Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

that was not attempted  yorker. that was a perfect yorker, landed absolutely the blockhole but that shot was just amazing.

For a yorker to be perfect, it has to land under the bottom of the bat.

 

If the batsman manages to place his bat under the ball, which landed on a supposedly perfect yorker length, then it is not a perfect yorker.

 

A yorker is defined in relation to the bat of the batsman at the time of hitting and is not a predefined length.

Posted
2 minutes ago, express bowling said:

For a yorker to be perfect, it has to land under the bottom of the bat.

 

If the batsman manages to place his bat under the ball, which landed on a supposedly perfect yorker length, then it is not a perfect yorker.

 

A yorker is defined in relation to the bat of the batsman at the time of hitting and is not a predefined length.

He made it look like that. he did not get the bat under the ball.  he sliced it with an open bat. perfect yorker doesn't mean it is unhittable just need real good shot to hit it.

Posted
6 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Did they show the list of quickest balls on TV  ?

3.6 J Archer to AB de Villiers, FOUR, 152.4 km/h good length on middle stump.

 

bowled today

Posted
3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

3.6 J Archer to AB de Villiers, FOUR, 152.4 km/h good length on middle stump.

 

bowled today

 

I saw that speed on IPL T20.com too.

 

What I was asking you was ...

 

Since this is the fastest ball of this IPL, did they show the list of fastest bowlers on TV, like they did when Stanlake bowled the quickest earlier  ?

 

Mavi and Siraj would get a bit of attention too then, as they are 3rd and 4th on the list.

Posted
1 minute ago, express bowling said:

 

I saw that speed on IPL T20.com too.

 

What I was asking you was ...

 

Since this is the fastest ball of this IPL, did they show the list of fastest bowlers on TV, like they did when Stanlake bowled the quickest earlier  ?

 

Mavi and Siraj would get a bit of attention too then, as they are 3rd and 4th on the list.

no, they didnt

Posted
35 minutes ago, SandeepMotta said:

Sad to see Khaleel not even get a single game. Sandeep sharma will be hit out of the park in the crucial matches.

SRH is a useless team

Posted
2 hours ago, Mosher said:

Umesh has taken wickets of consecutive deliveries 4 times this IPL. He should have converted atleast one into a hat-trick. 

He is one Indian pacer who we can boast of this IPL. The only highlight among Indian pacers. Enjoyed his spells. His accuracy has been very impressive in about 9 matches. 

Posted

Looks like SRH wanted to make sure that most of these potential desi bowlers go to other teams and made them to keep picking unadkat's dhawal's kind.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

He is one Indian pacer who we can boast of this IPL. The only highlight among Indian pacers. Enjoyed his spells. His accuracy has been very impressive in about 9 matches. 

yes and the enabler Nehra should get most of the credit. We may even see Nehra getting the role of B Arun in our team or a specific fast bowler's coach role. Kohli could just make it happen.

Edited by Vk1
×
×
  • Create New...