Adamant Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 41 minutes ago, prudent_kreeda said: even i think that India needs a very good player of spin and who keeps RR up at #3 and also can play shots against Pace. . SKY may fail at times but wherever he plays 40-50 balls , he will leave the team in a much better position . Let VK play at 4 to carry the innings at good RR . Virat needs to improve his game against spin, there's no place where you can hide in an loi setup, spin to khelna hi hogi. He needs to go back to whatever he was doing in his earlier days.
Majestic Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 A top 4 of Rohit, Kishan, Kohli, Pant is pretty exciting to watch. Then you have SKY and Deepak Chahar as well. Think Sundar will be no.6 in this team. Kulcha and Siraj Prasidh to complete the XI. A little bigger tail but that is what it is. Rohit Kishan Kohli Pant(wkt) Sundar SKY D Chahar Kuldeep Siraj Prasidh Yuzi This will be the likely XI.
Frustrated Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 Most ICFers got their wish fulfilled, one way or the other. Kishan replacing Dhawan. So, covid did it for us. Something which the selectors could not. SRT100 and Vijy 1 1
I6MTW Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 Kishan should score 100 in 50 balls. Basically guarantees selection for the next 10 matches.
Vijy Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: SRK- really ??? yes, really. one of the few power hitters in domestics. would be a more useful addition if he bowled part-time, which he has stopped doing
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 5, 2022 Author Posted February 5, 2022 4 minutes ago, Vijy said: yes, really. one of the few power hitters in domestics. would be a more useful addition if he bowled part-time, which he has stopped doing Wont last in international for long , in short overrated. May hit teams like WI or SL but wont last long Adamant 1
Vijy Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said: Wont last in international for long , in short overrated. May hit teams like WI or SL but wont last long lasting long is no indicator of quality. go take a look at ishant's first 70 tests, or rahane's last 50 tests, just to name two. SRK probably won't play in first XI, he is there as a backup
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 5, 2022 Author Posted February 5, 2022 1 minute ago, Vijy said: lasting long is no indicator of quality. go take a look at ishant's first 70 tests, or rahane's last 50 tests, just to name two. SRK probably won't play in first XI, he is there as a backup u need quality to last long Ishant n rahane had quality , they lacked consistency
Vijy Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said: u need quality to last long Ishant n rahane had quality , they lacked consistency no, they had powerful backers (MSD and Kohli, respectively)... and in ishant's case, he played because of lack of alternatives. longevity, class, and consistency are not one and the same. SRT100 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 5, 2022 Author Posted February 5, 2022 5 minutes ago, Vijy said: no, they had powerful backers (MSD and Kohli, respectively)... and in ishant's case, he played because of lack of alternatives. longevity, class, and consistency are not one and the same. he was backed coz he had quality and we also lacked options , he didnt get unfit much like other fast bowlers were .Quality was their , which is why his did well also for last 2-3 yrs before his fitness issues came back
SRT100 Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 6 hours ago, Frustrated said: Most ICFers got their wish fulfilled, one way or the other. Kishan replacing Dhawan. So, covid did it for us. Something which the selectors could not. Just think about this for a minute. It took a worldwide pandemic that has crippled and destroyed parts of this world, for the BCCI/TM to replace Dhawan for Kishan. Vijy, Frustrated and rollingstoned 2 1
Vijy Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 24 minutes ago, SRT100 said: Just think about this for a minute. It took a worldwide pandemic that has crippled and destroyed parts of this world, for the BCCI/TM to replace Dhawan for Kishan. and if possible, they would still play him if it were allowed Pollack and SRT100 2
SRT100 Posted February 6, 2022 Posted February 6, 2022 54 minutes ago, Vijy said: and if possible, they would still play him if it were allowed Probably need a nuclear war to break out for India to replace Kohli. This shameless player will say the game is bigger than anything else and insist on playing. Vijy and Frustrated 1 1
SRT100 Posted February 6, 2022 Posted February 6, 2022 I have to admit I feel the pressure for Kishan tonight. Hitman will definitely anchor the innings and get his eye in, so dont expect him to accelerate early. I just hope Kishan is selective with his shots when attacking.
Adamant Posted February 6, 2022 Posted February 6, 2022 10 hours ago, Vijy said: yes, really. one of the few power hitters in domestics. would be a more useful addition if he bowled part-time, which he has stopped doing Hack of the highest order who is good only for IPL and if selectors continue picking these sort of players we are gonna tank again in the Wt20. There's a big difference in IPL and international cricket, Varun Chakra showed that, Venky Iyer and SRK are next in line. They simply aren't good enough. They are Pakistani level bad. ComfortFood and Frustrated 1 1
Pollack Posted February 6, 2022 Posted February 6, 2022 Shahrukh Khan added to the squad Next we should add Salman Khan and Amir khan. ComfortFood 1
Vijy Posted February 6, 2022 Posted February 6, 2022 5 hours ago, Adamant said: Hack of the highest order who is good only for IPL and if selectors continue picking these sort of players we are gonna tank again in the Wt20. There's a big difference in IPL and international cricket, Varun Chakra showed that, Venky Iyer and SRK are next in line. They simply aren't good enough. They are Pakistani level bad. from what I've seen, SRK's batting ability is about the same or higher than Yusuf Pathan, who played some key innings for Ind in both ODIs and T20s. however, it would have been better for SRK to be given chances at A team level, and then graduate to senior team
Adamant Posted February 6, 2022 Posted February 6, 2022 9 minutes ago, Vijy said: from what I've seen, SRK's batting ability is about the same or higher than Yusuf Pathan, who played some key innings for Ind in both ODIs and T20s. however, it would have been better for SRK to be given chances at A team level, and then graduate to senior team He is not as good as Yusuf Pathan A player like Yusuf Pathan would be an automatic selection in every loi team in the world these days. Yusuf Pathan just played in the wrong era. ComfortFood and Lord 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now