Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Clarke said:

 

Or maybe the expensive as hell watch stopped working :hysterical:


even if it stops working , I can use it as a weapon .. :yess:

super heavy , far more heavier my old watch

Posted
1 hour ago, velu said:

 

Introducing Holy Smokes, It's A Tiffany-Blue Patek Philippe Nautilus – The Final Variation Of The 5711

 

@nevada :dance:

 

 

PP_5711_1A_018copy-1-scaled-e1638823829233.jpg

 

 

PP_5711_1A_018_DET-3468_RVBcopy.jpg?ixli

 

PP_5711_1A_018_PRESS_fond_bleu_RVBcopy.j

 

 

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/holy-smokes-its-a-tiffany-blue-patek-philippe-nautilus-the-final-variation-of-the-5711

When I hear Patek, I can only think of the Calatrava. This model looks so different. And looks like they are following the Rolex. Do you visit timezone.com? They have a sub forum for each major brand. 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Mariyam said:

@velu

 

I'm a misfit in this thread. The most expensive watch that I've bought is a Rs 3600 Titan RaGa. That too only coz of brand loyalty to the Tata Group and the prince of Indian secularism.

 

 

So you don't own the symbol of American capitalism - the Apple watch ?

Posted
2 hours ago, diga said:

 

So you don't own the symbol of American capitalism - the Apple watch ?

Guilty. :(( 

 

How did you guess?

 

Still, *I* haven't spent more than Rs 3600 on a watch. :sherlock:

Posted
6 hours ago, Mariyam said:

Sorry?

 

Bas kuch nahi...aisi hi. 

 

Hard to fathom that someone whose affluence is so conspicuous, so as to be able to spend 3600/day for 365 days till perpetuity on a mere watch would be so frugal on this indulgence.  I am stunned. Kya kuch socha tha maine.  You are guilty of bringing this upon me.

Posted
5 hours ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

Bas kuch nahi...aisi hi. 

 

Hard to fathom that someone whose affluence is so conspicuous, so as to be able to spend 3600/day for 365 days till perpetuity on a mere watch would be so frugal on this indulgence.  I am stunned. Kya kuch socha tha maine.  You are guilty of bringing this upon me.

Arre :(( 

 

All I'm saying is that watches hold no fascination for me. Basically a sunken cost. Hence I've never spent on one. All my fancy ( not @velu level fancy) watches have been gifted to me. :p:

Posted
5 hours ago, nevada said:

Awesome, congratulations on a smart investment! 

 

got really lucky ..

lost patience and asked AD to give me whatever be the color which is available other than silver and black , fortunately got tiffany blue  

Posted

@Clarke

 

Couldn't help but notice, the clocks in both Ghadi and the NCP flag are set at 10:10. That too a wrong 10:10. Shoudn't the hour hand have moved a sixth of the way towards 11? Same mistake twice over? Freakish coincidence? 

Or perhaps the same marketing agency conjured up both the logos?

 

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

@Clarke

 

Couldn't help but notice, the clocks in both Ghadi and the NCP flag are set at 10:10. That too a wrong 10:10. Shoudn't the hour hand have moved a sixth of the way towards 11? Same mistake twice over? Freakish coincidence? 

Or perhaps the same marketing agency conjured up both the logos?

 

 

 

I've noticed this earlier too on watch/clock images, seems its aesthetics.

 

https://petapixel.com/2013/06/27/why-photographs-of-watches-and-clocks-show-the-time-1010/

 

I used to relate it to a person's hands reaching out in a friendly manner.

×
×
  • Create New...