enough. And other than Dilshan and Sanga, no one is threatening in SL's batting unit. So I think SA has a slight edge in this match. If they bat first they have a good chance to win. Eventhough history and SL bowlers and their middle order works in SA's favor, SA will still choke and Sri Lanka will be through to the Semi final. I guess Dilshan will score a 100 and the match is gonna be like theirs in 2009 Champions Trophy match. India v Bangladesh Only way it's possible for Bangladesh to win is if India posts something around 250 while batting first. Bangladesh have some pretty good chasers. But I don't think they have bowlers to restrict us to 250 so India wins this one. Australia v Pakistan However slim is the odds, I predict a rematch of 1999 WC group match and Pakistan goes through to semis. I still feel Australia and its batting is over rated. Their batting can crumble against genuine pace bowling. New Zealand v West Indies WI have a decent chance of winning only if they bats first and post around 315. I don't think that is happening and my pick is New Zealand.

Posted
Sri lanka vs West Indies and India vs Pakistan :hysterical:
Replace WI with NZ, which is the most likely thing to happen, you get 2011 rematches.. :dance:
Posted
Windies beating NZ is possible. One innings from Gayle' date=' Simmons or Samuels can make the difference.[/quote'] You forgot Charles Johnson. WI should open with Gayle and Johnson and drop Dwayne Smith for NZ match.
Posted
My take:- Australia v Pakistan However slim is the odds, I predict a rematch of 1999 WC group match and Pakistan goes through to semis. I still feel Australia and its batting is over rated. Their batting can crumble against genuine pace bowling.
In cricket anything could happen, however some points to consider: Cons for Pak * Pakistan's fielding - Dropped catches could prove fatal * Pakistan's bowling - They have enjoyed success by bowling short. However, at Adelaide, Aus would love to face short bowling (short side boundaries as well). Porterfield was brilliant vs. Pak, Aus has many Porterfields * Pakistan's batting - Haven't performed well against quality attacks. Sarfaraz has been a good addition, but can he perform in 3 games in a row and under KO pressure has to be seen :hmmmm: Cons for Aus * Pressure - The ability to handle pressure in KO games is unproven. Aus has not won many ICC KO since CT 2009, iirc * Aus batting - Look's great on paper but we saw what happened vs. NZ. A few good balls by Pak can turn the game Overall, I think Pak will have to have an extraordinarily great game or Aus a bad one for an upset to happen - you gave the example of 1999 group game, however it could turn out to be like the 1999 final too :dontknow:
Posted
Kiwis are a big risk of being knocked out...
India has the saloon passage through to the semis, all other teams in the qtrs are capable of making it if the favourites have a bad day.
Posted
India has the saloon passage through to the semis' date=' all other teams in the qtrs are capable of making it if the favourites have a bad day.[/quote'] You would have had a saloon passage as well but you chose not to be number 1 in the group :winky:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...