Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

 

No player should be judged after every game.   all players have more bad days than good days. 

Especially in Eden Gardens...  Small boundaries no help in the pitch...  Absolute road. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, maniac said:

Apologies to fast bowling fan club bros but Kuldeep Sen isn’t that good.

That's fine.

He hasn't bowled well so far, criticism is valid.

He should bowl better and plan his deliveries, simply banging the ball against free flowing strikers isn't going to help.

Posted
Just now, singhvivek141 said:

That's fine.

He hasn't bowled well so far, criticism is valid.

He should bowl better and plan his deliveries, simply banging the ball against free flowing strikers isn't going to help.

Not today. I don’t rate bowlers who don’t have plan B and have extremely poor fitness. Bowling 140 clicks only gets someone so many lifelines. Never rated Saini, Aaron for the same reason and always backed Ishant, Shami, Umesh as noticed their skill and additional talent that the others lacked. They might have been mediocre occasionally or had bad days but they are bonafide match winners and context of Indian pace history, Indian ATG’s. Thats the kind I back. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, maniac said:

Not today. I don’t rate bowlers who don’t have plan B and have extremely poor fitness. Bowling 140 clicks only gets someone so many lifelines. Never rated Saini, Aaron for the same reason and always backed Ishant, Shami, Umesh as noticed their skill and additional talent that the others lacked. They might have been mediocre occasionally or had bad days but they are bonafide match winners and context of Indian pace history, Indian ATG’s. Thats the kind I back. 

Understand and respect your opinion.

Hope he improves.

Although today except Boult & Avesh so far every bowler has been beltered, Narine scoring 96* generally means bowling has been poor.

Posted (edited)

I don't understand one thing though, whenever a fast bowler bowls poorly..everyone starts to target his pace on the SM as if high pace is the reason he is erratic.

 

Yesterday trundlers like Bhuvi & Unadkut were smashed, who won't even touch 135 properly...why don't anyone criticise them for their low pace.

 

If low pace is equal to accuracy, shouldn't the latter 2 names be more ridiculed as they are erratic despite bowling slower ? Atleast who bowls fast put some effort, what effort does a trundler puts in his bowling, yet can't control his lines.

Edited by singhvivek141
Posted
32 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

All the more reason a bowler should not provide width ( not talking about his attempted wide yorkers )

Bowled two cracking yorkers at 144k to Ramandeep and Rinku in the end...  Why did he try so many slot balls?  Yes a bowler must use his brains as well at times.  That's what makes Boom special. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Bowled two cracking yorkers at 144k to Ramandeep and Rinku in the end...  Why did he try so many slot balls?  Yes a bowler must use his brains as well at times.  That's what makes Boom special. 

Sen has ability to bowl yorker, seems he is not confident on it though.

 

That's what makes Bumrah & Tyagi apart.

Bumrah's USP is yorkers, and Tyagi too may err in line but his yorkers are most of the time accurate.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mosher said:

Not watching the match but just 9 runs and a wicket by Sen in the last over. 

Decent last over. However 2 length balls, one was a 6 stopped by excellent fielding at the boundary by Parag and then a length ball mistimed by Venky Iyer which probably would have been a 6 if Russell mistimed it.would have ended up with 2 6’s or even 3. Anyway mixed bag over, overall decent so no hate :nice:

×
×
  • Create New...