Jump to content

What if we won the toss for all 8 tests in South Africa and England this year?


SecondSlip

Recommended Posts

Posted

What if Pujara had not scored a century in the first innings? We would have probably been all out for double figures and lost the match in an embarrassing manner. So "what ifs" can go either way.

Posted
32 minutes ago, nevada said:

What if Pujara had not scored a century in the first innings? We would have probably been all out for double figures and lost the match in an embarrassing manner. So "what ifs" can go either way.

Pujara batted for around 300 balls?  In first and second innings together.  300 events where he did not get out. Virat lost 7 tosses. 7 events.  

It's not the same probability. Not comparable. 

Of India won more tosses results would have been different for sure. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, nevada said:

What if Pujara had not scored a century in the first innings? We would have probably been all out for double figures and lost the match in an embarrassing manner. So "what ifs" can go either way.

Pujara batted for around 300 balls?  In first and second innings together.  300 events where he did not get out. Virat lost 7 tosses. 7 events.  

It's not the same probability. Not comparable. 

Of India won more tosses results would have been different for sure. 

Posted

We would have won more tests easily ,I have said this before ,the Indian batsmen go in a shell under any sort of scoreboard pressure when batting second or last ,they just dint play freely as compared to when they bat first. 

Nowadays almost all the teams are toss dependent 

Posted
2 hours ago, SecondSlip said:

Could we have won both series? 

You have to play well to win. Take Pujara’s performance out and Ind could have lost at Adelaide 

Posted

Most probably. Having  said that it should not happen at all. Then what is the purpose of playing itself?  Winning tosses should even out generally. That's why  i finds ENG's recent records a bit inflated. Won lots of tosses and there by matches. In ind,  vs IND in ENG , in SL they  won most of the tosses.

 

Posted
In SA may be, not in Eng. In Eng more than toss, Sam Curran was the difference and Ind batting bar Kohli was in poor form 
Batting first Tail Always Scores more rather than chasing under pressure.If India Won Toss It Easily would have been 4-1

Sent from my Nokia 7 plus using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, CG said:

Batting first Tail Always Scores more rather than chasing under pressure.If India Won Toss It Easily would have been 4-1

Sent from my Nokia 7 plus using Tapatalk
 

really did you watch yesterday's match ? last 4 wickets scored close to 140 runs 

Posted
really did you watch yesterday's match ? last 4 wickets scored close to 140 runs 
Adelaide wicket generally slows down and Becomes Good For batting.India Almost Chased 350 last time.In Modern Cricket Toss is Huge Hardly Anybody Can Chase 220+

Sent from my Nokia 7 plus using Tapatalk

Posted
34 minutes ago, CG said:

Adelaide wicket generally slows down and Becomes Good For batting.India Almost Chased 350 last time.In Modern Cricket Toss is Huge Hardly Anybody Can Chase 220+

Sent from my Nokia 7 plus using Tapatalk
 

just in context of that ENG series, you couldnt be suer if we batted fisrt all tests we would have won. Toss plays a role but not when reasons for defeats were much deeper.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...