Jump to content

Gambhir pushing for Yashaswi's inclusion in XI. Good or Bad ??


Number

Gambhir pushing for Yashaswi's inclusion in XI  

23 members have voted

  1. 1. Is it a good move ?

    • Yes, it is a good move.
      22
    • No, it is not.
      1


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, New guy said:

You guys are over rating Iyer way too much, he is a very limited, average batsman.

 

It's like when Indians used to over rate trundlers because they had few economical spells and ignore real fast bowlers. Iyer is the batting equivalent of that. 

No. He was THE next best thing not too long ago. A spin basher and a  very good hitter. He has worked on his nemesis,the short balls. He should be a regular in ODI's.  Miles ahead of chokli,KL and Sharma atm.

Posted
4 hours ago, New guy said:

You guys are over rating Iyer way too much, he is a very limited, average batsman.

 

It's like when Indians used to over rate trundlers because they had few economical spells and ignore real fast bowlers. Iyer is the batting equivalent of that. 

Is iyer competing with/should be competing Jaiswal for a place in the team tho? You don't need a xi of world beaters. He has little competition in that middle order if it is not for the likes of KL and Kohli or a Rinku who has not had many chances in odis yet. Not the worst option in that case. 

Posted
7 hours ago, nitinbwj said:

No. He was THE next best thing not too long ago. A spin basher and a  very good hitter. He has worked on his nemesis,the short balls. He should be a regular in ODI's.  Miles ahead of chokli,KL and Sharma atm.

if he was better batter against  short ball, he would have been the captain in either t20is or odis.

Inability to play short ball meant he will not be able to retain his place in t20is and will aways be suspect/uncertain fr sena tours.

 

kolhi, shikhar all worked and fixed issue with short ball, nt sure why is he not interested.

 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, nitinbwj said:

Not at the expense of Iyer. 

Yes, Rohit, gill and kolhi are undroppable because 1st 2 are captain and vice captain and then kolhi is kolhi. Who else get drops ??? Iyer

 

 

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, New guy said:

You guys are over rating Iyer way too much, he is a very limited, average batsman.

 

It's like when Indians used to over rate trundlers because they had few economical spells and ignore real fast bowlers. Iyer is the batting equivalent of that. 

Agree, Iyer isn't that good. But despite his limitations, he has already won us important games and series in the last 3-4 years ('21 NZ home series, Mirpur test, WC, especially the SF against NZ), something Gill and Kela haven't been able to do, am not even going to talk about recent returns of oldies. 

 

I hate trundler culture but even there over the years, we have had some clutch skilful trundlers like Irfan Pathan and Venkatesh Prasad, heck even Zaheer Khan post 2007 trundled his way to some memorable spells. Munaf Patel was underrated in our 2011 WC campaign. Think of Iyer like that. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted

Seems Rohit snapped at a reporter in yesterday's PC when questioned about his lack of runs. Pretty sure that brave journalist will now be blacklisted by BCCI. This is how things are done in India (not just BCCI, look at political scene). Absolute lack of accountability. Media is a caged parrot. 

Posted

Jaiswal debuted atleast 1.5 year late. Don't overrate  Iyer on an innings chasing paltry 250. Ugly batter to watch, He isnt indispensable. Jaiswal is future. 23 year old Lefty opener who has already proved his metal in other 2 formats. Iyer is 30 year old overconfident prick who failed when it mattered, cant play short balls, don't play other 2 formats. He will be replaced soon by young batter irrespective of Kohli-Rohit plays/retires. Kohli obviously can't be dropped in ICC tournament when he is MOS of last ICC tournament. If Jaiswal performs and Gill keeps scoring at 3 will definitely put pressure on Fatty sharma. Kohli isn't going anywhere from this format. 

Posted

Iyer had a andhi chukki innings in the CWC SFs,I would definitely take those andhi chukkis in KOs with both hands

I don't like him one bit,he has massive massive weakness can be taken out at will by opposition ,more so now in high pressure games

Posted
23 hours ago, New guy said:

You guys are over rating Iyer way too much, he is a very limited, average batsman.

 

It's like when Indians used to over rate trundlers because they had few economical spells and ignore real fast bowlers. Iyer is the batting equivalent of that. 

I get a very Ambati Rayudu kind of vibe whenever I see Iyer. :laugh:

Posted
On 2/7/2025 at 4:59 PM, nitinbwj said:

Iyer has the capability to win us the CT alone !  Also,there is no sly dog this time.

What ??? Chummins the sly dog is not playing CT..

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, raki05 said:

What ??? Chummins the sly dog is not playing CT..

Welcoming new member to the family,mano ya na mano CT is all low stake,kyu khelne aayega sab kuch chor ke wo bh pakistan CT ke liye

Test series hoti toh bh aata

Edited by Suhaan
Posted
1 minute ago, Suhaan said:

Welcoming new member to the family,mano ya na mano CT is all low stake,kyu khelne aayega sab kuch chor ke wo bh pakistan CT ke liye

He doesn't want to be like Hector of Sparta who left his wife and new born and went to Fight barbarian womaniser Achilees. Cummins know what’s waiting there in Pakistan.

Posted
On 2/8/2025 at 12:17 PM, Gollum said:

Agree, Iyer isn't that good. But despite his limitations, he has already won us important games and series in the last 3-4 years ('21 NZ home series, Mirpur test, WC, especially the SF against NZ), something Gill and Kela haven't been able to do, am not even going to talk about recent returns of oldies. 

 

I hate trundler culture but even there over the years, we have had some clutch skilful trundlers like Irfan Pathan and Venkatesh Prasad, heck even Zaheer Khan post 2007 trundled his way to some memorable spells. Munaf Patel was underrated in our 2011 WC campaign. Think of Iyer like that. 

The issue is, it's not between iyer and oldies or even him and gill, Rahul. 

 

It's always between iyer and youngsters like jaiswal and abhishek, as you can see, jaiswal was dropped after one game.

Posted

For all the criticism Iyer is getting in here he is not half as bad. The biggest weakness Iyer had was facing the short pitched bowling but he seems to have worked on it. England tried to bounce him out and Iyer played some good pull/hook shots this series. These may be flat wickets but England bowlers are pacy. Also Iyer mostly scores fast, infact of all Indian players who have at least scored 2000 ODI runs he has the second highest SR. Sehwag is at the top with 104 and Iyer is second at 102, Gill comes in 3rd with a SR of 101 as well. So there is no reason to push him out of the ODI team just because we don't like him. There were players like Steve Waugh who looked ugly at the crease but did the job for the team, that's what matters.

 

FYI I am not comparing Steve Waugh the player with Shreyas iyer, want to clear that up before people crucify me on the forum.

Posted

So now tell me this, Gambhir was able to get his KKR mates in the squad, but somehow missed Jaiswal. This is despite us already having 4 spinners? 

I am quite sure this team has been selected by Mr Gambhir, no doubt about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...