Jump to content

Only 7 players have a 40+ average and 100+ SR in ODI cricket


sage

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, Chakdephatte said:

Jadhav is underappreciated. Despite that innings in World Cup, he was our best lower order batsman last decade.

at his best, he was very good. but his peak didn't last long though.

Posted
3 hours ago, Chakdephatte said:

Jadhav is underappreciated. Despite that innings in World Cup, he was our best lower order batsman last decade.

Should have played in semis over Karthik

Posted
3 hours ago, Chakdephatte said:

Jadhav is underappreciated. Despite that innings in World Cup, he was our best lower order batsman last decade.

1300 runs is not really a worthy sample. He was good for 1-2 years though ('16 & '17) but that's not enough.

Posted
23 hours ago, Majestic said:

When I look at those numbers with high sample size, gotta appreciate one man here.

 

AB :hatsoff:

Josh B has played a fair no. of matches now. SR of nearly 120 is unreal. some of our "gun" T20 batters have SRs close to this

Posted
51 minutes ago, Vijy said:

Josh B has played a fair no. of matches now. SR of nearly 120 is unreal. some of our "gun" T20 batters have SRs close to this

Yeah Jos as well. Perfect no.6.

Posted
10 hours ago, Lord said:

meanwhile Thala had SR of 87 and is regarded greatest phinisher :hail:

in his later stages, he was the greatest at finishing our hopes, and also the greatest at wrapping up the matches for the opposition.

Posted
On 3/4/2023 at 11:09 AM, Lord said:

meanwhile Thala had SR of 87 and is regarded greatest phinisher :hail:

 

To be fair, he had a SR above 100 after his first 50 games, but then he "matured" and became more "solid" and decided that he needs to "consolidate" the innings and "stay till the end" as that was part of the divine "process".

Posted
On 3/3/2023 at 10:38 PM, rollingstoned said:

It does show runs have become cheap in ODI cricket these days. All are from the last 10 years.

 

That would be case with ODIs in every 5 years span. 1980s cricketers would have felt that runs have become cheap in 90s and so on.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

That would be case with ODIs in every 5 years span. 1980s cricketers would have felt that runs have become cheap in 90s and so on.

It wouldn't be untrue. 

Though i personally feel for quite a long time the odi game didn't really change that much. For like 15-20 years or so, a score of 250 while batting first was considered daunting until mid to late 2000s. Then 2 new balls has also made run scoring easier and taken spinners out of the game for much of the innings. The ball got softer after the 15 overs fielding restriction which made run scoring at a high rate difficult in that period.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...