Lone Wolf Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 16 minutes ago, Jay said: Sachin was more consistent. He had a much longer prime. But peak vs peak kphli is better. Does anyone get me? Kohli had a couple of years peak at max at test level 2016-18. He was just another good batsman in all other time in his career nothing special. Nor he had the quality & range of strokes SRT had. raki05 1
Jay Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 9 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Kohli had a couple of years peak at max at test level 2016-18. He was just another good batsman in all other time in his career nothing special. Nor he had the quality & range of strokes SRT had. At his best he was better but overall Sachin is superior. Peak vs peak kohli imo was the better player. Too bad his peak was short lived. A similar analogy would be peak Shane bond. Peak vs peak, imo he was better than even steyn. However his peak was short lived. His career was riddled with injuries. Lone Wolf 1
Jay Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 Sachin was like Federer. Kohli being say Nadal for instance. Sachin was the maestro. Peak vs peak, Nadal is the better player. However Federer had a longer prime. In saying that Nadal is probably greater than Federer now that he has won 20 slams.
ShoonyaSifar Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 58 minutes ago, VT87 said: Yes Sachin would have scored 300 runs with blind fold and one hand against this pedestrian attack (best in nz history) in damp,overcast condition .could you elaborate me what was the performance of Sachin in our famous SENA victories during 2000-2011 period ,i can count some of his failures .in our famous Adelaide victory he was utter failure , in our famous Perth victory he failed ,in Johannesburg 2006 victory he failed ,tell me his supper cluch performance in any SENA victory where he was highest scorer.I can give you some of Ftb Kohli performance ,Johannesburg victory he was highest scorer,in Trent bridge scored 200 runs in a match,in Melbourne 2018 match he was second highest scorer 82 runs after Pujara . Adelaide 2003 - 1, 37 Joburg 2006- 44, 14 Perth 2008 - 71, 13 Scores similar to 44 are termed as failures for Sachin and indeed he should have contributed more, but for Kohli fans a 44 is an achievement! Nothing more to say BTW, when you get time, do watch 111 at Joburg '93, 122 at Birmingham '96, 113 at Wellington '98 and 116 at MCG in '99.
VT87 Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 20 minutes ago, ShoonyaSifar said: Adelaide 2003 - 1, 37 Joburg 2006- 44, 14 Perth 2008 - 71, 13 Scores similar to 44 are termed as failures for Sachin and indeed he should have contributed more, but for Kohli fans a 44 is an achievement! Nothing more to say BTW, when you get time, do watch 111 at Joburg '93, 122 at Birmingham '96, 113 at Wellington '98 and 116 at MCG in '99. Bhai ,where did I say 44 is an achievement,I just pointing out those who mocked him like if there were Sachin who would have scored 1000 runs in this severe condition against arguably NZ’s best pace attack in their history.he was indeed playing well and very astute about his off stump ,it was his bad luck that match was interrupted again and again and he lost his concentration ,facing 132 balls is a good effort.
vijaydude Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 (edited) 31 minutes ago, Jay said: Sachin was like Federer. Kohli being say Nadal for instance. Sachin was the maestro. Peak vs peak, Nadal is the better player. However Federer had a longer prime. In saying that Nadal is probably greater than Federer now that he has won 20 slams. Peak vs peak, Djokovic trumps them all. With a positive h2h against both Nadal and Federer, the 19-slam-winning Djokovic -- with a career Slam done twice along with at least two of each Masters -- also happens to be by far the most dominant player of the last decade. In fact, he's the most dominant player of all time with the most weeks spent at no.1 than anybody else (including Federer whom he beat recently here). Edited June 22, 2021 by vijaydude
kohli Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 2 hours ago, VT87 said: Yes Sachin would have scored 300 runs with blind fold and one hand against this pedestrian attack (best in nz history) in damp,overcast condition .could you elaborate me what was the performance of Sachin in our famous SENA victories during 2000-2011 period ,i can count some of his failures .in our famous Adelaide victory he was utter failure , in our famous Perth victory he failed ,in Johannesburg 2006 victory he failed ,tell me his supper cluch performance in any SENA victory where he was highest scorer.I can give you some of Ftb Kohli performance ,Johannesburg victory he was highest scorer,in Trent bridge scored 200 runs in a match,in Melbourne 2018 match he was second highest scorer 82 runs after Pujara . Adelaide test- 1, 37 j’burg- 44, 44( only Indian batsman who cross 40 in both innings) leeds2002- 193( highest score for india) Perth- 71, 13 ( 2nd highest score in first innings) hamilton 2009- 160 highest score for india Sa 2011- flop in both innings Its not a bad record.
CG Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 Kohli is a limited batsman who is basically a front foot player. when compared to Sachin Tendulkar who was good on front and backfoot. raki05 and kohli 1 1
VT87 Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 23 minutes ago, kohli said: Adelaide test- 1, 37 j’burg- 44, 44( only Indian batsman who cross 40 in both innings) leeds2002- 193( highest score for india) Perth- 71, 13 ( 2nd highest score in first innings) hamilton 2009- 160 highest score for india Sa 2011- flop in both innings Its not a bad record. Stop pandering lie he scored 14 in second innings in j’burg match check again
R!TTER Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 2 hours ago, Jay said: Peak vs peak kohli imo was the better player. Nope, at his peak SRT played maybe half the number of tests Brat did? And even less at home, do you remember how many tests Kohli played in India 2016 & 2017 raki05 1
Rasgulla Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 36 minutes ago, CG said: Kohli is a limited batsman who is basically a front foot player. when compared to Sachin Tendulkar who was good on front and backfoot. Somehow averages more than him in all formats. Your footwork is over rated lol Players like steve smith ll never become what they are if it's all about that!
Serpico Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 8 minutes ago, Rasgulla said: Somehow averages more than him in all formats. Your footwork is over rated lol he averages less than Sachin in test format kohli 1
kohli Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 44 minutes ago, VT87 said: Stop pandering lie he scored 14 in second innings in j’burg match check again You are right. Its my mistake.
Jay Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 40 minutes ago, R!TTER said: Nope, at his peak SRT played maybe half the number of tests Brat did? And even less at home, do you remember how many tests Kohli played in India 2016 & 2017 kohli plays 3 formats.
R!TTER Posted June 23, 2021 Posted June 23, 2021 20 hours ago, Jay said: kohli plays 3 formats. And? LO avg, mainly ODI, has also balloned by around 10-15 for top batsmen of this era, you think SRT wouldn't avg at least 50 as an opener today T20 is hard to predict just based on avg, but peak SRT>>>>peak Kohli, Sharma, KLR or anyone you can think of raki05 1
New guy Posted June 23, 2021 Posted June 23, 2021 (edited) On 6/22/2021 at 2:38 PM, VT87 said: So Sachin’s last years extended 2000-2012 over a decade. Every criticism thread of sachin Edited June 23, 2021 by New guy Cricspin 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now