Jump to content

If not Modi, then who?

Malcolm Merlyn

By Malcolm Merlyn
in Chit Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

randomGuy Mentor

randomGuy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Vilander said:

lol seems your are too thick to learn. Live for as long as you please in a fools paradise, while you are at it when you head down to Bangalore next time for your bread and butter, try telling a local there that he must learn Hindi as its the national language. Do come back and post your experience. 

You are too thick to understand a joke...even when the post has a joke sign at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vilander Mentor

Vilander

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, randomGuy said:

You are too thick to understand a joke...even when the post has a joke sign at the end.

sorry i have been trying to reason with too many brainwashed bigots who have a revisionist agenda without knowing it as one and live in a peaceful world of complete ignorance, to care to distinguish a joke from a rhetoric. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Muloghonto Mentor

Muloghonto

Posted
Posted
On 7/6/2017 at 11:27 PM, Malcolm Merlyn said:

The leftists the liberals the so called seculars complaint about Modi all the time.Anything happens anywhere in India its his fault.So if not Modi then who is the alternative to lead India.

 

Discuss

I am a liberal and Modi is fine. He's already shrugged off Hinduvta pressure from VHP, which is a good thing. India is not a Hindu nation and India should pursue secularism in the form of excising religion from ALL government function than trying to accommodate ALL religions in the government. Secularism means seperation of religion and state. And that is how it should be, because ethos from half-literate stone age gurus and prophets who knew less than grade 7s know today, is no template for running a nation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vilander Mentor

Vilander

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

I am a liberal and Modi is fine. He's already shrugged off Hinduvta pressure from VHP, which is a good thing. India is not a Hindu nation and India should pursue secularism in the form of excising religion from ALL government function than trying to accommodate ALL religions in the government. Secularism means seperation of religion and state. And that is how it should be, because ethos from half-literate stone age gurus and prophets who knew less than grade 7s know today, is no template for running a nation.

 

precisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mishra Mentor

mishra

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

I am a liberal and Modi is fine. He's already shrugged off Hinduvta pressure from VHP, which is a good thing. India is not a Hindu nation and India should pursue secularism in the form of excising religion from ALL government function than trying to accommodate ALL religions in the government. Secularism means seperation of religion and state. And that is how it should be, because ethos from half-literate stone age gurus and prophets who knew less than grade 7s know today, is no template for running a nation.

 

Lol. He is chaddhidhari

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Muloghonto Mentor

Muloghonto

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, mishra said:

Lol. He is chaddhidhari

Only in name so far since becoming PM. Which is just fine. Stone age ethos must be crushed and eliminated, whether it masquerades as Hinduism, Islam or X-tinity or any other unsubstantiated moral code from unproven higher entity. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mishra Mentor

mishra

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Only in name so far since becoming PM. Which is just fine. Stone age ethos must be crushed and eliminated, whether it masquerades as Hinduism, Islam or X-tinity or any other unsubstantiated moral code from unproven higher entity. 

 

So is his most of cabinet. and cms of various states.

Prooves Chaddhidharis are better administrators, and relatively more honest with their country then allmost any libtard picked from Indian hisory

 

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted
On 7/9/2017 at 8:57 PM, Vilander said:

besides you can not ask any one to learn any language its an individuals prerogative and for legal official communications you have official languages 22 of them, nothing can change that people wont allow that to change. :bebored:

For legal communications with center, there are only 2 languages. Of these Hindi should ideally used internally, and English externally (English)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted
On 7/9/2017 at 9:26 PM, Vilander said:

if some politically convenient yogi ? becomes indian PM imagine his meetings with foreign blond reporters...lol more crazy **** than recent events with Modi...man it would be fun to read at least.

The more i read the posts from modi bhakts the more i believe they are similar to mullas. God save the country.

1. Ppl don't vote for their leaders considering how they would appear to blonds 

2. You are generalizing that all Mullahs are bad

 

You need to get your head examined :wink:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Muloghonto Mentor

Muloghonto

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, mishra said:

So is his most of cabinet. and cms of various states.

Prooves Chaddhidharis are better administrators, and relatively more honest with their country then allmost any libtard picked from Indian hisory

 

You can rant all you want like the goonda you are, but simple fact is, the best PM India has ever had (PVNR) and best Finance minister India has ever had (MMS) are both not Chaddis.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
someone Collaborator

someone

Posted
Posted

The Bihar episode should be a reminder of what will happen if there is a non-NDA government in power. It's corruption and, family-first agenda. Do we want that at national level? Full corruption, dynasty politics and secular media being silent on them, thus absolutely no accountability and little criticism there. Development issues are completely sidelined whenever there is corruption.  Today, we are talking about relevant issues like economic, jobs, and general development only because corruption is not there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mishra Mentor

mishra

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 11/07/2017 at 10:57 PM, Muloghonto said:

You can rant all you want like the goonda you are, but simple fact is, the best PM India has ever had (PVNR) and best Finance minister India has ever had (MMS) are both not Chaddis.

 

Name one achievement of that Government apart from change in Communist Congress economic policy? While credit be given where its due for finally breaking the shackles of Nehuruvian thinking, but liberalisation was never a pioneer/ingenious idea. 

 

Apart from liberalisation , whole period of his rule was fraught with corruption, High inflation (people here complain about demonetisation, need too see how Rao has to  sell high inflation on DD) and on and on. And offcourse sudden deaths of high profile Congressis

 

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tibarn Community Regular

Tibarn

Posted
Posted (edited)

Manmohan as the best finance minister India ever had :hysterical:

 

Guy who thinks "copy Scandinavia" is an economic policy is lecturing others on economics. There is no cure for shamelessness :facepalm:

 

@mishra you are wasting your time, this guy abused economists as pig-headed baniyas before. You won't get anything from him. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tibarn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Muloghonto Mentor

Muloghonto

Posted
Posted
On 7/14/2017 at 8:11 AM, mishra said:

Name one achievement of that Government apart from change in Communist Congress economic policy? While credit be given where its due for finally breaking the shackles of Nehuruvian thinking, but liberalisation was never a pioneer/ingenious idea. 

 

Apart from liberalisation , whole period of his rule was fraught with corruption, High inflation (people here complain about demonetisation, need too see how Rao has to  sell high inflation on DD) and on and on. And offcourse sudden deaths of high profile Congressis

 

that one achivement is bigger than the sum total of entire BJP's achievement in Indian politics and i say if as a former BJP voter (Former, because i can't vote in India anymore).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mishra Mentor

mishra

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

that one achivement is bigger than the sum total of entire BJP's achievement in Indian politics and i say if as a former BJP voter (Former, because i can't vote in India anymore).

 

Yes, I am extending your logic, Rajiv Gandhi bought computers in India. That one achievement should be considered bigger then everything in Indian education/economic sector, Because Murthy, Premji,Ratan, Raju they wouldnt have been nothing without that.  :facepalm:

 

Here, Check few graphs and have a feel of difference in growth rate and volumes to understand your chewtiyap generalisation.

http://www.firstpost.com/business/25-years-of-liberalisation-a-glimpse-of-indias-growth-in-14-charts-2877654.html

 

BTW, You do know that liberalisation was forced upon India because of IMF and whatever was done was bare minimum IMF conditions. Its later government specially the ones immediately after him which showed the faith and walked the mile.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tibarn Community Regular

Tibarn

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, someone said:

Nitish was the most acceptable face and now he's gone. So who is gonna be the opposition "face" in 2019?

 

Mamata Banerjee. She can win WB easily by herself. That's 30 seats guaranteed. 

Edited by Tibarn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...