Jump to content

Darwin's theory scientifically wrong: Union min Satyapal Singh


sarcastic

Recommended Posts

On a side note, surprising to see education regressing under the Hinduvta BJP. 

For years, their (only legitimate) gripe about 'Congressi Education' was that our history syllabus was too PC and too much minority appeasement. 

Sure, that is true. But history is history- a side note to knowledge and mostly, used/subverted by agenda-driven or insecure people to chest thump about long-dead illiterates from centuries ago. 
It doesn't actually matter to us, in our daily lives, whether Aryans came from outside, are Indians or aliens. 


But what this minister of higher education is doing, is American-esque, conservative denial of science and a categoric attempt to prop up religious nonsense, which has a very strong effect on people's daily lives. To deny evolution, is to basically deny the scientific process of speciation and the next logical step is insertion of illiterate ideologies dreamt up by people who's knowledge was less than our high-school kids.

A standard copy-cat conservative approach of the US being cut-pasted in the Indian context, with the irony that Hinduism itself is pretty soft on 'origin of species', with hardly any cannonical literature being overly emphatic about it. 

 

This is why, i say that Hinduvta is intellectually devoid of anything- its just cut-paste hodge podge of Islamism + conservative American-style christianity in a hindu context, thats it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Stradlater said:

Prove theory in court? 

Dude it has been proven countless times before by some of the leading scientists and academicians in the world. 

What next , Earth is held by Sheshnag and Quran has a detailed treatise on embryology? 

Apply the same let of rules to darwinian theory that liberandus have applied to Ram Mandir and you would be arguing in court for a 1000 yrs. 

I'm assuming you got triggered for the same reasons rest of the liberandus get triggered by such foot in mouth comments? 

 

Lets debate, how does the evolution debate affect (adversely or otherwise) the general discourse among hindus compared to desert cultists? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, surajmal said:

Apply the same let of rules to darwinian theory that liberandus have applied to Ram Mandir and you would be arguing in court for a 1000 yrs. 

There is far more evidence for Darwin's theory than Ram-mandir in Ayodhya. 

We have actually observed speciation in the last few years. 

Feel free to show any evidence of a temple in Ayodhya at the exact spot of the Babri masjid. 

2 minutes ago, surajmal said:

I'm assuming you got triggered for the same reasons rest of the liberandus get triggered by such foot in mouth comments? 

 

Lets debate, how does the evolution debate affect (adversely or otherwise) the general discourse among hindus compared to desert cultists? 

the irony is, it doesnt actually affect Hindus very much, but the Hinduvta copy-cats of their Western masters ( read: Islamists and conservative US-christians) cut-paste their master's position to Hinduvta without much thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

There is far more evidence for Darwin's theory than Ram-mandir in Ayodhya. 

We have actually observed speciation in the last few years. 

Feel free to show any evidence of a temple in Ayodhya at the exact spot of the Babri masjid. 

the irony is, it doesnt actually affect Hindus very much, but the Hinduvta copy-cats of their Western masters ( read: Islamists and conservative US-christians) cut-paste their master's position to Hinduvta without much thought. 

I don't have a biscuit for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chimpanzee genome decoded matches the humans upto 97.2%, proves we adapted better than apes. Since nobody has been alive for 10 mil years to witness, we have to believe in this theory that best fits the scientific methodology.  Quite appalling to hear somebody in power say such things. Modi himself should distance from utterances. .Dr. Batra types about ancient Indian plastic surgery advances using Lord Ganeshji AND kARNA as evidence.

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/pm-takes-leaf-from-batra-book-mahabharat-genetics-lord-ganesha-surgery/

 

 

 

 

Edited by coffee_rules
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Chimpanzee genome decoded matches the humans up to 97.2%, proves we adapted better than apes.  Evolution is not just evolving as proposed by Darwin, but adaptation of species to adverse conditions to survive better. Since nobody has been alive for 10 mil years to witness, we have to believe in this theory that best fits the scientific methodology of hypothesis/facts/proof and lateral review.  Quite appalling to hear somebody in power say such things. Modi himself should distance from utterances. .Dr. Batra types about ancient Indian plastic surgery advances using Lord Ganeshji AND kARNA as evidence.

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/pm-takes-leaf-from-batra-book-mahabharat-genetics-lord-ganesha-surgery/

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, surajmal said:

Apply the same let of rules to darwinian theory that liberandus have applied to Ram Mandir and you would be arguing in court for a 1000 yrs. 

I'm assuming you got triggered for the same reasons rest of the liberandus get triggered by such foot in mouth comments? 

 

Lets debate, how does the evolution debate affect (adversely or otherwise) the general discourse among hindus compared to desert cultists? 

I couldn't give two hoots about what Libtards do and think or the Hindutva fascists for that matter either. 

Just keep Science out of your useless , nonsensical debates. Science is the only truth there ever was or ever will be.Even our ancient rishis were aware of the fact and hence the reason why you see so much logic and rationality in their arguments esp the philosophical ones

 

And Evolution is the only natural phenomenon which explains everything from origin of life to its wide diversity and speciation to it's current status. Or as Theodosius Dobzhensky said "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution".

 

@Muloghontois right . These Hindutva morons have turned the Sanatan Dharma into a texas branch of presbyterianism and are the true real enemies of Hinduism whether you want to admit it or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2018 at 12:10 AM, sarcastic said:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/darwins-theory-scientifically-wrong-union-min-satyapal-singh/articleshow/62581675.cms

 

This is worrying!!! The ignorant among common people might as well think this guy is correct and we will start regressing sooner than later. I am not sure where this kind of right-wingers will take this country to.

 

What does a politician/police man know about Science and how can he utter such non-sense being an elected representative of people. 

Sad fact is, most of these people are morons. They feel as they're in powerful positions they're an established authority on all subjects.

 

This Surajmal fella sounds one of those die-hard Trump fans. Totally clueless but willing to attack anyone who attempts to point him in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sachinism said:

Sad fact is, most of these people are morons. They feel as they're in powerful positions they're an established authority on all subjects.

 

This Surajmal fella sounds one of those die-hard Trump fans. Totally clueless but willing to attack anyone who attempts to point him in the right direction.

He's a die-hard Bhakt - so reflexively will defend anything that's cloaked in BJP/RSS/"nationalist" garb - facts be damned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old times were better when in Pakistani schools and colleges and universities we used to read the Darwin Theory of Evolution. 

But today the syllabus has been changed. 

 

Although chapter of Darwin Theory is still present in the science books, but this chapter begins with statements like "Darwin's FALSE theory of Evolution".... and then comes: "It was Allah who created the universe in 6 days and 6 nights...." etc. 

I am afraid that Pakistani Schools/Colleges are not producing the science students who believe in Theory of Evolution, but they are producing the science students who believe in Theory of Creation. 

 

Actually, Khaibar Puktoonkhawa state (run by Imran Khan's party) is said to be introducing a whole chapter about the "Theory of Creation" in the science books soon. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the last species, which undergone Evolution, is "Dog". 

 

The oldest fossil of dog is only 15000 years old. 

 

Question for the creationists: "Why there is NO fossil records present of dogs which are older than 15000 years"? 

 

And we have thousands of fossils of wolves present which are as old as 1.5 million years. But strangely, there are no wolf fossil records present which are older than 1.5 million years. So the question for the Crationists is: "Why there are NO fossil records present of any wolf which are older than 1.5 million years?"

 

But we have many fossils of ONLY "Canis" type animals which are 1.5 million to 6 million years old. But there is No fossil records present of Canis which are older than 6 million years. Why?

 

And then we have fossils of ONLY "Canini" type of animals which are between 6 to 12 million years old. But why there is no fossil of Canini present which are older than 12 million years?

 

And then we have fossils of ONLY "Caniforms"  type of animals which are between 12 million to 43 million years old. But why there are no fossil records present of Caniforms which are older than 43 million years, while we have fossils of many mammals which are older to this date?

 

One could only wonder if the creationists are ever going to answer these questions. 

 

In case of humans too there are no fossil records present which are older than 200,000 years old. But still the creationists deny the evolution from human like apes, by claiming that Adam and Eve came directly from the heavens to the earth (after eating the forbidden fruit) and therefore we are unable to find human fossils which are older than 200,000 years old. 

 

But what excuse are the creationists going to present in case of the fossils of the dogs? Do the creationists believe that the "Adam of the Dogs" (i.e. the first male dog) also got deceived by the "Eve of dogs" (i.e. the first female dog) in eating the forbidden fruit in the heavens and thus as punishment sent directly to the world only 15000 years ago?

Edited by Alam_dar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...