express bowling Posted August 17, 2021 Author Posted August 17, 2021 10 hours ago, Nikhil_cric said: 100000% agree with this. 4 quicks all the way. We either play the extra fast bowler or the extra batsman. No room for the extra spinner at all. We are seeing much more intensity from our pacers in the last 2 tests ( played with 4 quicks ) compared to the WTC Final ( played with 3 quicks ). And playing 4 quicks would mean keeping individual pacers fresh in a long series. This is needed if we want actual test series wins in SENA regularly. Mosher 1
CodeOfWisden Posted August 17, 2021 Posted August 17, 2021 Put Jadeja at 5 Ashwin at 7 and 4 pacers. In this way we will never let the opposition score 300 and it won't affect the batting too much as fourth pacer would be Shardul. Lord 1
express bowling Posted August 17, 2021 Author Posted August 17, 2021 7 hours ago, CodeOfWisden said: Put Jadeja at 5 Ashwin at 7 and 4 pacers. In this way we will never let the opposition score 300 and it won't affect the batting too much as fourth pacer would be Shardul. This would mean dropping either Pujara or Rahane. Would Kohli do that ? ( Although Ashwin, the batsman, won't be any worse than these two based on current form ) Lord and Mosher 2
Vijy Posted August 19, 2021 Posted August 19, 2021 On 8/17/2021 at 9:40 AM, express bowling said: This would mean dropping either Pujara or Rahane. Would Kohli do that ? ( Although Ashwin, the batsman, won't be any worse than these two based on current form ) It's Rat who should be dropped, but that's a different matter. He is being outscored by Boom-Boom.
express bowling Posted September 6, 2021 Author Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) Indian fast bowlers win another test match for us away from home. 4 fast bowlers, bowling in tandem, have allowed someone like a Bumrah to bowl at full pace and with fire despite playing his 5th test in a short time. Bumrah's hostile spell made a big difference. I wanted Ashwin in place of Jadeja, in this test though. Want the same in the next test too. Shardul looks like a No.7 batsman and Ashwin can easily replace Jaddu. Edited September 6, 2021 by express bowling Lord and Mosher 2
Lord Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 Just now, express bowling said: Indian fast bowlers win another test match for us away from home. 4 fast bowlers, bowling in tandem, has allowed someone like a Bumrah to bowl at full pace and with fire despite playing his 5th test in a short time. Bumrah's Hostile spell made a big difference. I wanted Ashwin in place of Jadeja, in this test though. Want the same in the next test too. Shardul looks like a No.7 batsman and Ashwin can easily replace Jaddu. yes the no. 7 position originally belonged to Hardik which allowed us to play Ashwin+ other 3 pacers lack of hardik's bowling meant we had to leave Ash and play 4 pacers. But Thakur can take that and nail no. 7 spot and allow us to play Ash. Better balance express bowling 1
express bowling Posted September 6, 2021 Author Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Lord said: yes the no. 7 position originally belonged to Hardik which allowed us to play Ashwin+ other 3 pacers lack of hardik's bowling meant we had to leave Ash and play 4 pacers. But Thakur can take that and nail no. 7 spot and allow us to play Ash. Better balance Yes... Shardul at 7, Ashwin at 8 ... and 3 more proper fast bowlers. This should be our combination now in tests outside Asia. This gives us 4 pacers + Ashwin. Edited September 6, 2021 by express bowling Lord and Mosher 2
vvvslaxman Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 28 minutes ago, express bowling said: Yes... Shardul at 7, Ashwin at 8 ... and 3 more proper fast bowlers. This should be our combination now in tests outside Asia. This gives us 4 pacers + Ashwin. Yes. Jaddu disappointed us. I expected more from his bat. Not his entire fault. Indian tail is so weak he is not going to make any runs with tail. Pushing him up the order didn't help either. Batting average of 22 in 7 innings and bowling average 45 in 7 innings. Hardly any impact in any of the innings.
Lord Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 5 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Yes. Jaddu disappointed us. I expected more from his bat. Not his entire fault. Indian tail is so weak he is not going to make any runs with tail. Pushing him up the order didn't help either. Batting average of 22 in 7 innings and bowling average 45 in 7 innings. Hardly any impact in any of the innings. I thought he was okay today as 5th bowler. 2 wickets,economy. But should be dropped for batting failures.
vvvslaxman Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Lord said: I thought he was okay today as 5th bowler. 2 wickets,economy. But should be dropped for batting failures. His selection was more to do with covering the woeful 3/4/5. He is in decent form. But he is no Ben stokes. If his bowling was not much of use and batting is barely adequate they might as well go in with Vihari a proper batsman who can bowl off spin. It is funny horses for the courses policy is applicable only for bowlers. Not batsmen. Rahane averages 36 in India which is woeful by any stretch of the imagination. He still gets to play home tests. Lord 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 11 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Yes. Jaddu disappointed us. I expected more from his bat. Not his entire fault. Indian tail is so weak he is not going to make any runs with tail. Pushing him up the order didn't help either. Batting average of 22 in 7 innings and bowling average 45 in 7 innings. Hardly any impact in any of the innings. Yup he has disappointed He plays as batting all rounder overseas and thats not good. Lord 1
Lord Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: His selection was more to do with covering the woeful 3/4/5. He is in decent form. But he is no Ben stokes. If his bowling was not much of use and batting is barely adequate they might as well go in with Vihari a proper batsman who can bowl off spin. It is funny horses for the courses policy is applicable only for bowlers. Not batsmen. Rahane averages 36 in India which is woeful by any stretch of the imagination. He still gets to play home tests. Vihari should play for Rahane but previously Jaddu the batsmen had done better than Vihari express bowling 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) If they wanna stick to it start sending more seamers in squad next time and rotation needs to be worked out better for a longish series. U cannot send so many spinners on tour then - ash, jaddu, axar, sundar.............last time it was ash , jaddu n kuldeep Edited September 6, 2021 by Ankit_sharma03 Lord and express bowling 2
Lord Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said: If they wanna stick to it start sending more seamers in squad next time and rotation needs to be worked out better for a longish series. also include Shankar and other seamers who can bat
vvvslaxman Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: If they wanna stick to it start sending more seamers in squad next time and rotation needs to be worked out better for a longish series. Luckily we had a lot of fit players this time around to take the load.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Lord said: also include Shankar and other seamers who can bat Seaming all rounder always for overseas. Shankar to i wud have picked as pure batsman also if he never bowled an over to Lord 1
rkt.india Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: If they wanna stick to it start sending more seamers in squad next time and rotation needs to be worked out better for a longish series. U cannot send so many spinners on tour then - ash, jaddu, axar, sundar.............last time it was ash , jaddu n kuldeep This time more players were sent just because of Covid. Otherwise you don't get such big squad. Also you always try to play your best pacers. No team rotates needlessly in such a big series. Only when someone is injured. Bowlers also want to play as many games. Edited September 6, 2021 by rkt.india
ash Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 Shardul plus Ashwin can surely cover Jadeja's batting. But Kohli won't budge. Jaddu will be the no 1 spinner Lord 1
Lord Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 19 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: If they wanna stick to it start sending more seamers in squad next time and rotation needs to be worked out better for a longish series. U cannot send so many spinners on tour then - ash, jaddu, axar, sundar.............last time it was ash , jaddu n kuldeep Sundar is a batsman express bowling 1
Lord Posted September 6, 2021 Posted September 6, 2021 Just now, ash said: Shardul plus Ashwin can surely cover Jadeja's batting. But Kohli won't budge. Jaddu will be the no 1 spinner Jaddu will cover Rahane's batting instead
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now