Jump to content

Update- Ishan kishen set to Open with Rohit in 1st ODI against WI , Shahrukh Khan added to the squad


Recommended Posts

Posted
41 minutes ago, prudent_kreeda said:

 even i think that India needs a very good player of spin and who keeps RR up at #3 and also can play shots against Pace. . SKY may fail at times but wherever he plays 40-50 balls , he will leave the team in a much better position . Let VK play at 4 to carry the innings at good RR .

Virat needs to improve his game against spin, there's no place where you can hide in an loi setup, spin to khelna hi hogi. 

He needs to go back to whatever he was doing in his earlier days. 

Posted

A top 4 of Rohit, Kishan, Kohli, Pant is pretty exciting to watch. Then you have SKY and Deepak Chahar as well. Think Sundar will be no.6 in this team. Kulcha and Siraj Prasidh to complete the XI. A little bigger tail but that is what it is.

 

Rohit

Kishan

Kohli

Pant(wkt)

Sundar

SKY

D Chahar

Kuldeep

Siraj

Prasidh

Yuzi

 

This will be the likely XI.

Posted
5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

SRK- really ??? 

yes, really. one of the few power hitters in domestics. would be a more useful addition if he bowled part-time, which he has stopped doing

Posted
4 minutes ago, Vijy said:

yes, really. one of the few power hitters in domestics. would be a more useful addition if he bowled part-time, which he has stopped doing

 

Wont last in international for long , in short overrated. May hit teams like WI or SL but wont last long

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

Wont last in international for long , in short overrated. May hit teams like WI or SL but wont last long

lasting long is no indicator of quality. go take a look at ishant's first 70 tests, or rahane's last 50 tests, just to name two. SRK probably won't play in first XI, he is there as a backup

Posted
1 minute ago, Vijy said:

lasting long is no indicator of quality. go take a look at ishant's first 70 tests, or rahane's last 50 tests, just to name two. SRK probably won't play in first XI, he is there as a backup

u need quality to last long

Ishant n rahane had quality , they lacked consistency 

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

u need quality to last long

Ishant n rahane had quality , they lacked consistency 

no, they had powerful backers (MSD and Kohli, respectively)... and in ishant's case, he played because of lack of alternatives. longevity, class, and consistency are not one and the same.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Vijy said:

no, they had powerful backers (MSD and Kohli, respectively)... and in ishant's case, he played because of lack of alternatives. longevity, class, and consistency are not one and the same.

he was backed coz he had quality and we also lacked options , he didnt get unfit much like other fast bowlers were .Quality was their , which is why his did well also for last 2-3 yrs before his fitness issues came back 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Frustrated said:

Most ICFers got their wish fulfilled, one way or the other.    Kishan replacing Dhawan.  So, covid did it for us. Something which the selectors could not.  

 

Just think about this for a minute.

 

It took a worldwide pandemic that has crippled and destroyed parts of this world, for the BCCI/TM to replace Dhawan for Kishan. :hysterical:

Posted
24 minutes ago, SRT100 said:

 

Just think about this for a minute.

 

It took a worldwide pandemic that has crippled and destroyed parts of this world, for the BCCI/TM to replace Dhawan for Kishan. :hysterical:

and if possible, they would still play him if it were allowed

Posted
54 minutes ago, Vijy said:

and if possible, they would still play him if it were allowed

 

Probably need a nuclear war to break out for India to replace Kohli. :hysterical:

 

This shameless player will say the game is bigger than anything else and insist on playing.

Posted

I have to admit I feel the pressure for Kishan tonight.

 

Hitman will definitely anchor the innings and get his eye in, so dont expect him to accelerate early.

 

I just hope Kishan is selective with his shots when attacking.

Posted
10 hours ago, Vijy said:

yes, really. one of the few power hitters in domestics. would be a more useful addition if he bowled part-time, which he has stopped doing

Hack of the highest order who is good only for IPL and if selectors continue picking these sort of players we are gonna tank again in the Wt20. 

 

There's a big difference in IPL and international cricket, Varun Chakra showed that, Venky Iyer and SRK are next in line. 

 

They simply aren't good enough. They are Pakistani level bad.

Posted
5 hours ago, Adamant said:

Hack of the highest order who is good only for IPL and if selectors continue picking these sort of players we are gonna tank again in the Wt20. 

 

There's a big difference in IPL and international cricket, Varun Chakra showed that, Venky Iyer and SRK are next in line. 

 

They simply aren't good enough. They are Pakistani level bad.

from what I've seen, SRK's batting ability is about the same or higher than Yusuf Pathan, who played some key innings for Ind in both ODIs and T20s. however, it would have been better for SRK to be given chances at A team level, and then graduate to senior team

Posted
9 minutes ago, Vijy said:

from what I've seen, SRK's batting ability is about the same or higher than Yusuf Pathan, who played some key innings for Ind in both ODIs and T20s. however, it would have been better for SRK to be given chances at A team level, and then graduate to senior team

He is not as good as Yusuf Pathan

A player like Yusuf Pathan would be an automatic selection in every loi team in the world these days. 

 

Yusuf Pathan just played in the wrong era. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...