Chaos Posted January 24, 2025 Posted January 24, 2025 Wait what? Whats happening? I thought for a sec @Vicks57 was tamil hero Vicks57 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted January 24, 2025 Posted January 24, 2025 2 hours ago, coffee_rules said: some numerology BS by the likes Prem Jyotish ! that they believe will bring good luck. He also changed his last name from Devgan to Devgn Very Possible. Also, I wonder if, by changing the name like that, they could just say it is fiction inspired by Taanaaji; so they can take some artistic liberties. coffee_rules 1
coffee_rules Posted January 24, 2025 Author Posted January 24, 2025 2 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Very Possible. Also, I wonder if, by changing the name like that, they could just say it is fiction inspired by Taanaaji; so they can take some artistic liberties. Checked the Hindi poster .. dayum it is : Look at how it is spelt in Marathi I am thinking now , it is to avoid some copyright issues. Like RGV ki (pichwade ki) Aag!!
wanted_desi Posted January 25, 2025 Posted January 25, 2025 Skip all these historical movies - too much masala in these always. rish 1
rish Posted January 25, 2025 Posted January 25, 2025 Seems sub-par and the typical masala film lacking the authenticity I hope some day there is a period movie that capture the actual dialect .Just makes it seem so much more authentic. Glad they kept the original book name.
rish Posted January 25, 2025 Posted January 25, 2025 On 1/23/2025 at 11:06 PM, Lone Wolf said: Love Akshaye Khanna he looks like has done justice at least looks wise. I am curious to see whether they will show Sambhaji's death fully or will try to dilute it by a mere simple execution. They cant show his death.It will cause riots.
coffee_rules Posted February 14, 2025 Author Posted February 14, 2025 (edited) After all, Bollywood played a secular Sambaji. They will never learn. If they show the real communal conflict, it will hurt samuday vishesh. Reviews are mixed. I will still watch it tomorrow in theaters. History should be remembered . Post you review , if anybody has watched. @kepler37b @rish or any Marathis here Edited February 14, 2025 by coffee_rules
diga Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 Deccan herald is back to its mischievous ways... Has a half page article on caste in Indian cinema and in the reviews section, a newbie film critic rates this 1.5 star (/5) saying that the film lacks nuance. Do you depict reality or monkey balance ? Far from the days of Netkallapa Guru swamy and his ideals
singhvivek141 Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 (edited) Looking at the reviews Bullywood as usual tried to "secularize". Ajay Devgn's narration said India was a land where all religions live peacefully. I don't think the concept of "religion" was even there before invasions. All the Buddhism, Jainism, Shaivaites, Vaishnavites etc were just different branches of Sanatan Dharma. Atrocities committed by Aurangzeb is regarded as his greed to expand his empire in Deccan. He was deemed as power hungry monster carefully diluting his real motive behind the death of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. Edited February 15, 2025 by singhvivek141
Gollum Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 (edited) . Edited February 15, 2025 by Gollum coffee_rules 1
coffee_rules Posted February 15, 2025 Author Posted February 15, 2025 45 minutes ago, Gollum said: Madri (mother of Nakul and Sahdeva) committed sati when Pandu died. Don't tell me Mahabharat was written after invasions. Then there is the disgusting caste system which dehumanizes our own. All religions were illogical, dumb, evil but reforms happened over the years. No need to blame others for everything, otherwise no progress will be seen. How is this connected with this movie?
Gollum Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 (edited) 9 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: How is this connected with this movie? Sorry, wrong thread. Saw some people talking about sati/jauhar in the movies mega thread. Edited February 15, 2025 by Gollum coffee_rules 1
coffee_rules Posted February 15, 2025 Author Posted February 15, 2025 4 hours ago, diga said: Deccan herald is back to its mischievous ways... Has a half page article on caste in Indian cinema and in the reviews section, a newbie film critic rates this 1.5 star (/5) saying that the film lacks nuance. Do you depict reality or monkey balance ? Far from the days of Netkallapa Guru swamy and his ideals I want an acknowledgment of Hindavi swaraj and the brutality of his death. Can’t help with secular flavor, comes with Bollywood and India
Gollum Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 What's the verdict guys? Please post reviews, those who have watched. Am a Vicky Kaushal fan, but no faith in the director Laxman Utekar.
Lone Wolf Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 1 hour ago, Gollum said: What's the verdict guys? Please post reviews, those who have watched. Am a Vicky Kaushal fan, but no faith in the director Laxman Utekar. Mixed reviews so far. Solid opening at BO level though. I am hearing that Sambhaji is mostly shown in only action and war cry scenes. No indepth character has been explained. Gollum 1
vayuu1 Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 1 hour ago, Gollum said: Sorry, wrong thread. Saw some people talking about sati/jauhar in the movies mega thread. Madri committed suicide out of guilt not necessity,why didn't kunti comitted sati ,why is that before Raja Ram mohan roy cases of sati was far less and few and suddenly it begins popping up ,why is that the moment mrityunjay vidyalankar writes bedant chandrika in rebuttal of Raja Ram mohan roy and suddenly few days later his body is found in mysterious circumstances,why is that pandit naval Kishore opens a printing press after 1857 kranti and he before printing islamic literature makes it necessary for his employees to perform wazu,so there are lot of things we don't know,main kuch bolunga to vivad ho jayega coffee_rules and AuxiliA 2
Teengunalagaan Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 We are living in such distorted times, they can't even remain true to history. It was Hindavi Swarajya and not Swarajya. How does stating history as it is, bad? What are they afraid of ?
Teengunalagaan Posted February 15, 2025 Posted February 15, 2025 16 hours ago, coffee_rules said: I want an acknowledgment of Hindavi swaraj and the brutality of his death. Can’t help with secular flavor, comes with Bollywood and India Saw the movie today, and it's unapologetic. Some people will be seething after watching this movie. randomGuy 1
Lone Wolf Posted February 16, 2025 Posted February 16, 2025 (edited) Watched Badass Ravikumar instead today... Slasher comedy lmao. They have twisted Aurangzeb's motives to torture Sambhaji I heard from reviews. Big turn off for me right there decided to skip at least for time being. Edited February 16, 2025 by Lone Wolf
coffee_rules Posted February 16, 2025 Author Posted February 16, 2025 15 hours ago, Teengunalagaan said: Saw the movie today, and it's unapologetic. Some people will be seething after watching this movie. Watching it today.
Recommended Posts