bulbul Posted December 15, 2015 Posted December 15, 2015 Noida: A 26-year-old woman filed a police complaint against her husband of four months on Tuesday after he sent her a talaq over email, alleging he had done so because she was dark-skinned. The talaq, she claimed, came three days after she told him she was pregnant on December 5. Sana Yasmin (name changed), who works as a research assistant at a Noidabased pharma firm, said her husband, a software engineer aged around 35, had humiliated her for the colour of her skin from the first day of marriage, and that he had made plain to her his preference for a `fair-skinned' bride. Her husband, however, said he had given a talaq as Sana suffered from a serious health problem that her family had hidden at the time of marriage. Sana rubbished his claim. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Dark-skinned-wife-gets-email-talaq/articleshow/50180469.cms
coffee_rules Posted December 15, 2015 Posted December 15, 2015 Bah..the majority has no right to say how to live their lives to minorities. If you have any doubts clarify with our expert, Malini Parthasarathy..
bihutoli Posted December 15, 2015 Posted December 15, 2015 Did he send the email thrice? Will this topic be posted thrice as well?
amiret Posted December 15, 2015 Posted December 15, 2015 do u have to create 2 threads for every news item you come across ?
bulbul Posted December 15, 2015 Author Posted December 15, 2015 I created only one thread But why some people face palming thread instead of subject?
Cricket_Hacker Posted December 15, 2015 Posted December 15, 2015 Mashallah Digital India program doing great
Debutant Posted December 15, 2015 Posted December 15, 2015 I created only one thread But why some people face palming thread instead of subject? Because it has nothing to do with the terrorist RSS or the intolerant hindus
Mariyam Posted December 18, 2015 Posted December 18, 2015 Did he send the email thrice? Will this topic be posted thrice as well?That is indeed a pertinent question. Is sending 3 different emails necessary or could he have sent talaq x3 in the same email?Wonder what the hadees have to say about this?
Brainfade Posted December 18, 2015 Posted December 18, 2015 Even if the dude is telling the truth that he did it because she has an illness, he must be condemned. She needs his support, not his talaaq.
rkt.india Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 Even if the dude is telling the truth that he did it because she has an illness, he must be condemned. She needs his support, not his talaaq. He is saying they didn't tell him about her illness before marriage. So who is at fault? should he still be obligated to support her?
Vilander Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 why was her face closed when he got married to her, couldn't he see her then ?..oh wait. damn.
Ironhide Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 He is a secular dude, no need of tarnishing his name.
Texy Posted December 20, 2015 Posted December 20, 2015 I am looking for a dark skinned wife.Want to marry apna Slickr?
panther Posted December 20, 2015 Posted December 20, 2015 Want to marry apna Slickr? I don't want to get done for love jihad
bulbul Posted December 21, 2015 Author Posted December 21, 2015 I am looking for a dark skinned wife.Burka is black right?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
panther Posted December 21, 2015 Posted December 21, 2015 Burka is black right?Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkPrefer brown
bulbul Posted December 21, 2015 Author Posted December 21, 2015 Prefer brownGood choice for a burka...Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Brainfade Posted December 21, 2015 Posted December 21, 2015 He is saying they didn't tell him about her illness before marriage. So who is at fault? should he still be obligated to support her?Yes. Do you just abandon someone you married? The mature thing to do is to support her, but ask the in-laws to pitch in some for her treatments. It is ridiculously inhumane to simply kick her out when what she needs is someone to help her. What if she was diagnosed a day after the wedding? Surely, he'd be obligated then. I don't see the difference.
Recommended Posts