Jump to content

Oval Test: Don’t expect India seamers to do much better than England - Michael Holding on Day 5 pitch


G_B_

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, ravishingravi said:


Because taking the knee is mockable and Holding is entitled to his prejudices. 

Another brown indian who thinks he is  white. Raicst indians are the most laughably dumb human beings on the planet, the uncle toms of modern age who think white people think they are one of them

Posted
1 hour ago, New guy said:

Another brown indian who thinks he is  white. Raicst indians are the most laughably dumb human beings on the planet, the uncle toms of modern age who think white people think they are one of them


On the contrary, I think I am very very black. But this guy proves my point that bending the knee is in fact mockable. He is a casual racist who refers to me by colour of my skin but want everyone take him seriously on bending the knee. 

Posted
2 hours ago, ravishingravi said:


On the contrary, I think I am very very black. But this guy proves my point that bending the knee is in fact mockable. He is a casual racist who refers to me by colour of my skin but want everyone take him seriously on bending the knee. 

But thats this persons problem and not bending the knee problem. Thats like a white person saying, i met an india who was thief so its ok to call all indians thief 

Posted

I don't agree that Holding is Uncle Tom as that is a very big accusation. He is entitled to his views as a cricket expert as he is paid to express his opinion. All I want from him is give a rational opinion on Indian fast bowlers as he was a great fast bowler himself. 

Posted
1 hour ago, New guy said:

But thats this persons problem and not bending the knee problem. Thats like a white person saying, i met an india who was thief so its ok to call all indians thief 


Well for me I don’t see white, brown or black persons. I see person. You however see everyone through the prism of their skin. So keep bending that knee and allow rest of us to mock folks like you. Even if you don’t, rest assured, we would. 

Posted
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

I don't agree that Holding is Uncle Tom as that is a very big accusation. He is entitled to his views as a cricket expert as he is paid to express his opinion. All I want from him is give a rational opinion on Indian fast bowlers as he was a great fast bowler himself. 

just a hypocrite, he has it in for these WI t20 mercenaries too like Pollard, Gayle and Russell whom he barely considers cricketers. It was okay for him during his pomp to run away to play WSC though while he now talks like an anachronistic Colonial era purist.

Posted
42 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

just a hypocrite, he has it in for these WI t20 mercenaries too like Pollard, Gayle and Russell whom he barely considers cricketers. It was okay for him during his pomp to run away to play WSC though while he now talks like an anachronistic Colonial era purist.

Spot on.I think that would be more apt description of Holding.

Posted

safe to say he was wrong :phehe: Don't agree with uncle tom accusations. I'm like wtf. he works with sky sports and is catering to an english audeience. there will be some bias towards those who pay him. its simple. let me put it this way. he's no different than boria mujumdar :laugh:

Posted
50 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

just a hypocrite, he has it in for these WI t20 mercenaries too like Pollard, Gayle and Russell whom he barely considers cricketers. It was okay for him during his pomp to run away to play WSC though while he now talks like an anachronistic Colonial era purist.

yeah that's the part that bugs me. he should deal with it. ipl is cricket just like 50 over cricket was in those days. holding is becoming an old fart. among WI commentators, I prefer Bishop to these senile people. He was great to listen to in the 90s not so much now. gavaskar must be booted off too. and he did the bombay lobby thing of supporting hahane when he averages 20 this year :facepalm:

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ravishingravi said:


Well for me I don’t see white, brown or black persons. I see person. You however see everyone through the prism of their skin. So keep bending that knee and allow rest of us to mock folks like you. Even if you don’t, rest assured, we would. 

Ah the classic raicst logic. 

 

Say when someones legs is hurt, you will say, hey all legs matter so why focus on one hurt leg. No one is fooled dude

 

You are not dumb. You know what racism is 

 

You dont see a person. If you saw a person you would acknowledge the problems with raicsm and discrimination and why its a issue which needs to be addressed

 

Or course you will mock people who stand against racism. Racist thrash like you have been doing it since beggining of time 

 

.imagine being such an inhuman piece of shiite, you mock something which is just a protest against discrimination. And this after being brown

 

As i said, you are the modern day uncle tom. Someoen so dumb you are against something which will help your own people. Way way worst than a whte racist. 

 

What i don't understand is why people like you pretend. Why  pretend  you dont care  for color  whehn you always side with people like trump and racist thrash and then mock minorities for standing up?

 

Just acknowledge the racist uncle tom you are. 

 

A racist and a coward as well

Edited by New guy
Posted
37 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

safe to say he was wrong :phehe: Don't agree with uncle tom accusations. I'm like wtf. he works with sky sports and is catering to an english audeience. there will be some bias towards those who pay him. its simple. let me put it this way. he's no different than boria mujumdar :laugh:

Nah he has a history of doing this. The other sly sports commentators are not like that 

Posted
6 hours ago, New guy said:

Another brown indian who thinks he is  white. Raicst indians are the most laughably dumb human beings on the planet, the uncle toms of modern age who think white people think they are one of them

White people aren't the only ones with privilege to be racist. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Real McCoy said:

yeah that's the part that bugs me. he should deal with it. ipl is cricket just like 50 over cricket was in those days. holding is becoming an old fart. among WI commentators, I prefer Bishop to these senile people. He was great to listen to in the 90s not so much now. gavaskar must be booted off too. and he did the bombay lobby thing of supporting hahane when he averages 20 this year :facepalm:

i'm not convinced it is a bombay lobby thing so much as sticking up for the existing order/ backing those who play the way he thinks is right. he pans rohit sharma very often too.

Posted
2 hours ago, Real McCoy said:

yeah that's the part that bugs me. he should deal with it. ipl is cricket just like 50 over cricket was in those days. holding is becoming an old fart. among WI commentators, I prefer Bishop to these senile people. He was great to listen to in the 90s not so much now. gavaskar must be booted off too. and he did the bombay lobby thing of supporting hahane when he averages 20 this year :facepalm:


I think we must also acknowledge that he is a part of that counter culture where it was all about standing up for little guy. In today’s cricketing context, India is the establishment. He thinks that by going after India he is doing right thing. 
 

Let me be honest. He is not totally wrong. 

Posted
2 hours ago, New guy said:

Nah he has a history of doing this. The other sly sports commentators are not like that 

other sky commentators do it subtly. holding is not that subtle

 

Brian Close sways out of the way of a Michael Holding ...

Posted
1 hour ago, ravishingravi said:


I think we must also acknowledge that he is a part of that counter culture where it was all about standing up for little guy. In today’s cricketing context, India is the establishment. He thinks that by going after India he is doing right thing. 
 

Let me be honest. He is not totally wrong. 

He has strong opinions but that doesn't mean he is in the right. He had his tryst with Stanford T20s before it went bust. So why doesn't he bring that topic up. Its always India. He has a Christian upbringing. Maybe he should follow what they say

Matthew 7:3
“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?
Posted
2 hours ago, rollingstoned said:

i'm not convinced it is a bombay lobby thing so much as sticking up for the existing order/ backing those who play the way he thinks is right. he pans rohit sharma very often too.

are you from mumbai :phehe: I hear you on what youre saying but really. He is defending a poor year where rahane avgs 20. He should know India has no lack of batting resources. Did he mention Vihari who gave an arm and a leg for saving a test in SCG

Posted
Just now, Real McCoy said:

are you from mumbai :phehe: I hear you on what youre saying but really. He is defending a poor year where rahane avgs 20. He should know India has no lack of batting resources. Did he mention Vihari who gave an arm and a leg for saving a test in SCG

I actually am Yes. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...