Jump to content

IPL ... Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners ....


express bowling

Recommended Posts

Hangargekar types have been put on ice by CSK/Dhoni..... this is team for "experienced" players and newbies have to wait.

 

Read this and you get a notion of what is in the mind of CSK/Dhoni.

 

"One of the founding principles of Chennai Super Kings (CSK) in the Indian Premier League (IPL) is its backing of experience over youth in the playing XI."

 

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cricket/ipl/ipl-news/ipl-2024-chennai-super-kings-best-team-youngsters-talent-hangargekar-mukesh-choudhary-less-gametime-ms-dhoni-nets/article68023054.ece

 

Basically they want some good net bowlers......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

It was a high scoring match yesterday and the RR was 14.35 in the first innings.

 

4 pacers gave away even more than this

 

Unadkat   18.5 runs per over

Topley      17.0 rpo

Vyshak     16.0

Bhuvi        15.0

 

But these medium pacers are either sure-shot starters or preferred replacements while Umran amd Akshdeep are dropped after just 1 or 2 expensive overs.

 

Why ????

 

Most of these sure-shot pick medium pacers don't look that skilful or accurate even. 

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

 

No player should be judged after every game.   all players have more bad days than good days. 

Especially in Eden Gardens...  Small boundaries no help in the pitch...  Absolute road. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, maniac said:

Apologies to fast bowling fan club bros but Kuldeep Sen isn’t that good.

That's fine.

He hasn't bowled well so far, criticism is valid.

He should bowl better and plan his deliveries, simply banging the ball against free flowing strikers isn't going to help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, singhvivek141 said:

That's fine.

He hasn't bowled well so far, criticism is valid.

He should bowl better and plan his deliveries, simply banging the ball against free flowing strikers isn't going to help.

Not today. I don’t rate bowlers who don’t have plan B and have extremely poor fitness. Bowling 140 clicks only gets someone so many lifelines. Never rated Saini, Aaron for the same reason and always backed Ishant, Shami, Umesh as noticed their skill and additional talent that the others lacked. They might have been mediocre occasionally or had bad days but they are bonafide match winners and context of Indian pace history, Indian ATG’s. Thats the kind I back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maniac said:

Not today. I don’t rate bowlers who don’t have plan B and have extremely poor fitness. Bowling 140 clicks only gets someone so many lifelines. Never rated Saini, Aaron for the same reason and always backed Ishant, Shami, Umesh as noticed their skill and additional talent that the others lacked. They might have been mediocre occasionally or had bad days but they are bonafide match winners and context of Indian pace history, Indian ATG’s. Thats the kind I back. 

Understand and respect your opinion.

Hope he improves.

Although today except Boult & Avesh so far every bowler has been beltered, Narine scoring 96* generally means bowling has been poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand one thing though, whenever a fast bowler bowls poorly..everyone starts to target his pace on the SM as if high pace is the reason he is erratic.

 

Yesterday trundlers like Bhuvi & Unadkut were smashed, who won't even touch 135 properly...why don't anyone criticise them for their low pace.

 

If low pace is equal to accuracy, shouldn't the latter 2 names be more ridiculed as they are erratic despite bowling slower ? Atleast who bowls fast put some effort, what effort does a trundler puts in his bowling, yet can't control his lines.

Edited by singhvivek141
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

All the more reason a bowler should not provide width ( not talking about his attempted wide yorkers )

Bowled two cracking yorkers at 144k to Ramandeep and Rinku in the end...  Why did he try so many slot balls?  Yes a bowler must use his brains as well at times.  That's what makes Boom special. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Bowled two cracking yorkers at 144k to Ramandeep and Rinku in the end...  Why did he try so many slot balls?  Yes a bowler must use his brains as well at times.  That's what makes Boom special. 

Sen has ability to bowl yorker, seems he is not confident on it though.

 

That's what makes Bumrah & Tyagi apart.

Bumrah's USP is yorkers, and Tyagi too may err in line but his yorkers are most of the time accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mosher said:

Not watching the match but just 9 runs and a wicket by Sen in the last over. 

Decent last over. However 2 length balls, one was a 6 stopped by excellent fielding at the boundary by Parag and then a length ball mistimed by Venky Iyer which probably would have been a 6 if Russell mistimed it.would have ended up with 2 6’s or even 3. Anyway mixed bag over, overall decent so no hate :nice:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...