Forever Indian Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Why are there only 3 pure bowlers and Pandya on this flat deck? There should have been one more bowler for sure. Now the likes of Herwardkar, Shreyas Iyer and Panchal are being bowled. What poor selection...
Sidhoni Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) Getting both openers early on a flat deck is something I would not expect of our first team pacers. Well done Saini. Btw it looks like they really went after Nadeem. Edited February 17, 2017 by Sidhoni
Sidhoni Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Shaun Marsh retires after getting his 100 and his brother replaces him
flat_wicket_bully Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Pandya gets handscomb for 45 Sidhoni 1
gakgupta Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 14 minutes ago, Forever Indian said: Why are there only 3 pure bowlers and Pandya on this flat deck? There should have been one more bowler for sure. Now the likes of Herwardkar, Shreyas Iyer and Panchal are being bowled. What poor selection... Cheap idea by BCCI to play them against mediacore bowling in the practice game
express bowling Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) 54 minutes ago, Forever Indian said: Why are there only 3 pure bowlers and Pandya on this flat deck? There should have been one more bowler for sure. Now the likes of Herwardkar, Shreyas Iyer and Panchal are being bowled. What poor selection... Looks like the Aussies are not being given much practice against spin. Even the pitch has a bit of green tinge. Edited February 17, 2017 by express bowling Mosher 1
Forever Indian Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 39 minutes ago, gakgupta said: Cheap idea by BCCI to play them against mediacore bowling in the practice game 1 minute ago, express bowling said: Looks like the Aussies are not being given practice against good spinners. Even the pitch has a bit of green tinge. Don't think that's the case, if so even Nadeem would not be playing. Agree on pitch though, there would have been a conscious effort to not give a spinning pitch.
Forever Indian Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) Seems like Saini is injured now. So now we have 1 frontline pacer in Dinda for the match Edited February 17, 2017 by Forever Indian
MCcricket Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Looks like Dundaa was injured n not Saini as he seems to have bowled later n Dundaa did not
Forever Indian Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Just now, MCcricket said: Looks like Dundaa was injured n not Saini as he seems to have bowled later n Dundaa did not No, Dunda has bowled an over, Saini has not I think.
flat_wicket_bully Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Australia - 327/3 at the end of first day. And yes Dinda bowled an over. Saini is injured
The Realist Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 33 next month. Nice to see the selectors blooding in the youngsters gradually. Probably needs an overseas A tour before stepping up to the senior team... Mosher 1
Forever Indian Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 11 minutes ago, The Realist said: 33 next month. Nice to see the selectors blooding in the youngsters gradually. Probably needs an overseas A tour before stepping up to the senior team... Well, he is always a cut above the others.
vishalvirsingh Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 5 hours ago, rkt.india said: highlights here http://www.cricket.com.au/video/australia-india-a-match-highlights-video-live-stream-smith-warner-test-series/2017-02-17 dinda was worse, slow and unimpressive , Navdeep is not international standards kinda like BHuvi, bk looks international standards only on favourable tracks .hardik was probably the fastest but has to improve more to ever think of playing in tests ......
kira Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 3 hours ago, BCCI said: Steve Smith helps himself to another 100.The eternal barnacle.Looking forward to Smith vs Ashwin. His last 100 on Indian soil ever
PBN Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 8 hours ago, rkt.india said: Pandya has bowled with the new ball even for India and has picked up wickets up front so I do not see any issue why he should not have opened. Yes, Pandya has opened the bowling for India in ODIs. This is first class cricket and I would see Pandya as a 3rd/4th seamer. Plus this was a practice match and would have preferred someone like Mhd Siraj or some of the other upcoming pacers opening the bowling.
Pollack Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Smith's infatuation with Indian bowlers continues.
express bowling Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) Selectors need to identify pacers who have realistic chances of playing for India in the near future ( keeping in mind the format ) ..... and play only those pacers in A teams. Test prospects for 2 to 5 day A-team games LOI prospects for one day A-team games. We have seen Aniket C, Saini, Pandya, ( Good picks ) and Chama, Dinda and Siraj ( Bad picks ) in the 2 and 3 day A-team games. Shardul, Aaron, Warrier, Rajpoot have missed out. We have seen Sangwan ( good pick ) Nehra, Mohit, Kaul ( questionable picks ) and Vinay, Dinda, ( bad picks ) for the one day A-team games. Nathu, Rajpoot, Warrier have missed out. Why not go for only the pacers who are next in line ? Why pick pacers who have no chance of representing India in the near future ? A-team games are for player development. Edited February 17, 2017 by express bowling Mosher and PBN 2
Laaloo Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 8 hours ago, rkt.india said: People have no idea about player development. But they will be the first ones to moan and whine that we cant develop players
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now