BCCI Fires the Selectors… Breaking News!

[bowl_out]

On 11/23/2022 at 4:49 AM, Stan AF said:

Man, I miss Lollu sabha..Basterds used to make fun of everyone, every movie, any scene (senti or otherwise) every actor and pulled no punches.

 

Honestly, I liked it even more after Santhanam left.. Jeeva was awesome as his replacement and way better than Santhanam

[Vilander]

6 hours ago, putrevus said:

Vengsarkar was one of the best selectors. I think if I am not wrong it was him who wanted to make selectors a paid job. Too many useless players are applying for the job. They need to amend , these guys have to be selectors for their states or zones before they can apply.

 

Who is going to finalize the list?

he was a ruthless promoter of Mumbai, very regional and a shill for Mumbai cricket fraternity. So nope. Need pragmatic individual not pea brains that promote identities.

[jf1gp_1]

With no selectors around, i am assuming Rohit and Rahul are making replacement 

[singhvivek141]

5 hours ago, jf1gp_1 said:

With no selectors around, i am assuming Rohit and Rahul are making replacement 

It's a CAC team, Ashok Malhotra, Sulakshana Pandit and Jatin Paranjpe.

[Kothili]

On 11/18/2022 at 9:43 AM, Lone Wolf said:

Selection panel I guess has quotas too or zone base Committee...  Outdated Pathetic system. 

For good reason. Else Vada Pavs and Tandoori chickens will dominate for posterity.

[Kothili]

20 hours ago, Lord said:

  20 hours ago, putrevus said:

Vengsarkar was one of the best selectors. I think if I am not wrong it was him who wanted to make selectors a paid job. Too many useless players are applying for the job. They need to amend , these guys have to be selectors for their states or zones before they can apply.

 

Who is going to finalize the list?

Vengsarkar was a POS.

[Kothili]

On 11/18/2022 at 11:36 AM, nitinbwj said:

Now fire Sharma, KL and Bhuvi from T20 squad. 

Powerful lobby. Red Bull, Mumbai lobby. Don't know who manages boob.

[Kothili]

On 11/18/2022 at 10:46 PM, Sgattick10 said:

Oh he was a news reader? I know he is from Congress, man seem to get along with all Pol parties 

Pimp-in-chief.

[putrevus]

14 hours ago, Vilander said:

he was a ruthless promoter of Mumbai, very regional and a shill for Mumbai cricket fraternity. So nope. Need pragmatic individual not pea brains that promote identities.

Which Mumbai player he promoted. Ishant,Kohli and other youngsters  were given chances during his tenure.

Edited December 3, 2022 by putrevus

[Vilander]

13 hours ago, Kothili said:

Vengsarkar was a POS.

Accurate for him all mumbsikars are golden most regional mindset. 

[Vijy]

On 12/2/2022 at 1:27 PM, Lord said:

it isnt a paid job?

it is paid, but not high IIRC

[Texan]

Selectors pay needs to be completely result oriented with very minimal base pay. The way it is structured right now, selectors don't have much incentive to pick winning teams. Rather they pick "safe" teams by making sure players who have significant clout in BCCI keep getting picked, while nominally dropping some others to just make it a point to show that they are taking some action.

 

Fact is that all 3 of Rohit, Dhawan and Kohli are no longer good enough to play in our first choice LOI team. We need to replace them with players from domestics like Yashasvi Jaiswal, Ruturaj Gaikwad, Padikkal, and others. Rahul needs to be strictly kept outside the top 3. He is completely useless in the top order. We need to play more dynamic cricket and not be stuck in this mindset and these 3-4 players will only keep staying as the core and others will be rotated around them to balance the team.

[Vijy]

8 minutes ago, Texan said:

Selectors pay needs to be completely result oriented with very minimal base pay. The way it is structured right now, selectors don't have much incentive to pick winning teams. Rather they pick "safe" teams by making sure players who have significant clout in BCCI keep getting picked, while nominally dropping some others to just make it a point to show that they are taking some action.

 

Fact is that all 3 of Rohit, Dhawan and Kohli are no longer good enough to play in our first choice LOI team. We need to replace them with players from domestics like Yashasvi Jaiswal, Ruturaj Gaikwad, Padikkal, and others. Rahul needs to be strictly kept outside the top 3. He is completely useless in the top order. We need to play more dynamic cricket and not be stuck in this mindset and these 3-4 players will only keep staying as the core and others will be rotated around them to balance the team.

performance-based pay is a better option, but even there one must use the right metrics for performance. for example, winning percentage should not matter much as Ind often do well in bilaterals and suck in bigger tourneys

[Texan]

13 minutes ago, Vijy said:

performance-based pay is a better option, but even there one must use the right metrics for performance. for example, winning percentage should not matter much as Ind often do well in bilaterals and suck in bigger tourneys

Totally with you there. Performance based pay should be only on the basis of significant wins.

E.g.

If we win a World Cup or World T20, each selector should get 4-5 cr

If we reach the final of a WC / WT20, then each selector should get 40 lakhs

If we win an away Test series in SENA, then each selector should get 2 cr.

If we win Champions Trophy, then each selector should get around 2.5 cr

 

No extra pay for inconsequential ODI / T20 bilateral series. Winning those is needed to be able to qualify for WCs / WT20s

Minimal extra pay for winning Home Test series against SENA (such as 10 lakhs per series win)

No extra pay for winning Home Test series wins against non-SENA teams. If we can't win those, selectors should be fired right away.

Minimal extra pay for other away series wins (such as 20 lakhs per away series win)

 

Edited December 5, 2022 by Texan

[express bowling]

2 hours ago, Vijy said:

it is paid, but not high IIRC

 

It is pretty highly paid in the last few years.

[wanted_desi]

Who is selecting team for Sri Lanka series?