Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 16 hours ago, express bowling said: Pant averages 43.5 with the bat after 16 tests. 6 scores of 89 + ... 4 such scores in SENA. And the sample size is not small at all. How was he being compared to Afridi !!!! Most importantly he avg 73 in 4th innings of a test match , add to that avg of 62 in Aus facing starc, cummins, lyon, hazelwood Pre mature ejaculation , ppl get that with most youngsters . Link to comment
DeepSpace Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Now it’s a insult to Pant to be compared to a cheat and a hack. Although when Afridi first came on the scene, he could bat quite a bit. Link to comment
TNAmarkFromIndia Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 18 hours ago, express bowling said: Pant averages 43.5 with the bat after 16 tests. 6 scores of 89 + ... 4 such scores in SENA. And the sample size is not small at all. How was he being compared to Afridi !!!! LOIs. Link to comment
R!TTER Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 He's more like Sehwag, also like Sehwag I bet he'll have a brilliant test career & relatively mediocre LO one. Link to comment
Soldier Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 2 hours ago, DeepSpace said: Now it’s a insult to Pant to be compared to a cheat and a hack. Although when Afridi first came on the scene, he could bat quite a bit. This lmao. Hahaha. Already a. Future ATG. Being compared to that fodder dud called Shahid. Link to comment
neel roy Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Just see his signature Jimmy Cliff and Adamant 2 Link to comment
Angelarai Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 Afridi has different style similar to Sehwag but he was not consistent. Link to comment
RajBan Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 25 minutes ago, Angelarai said: Afridi has different style similar to Sehwag but he was not consistent. Afridi and Sehwag are not similar batsman. Sehwag's hand eye coordination is of legendary proportion. He single handedly changed the conventional wisdom that you can't be successful in Tests without having proper technique and footwork against fast bowling. Afridi is more about brute power as opposed to timing or technique. Even mishits used to go for sixes at times, partly similar to Andre Russell in that regard , either miss or hit. Afridi's main value was as a all round player who used to run through his overs very fast, was a really good fielder by the then standards of Pakistani cricket and handy with the bat for some quick runs. But purely as a batsman Sehwag is miles ahead of Afridi. GoldenSun 1 Link to comment
dilliboy Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 Afridi had the talent but the mentality really of a 11 year old.. Anyways he was more useful for Pak as a bowler later on Link to comment
youngindia Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 These are extremely poor and stupid comparisons that shows ignorance of technique . This thread shoud be posted in the daily jokes section, It won't take more than a few balls for me to say Pant is a batsman and Afridi is no batsman, Afridi had near zero technique when he first came in, He improved to a sort of basic technique. but he had to rely on eye, ball striking and high risk.He had no real technique to fall back on. “For the last 15 years, Afridi has maintained a particular style. He has no technique. He watches the ball and goes to hit it big,” said Akram while talking to local media in Karachi. No technique is an exaggerration but very weak technique yes., If you compare him to any batsman, i have no reason to care about your opinions on cricket, You have no clue. Link to comment
TNAmarkFromIndia Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 21 minutes ago, youngindia said: These are extremely poor and stupid comparisons that shows ignorance of technique . This thread shoud be posted in the daily jokes section, It won't take more than a few balls for me to say Pant is a batsman and Afridi is no batsman, Afridi had near zero technique when he first came in, He improved to a sort of basic technique. but he had to rely on eye, ball striking and high risk.He had no real technique to fall back on. “For the last 15 years, Afridi has maintained a particular style. He has no technique. He watches the ball and goes to hit it big,” said Akram while talking to local media in Karachi. No technique is an exaggerration but very weak technique yes., If you compare him to any batsman, i have no reason to care about your opinions on cricket, You have no clue. Pant gets out in some stupid way in a bunch of ODIs or T20Is and you will go missing from this thread. Laaloo 1 Link to comment
youngindia Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 5 minutes ago, TNAmarkFromIndia said: Pant gets out in some stupid way in a bunch of ODIs or T20Is and you will go missing from this thread. Get lost you ignorant idiot. I don't care a damn about what you think. Link to comment
TNAmarkFromIndia Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 4 minutes ago, youngindia said: Get lost you ignorant idiot. I don't care a damn about what you think. The butthurt is real. Laaloo 1 Link to comment
youngindia Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 4 minutes ago, TNAmarkFromIndia said: The butthurt is real. Stick to discussions with other equally gifted morons. Put on ignore. For good Link to comment
TNAmarkFromIndia Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 3 minutes ago, youngindia said: Stick to discussions with other equally gifted morons. I am doing that right now. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now