400 hindus forced to flee from Murshidabad WB

[raki05]

18 hours ago, straighttalk said:

So Hindu girl marrying Muslim is love jihad. Lol..so according to you ...Savarkar followers will dictate the Hindu women on who they can marry or not. Is it a free country or not. They have a mind and choice of their own. If the Muslim guy forced her to marry..then it's a criminal case .let the Government act on it. It is not a program happening at scale as you allude to... Also grooming doesn't have a religious angle..it happens between same religion too . All religions have perverts. It fits the Radical narrative to paint it as love jihad. How many cases..is the girls family a mere bystander...so if they fall in love...the first thing that comes in mind is its jihad. Lol.

Than why your islamist friend tore muslim girl burkha after seeing she  was on a bike with hindu boy and why they openly threat muslim girls when they find them with hindu boys. Whole world is in chaos because of your’s victim mentality when most of you are not victims but criminals.

Edited April 19, 2025 by raki05

[raki05]

18 hours ago, straighttalk said:

2. I have never seen a butcher shop open in last 30 years in any Hindu dominant areas. Hell even Muslims can't rent in Hindu areas easily. Muslims are really poor in India ostensibly due to their lack of education but also systemic discrimination too.

My neighbours are muslims and there are many places where muslims are not just living but having property among hindus and living peacefully. We have many muslims buthershops in every area in Banglore Hyderabad and i can share evidence with pictures but as said hypocrite like you still make these generic baseless and shameless claims. Can you provide data for all your above baseless claims or from next time dont open your filthy mouth and ask data from others.

Edited April 19, 2025 by raki05

[raki05]

On 4/17/2025 at 8:46 PM, straighttalk said:

He is a brainless guy..leave him to it....probably the one who will be ordered to take the talwar and launch attacks on Muslim families who have nothing to do with a crime committed by another Muslim counterpart of his on an innocent Hindu family 

Idiot  probably you are the maulana who incite muslim kids for stone pelting and form grooming * for conversion live in some prestigious posh society among hindus but inciting those poor guys to do violence against hindus . May be if i found you out not then talwar because that is reserved weapon for peacful will give you belt treatment.

Edited April 19, 2025 by raki05

[Gollum]

Next exodus in Seelampur, like Kairana. Some 6 murders of Hindus and Jains (including minors) by Muslim gangs in that area recently. Locals pleading for Yogi's help. 

 

 

[Gollum]

@raki05 don't waste time on gone case libbus and padosi trolls. Just put them on ignore. All they do is lie and run away when caught. 

 

 

Edited April 19, 2025 by Gollum

[Muloghonto]

18 hours ago, straighttalk said:

1. What do you mean? Gujarat riots wasg started with collusion of the Government. There are records of speeches..so don't come with the pretext it's all lies. We know it was not proven in court as evidence is hard to collect when you are in power. Lest you say that it was in response to the train fire...it was not proven then and riots started next day. Even now whether it was arson or accident is debatable. If I accept for arguments sake that the riots were a result of Muslim arson..then the opposite holds true for the 1992 Ayodhya riots when the mosque was destroyed byHindu modern day barbarians. You or some one asked not all religions are same ..ia gree we kill people for eating beef..they kill people for blasphemy and witchcraft. I do give you that the Hinduism espoused by Vivekananda and others do not support violence but the Hinduism practiced by Savarkar followers is the radical side of it.

 

2. I have never seen a butcher shop open in last 30 years in any Hindu dominant areas. Hell even Muslims can't rent in Hindu areas easily. Muslims are really poor in India ostensibly due to their lack of education but also systemic discrimination too.

 

3. So Hindu girl marrying Muslim is love jihad. Lol..so according to you ...Savarkar followers will dictate the Hindu women on who they can marry or not. Is it a free country or not. They have a mind and choice of their own. If the Muslim guy forced her to marry..then it's a criminal case .let the Government act on it. It is not a program happening at scale as you allude to... Also grooming doesn't have a religious angle..it happens between same religion too . All religions have perverts. It fits the Radical narrative to paint it as love jihad. How many cases..is the girls family a mere bystander...so if they fall in love...the first thing that comes in mind is its jihad. Lol.

 

 

4.waqf..i didn't say Muslim can sell land to temple..I meant some congress party come to power and says you Mishraji cannot sell land to your Ram lala ka temple trust. Or donate gold because technically Mishra can buy all the gold in India and give it to the temple trust and then what will happen to rest of the Hindus in the country. Only a Muslim can donate land to Waqf. So technically Waqf can steal land from a Muslim. Thridly , if some bad party is forcefully illegally snatching land..then it's a legal case. If you don't have documentation you lose even if you are the victim. So just because tis Waqf..you bring a religion angle to it..same has been happening with properties since aeons. And your assertion there is no legal recourse..is false

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly84vggk4ro

 

There are disputes going on. 

 

5. So I assume you are equating love jihad to the UK grooming gang. But you yourself admit there is no data. Are the girls minor? Do they have a mind of their own or not? And with a hostile govt in power in many states ..what is preventing them from creating awareness. Whya re they not encouraging the families to file cases. I am really lost..how is it different from UP brahmins killing lower caste Hindus for marrying their women or vice versa ..you just want to paint any inter religion marriage as love jihad with no factual basis. I would say the govt should focus on stopping this than passing waqf bill. If it was Trinamool or Congress..I would even buy the argument that the govt is shielding the Gangs...what excuse do you really have. 

 

hello i asked for evidence of hindus waging war in name of religion like muslims do, aka jihad and examples where hindus have mass murdered their own sects like muslims do. until you can show such savagery amongst hindus, there is no reason to assume hindus have done just as bad thing as muslims have.

 

[mishra]

21 hours ago, straighttalk said:

1. What do you mean? Gujarat riots wasg started with collusion of the Government. There are records of speeches..so don't come with the pretext it's all lies. We know it was not proven in court as evidence is hard to collect when you are in power. Lest you say that it was in response to the train fire...it was not proven then and riots started next day. Even now whether it was arson or accident is debatable. If I accept for arguments sake that the riots were a result of Muslim arson..then the opposite holds true for the 1992 Ayodhya riots when the mosque was destroyed byHindu modern day barbarians. You or some one asked not all religions are same ..ia gree we kill people for eating beef..they kill people for blasphemy and witchcraft. I do give you that the Hinduism espoused by Vivekananda and others do not support violence but the Hinduism practiced by Savarkar followers is the radical side of it.

 

2. I have never seen a butcher shop open in last 30 years in any Hindu dominant areas. Hell even Muslims can't rent in Hindu areas easily. Muslims are really poor in India ostensibly due to their lack of education but also systemic discrimination too.

 

3. So Hindu girl marrying Muslim is love jihad. Lol..so according to you ...Savarkar followers will dictate the Hindu women on who they can marry or not. Is it a free country or not. They have a mind and choice of their own. If the Muslim guy forced her to marry..then it's a criminal case .let the Government act on it. It is not a program happening at scale as you allude to... Also grooming doesn't have a religious angle..it happens between same religion too . All religions have perverts. It fits the Radical narrative to paint it as love jihad. How many cases..is the girls family a mere bystander...so if they fall in love...the first thing that comes in mind is its jihad. Lol.

 

 

4.waqf..i didn't say Muslim can sell land to temple..I meant some congress party come to power and says you Mishraji cannot sell land to your Ram lala ka temple trust. Or donate gold because technically Mishra can buy all the gold in India and give it to the temple trust and then what will happen to rest of the Hindus in the country. Only a Muslim can donate land to Waqf. So technically Waqf can steal land from a Muslim. Thridly , if some bad party is forcefully illegally snatching land..then it's a legal case. If you don't have documentation you lose even if you are the victim. So just because tis Waqf..you bring a religion angle to it..same has been happening with properties since aeons. And your assertion there is no legal recourse..is false

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly84vggk4ro

 

There are disputes going on. 

 

5. So I assume you are equating love jihad to the UK grooming gang. But you yourself admit there is no data. Are the girls minor? Do they have a mind of their own or not? And with a hostile govt in power in many states ..what is preventing them from creating awareness. Whya re they not encouraging the families to file cases. I am really lost..how is it different from UP brahmins killing lower caste Hindus for marrying their women or vice versa ..you just want to paint any inter religion marriage as love jihad with no factual basis. I would say the govt should focus on stopping this than passing waqf bill. If it was Trinamool or Congress..I would even buy the argument that the govt is shielding the Gangs...what excuse do you really have. 

1. Gujrat riots case has been investigated, dealt in court. If you are so smart and had something to add to, Congress would have paid u millions. Fact is, you are either ignorant or wilfully playing dumb.

 

2. Only in UP, under Yogi such shops were closed and verification of butcher permits started happening. Still its only enforced in some states only. Since you are making this claim, i doubt if you have seen India.

 

3. In 1947, Muslims definitely got jinnahs Pakistan, Savarkar followers definitely got India. So why are you expecting Savarkars followers to change. Deal is. Savarkar wanted Historical wrongs corrected. Every major mosque is generally on a foundation of demolished Hindu temple. Every Muslim in India has a Hindu grand parents. Both wrongs must be corrected.

4. Since Waqf board are Only benefiting Muslims and clearly discriminate Hindus or evey non Muslims , So, Either they start serving everyone without being communal or should be banned. 

5. Honour killings happen in Pakistan too among Muslims. Honour killings in India generally don’t involve Brahmins. Most of times it kshatriya caste and non Kshtriya caste. You are peddling agenda.
 

Love Jihad was real and definitely got checked. Grooming gangs are real too. No one saw those poor girls and women as victims till a enquiry was done because Tommy faught for it and took Britain to a level where whites were close to rioting against Islamic followers.

Edited April 19, 2025 by mishra

[rangeelaraja]

21 hours ago, straighttalk said:

1. What do you mean? Gujarat riots was started with collusion of the Government. . 

 

Stopped reading your BS after this. What was the Godhra train incident about ?
 

Have you read the Nanavati- Mehta commission’s assessment of the incident ? 
Answer in plain yes or no. 

[mishra]

11 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

Stopped reading your BS after this. What was the Godhra train incident about ?
 

Have you read the Nanavati- Mehta commission’s assessment of the incident ? 
Answer in plain yes or no. 

Bhai would have been billionaire if Rahul Baba had his number and utilsed his brain and evidence to frame Modi.
 

However, He seems someone from Padosiland as every thing he mentioned is so superficial that it made me think if guy has ever seen India

Edited April 19, 2025 by mishra

[kepler37b]

22 hours ago, straighttalk said:

1. What do you mean? Gujarat riots wasg started with collusion of the Government. There are records of speeches..so don't come with the pretext it's all lies. We know it was not proven in court as evidence is hard to collect when you are in power. Lest you say that it was in response to the train fire...it was not proven then and riots started next day. Even now whether it was arson or accident is debatable. If I accept for arguments sake that the riots were a result of Muslim arson..then the opposite holds true for the 1992 Ayodhya riots when the mosque was destroyed byHindu modern day barbarians. You or some one asked not all religions are same ..ia gree we kill people for eating beef..they kill people for blasphemy and witchcraft. I do give you that the Hinduism espoused by Vivekananda and others do not support violence but the Hinduism practiced by Savarkar followers is the radical side of it.

 

2. I have never seen a butcher shop open in last 30 years in any Hindu dominant areas. Hell even Muslims can't rent in Hindu areas easily. Muslims are really poor in India ostensibly due to their lack of education but also systemic discrimination too.

 

3. So Hindu girl marrying Muslim is love jihad. Lol..so according to you ...Savarkar followers will dictate the Hindu women on who they can marry or not. Is it a free country or not. They have a mind and choice of their own. If the Muslim guy forced her to marry..then it's a criminal case .let the Government act on it. It is not a program happening at scale as you allude to... Also grooming doesn't have a religious angle..it happens between same religion too . All religions have perverts. It fits the Radical narrative to paint it as love jihad. How many cases..is the girls family a mere bystander...so if they fall in love...the first thing that comes in mind is its jihad. Lol.

 

 

4.waqf..i didn't say Muslim can sell land to temple..I meant some congress party come to power and says you Mishraji cannot sell land to your Ram lala ka temple trust. Or donate gold because technically Mishra can buy all the gold in India and give it to the temple trust and then what will happen to rest of the Hindus in the country. Only a Muslim can donate land to Waqf. So technically Waqf can steal land from a Muslim. Thridly , if some bad party is forcefully illegally snatching land..then it's a legal case. If you don't have documentation you lose even if you are the victim. So just because tis Waqf..you bring a religion angle to it..same has been happening with properties since aeons. And your assertion there is no legal recourse..is false

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly84vggk4ro

 

There are disputes going on. 

 

5. So I assume you are equating love jihad to the UK grooming gang. But you yourself admit there is no data. Are the girls minor? Do they have a mind of their own or not? And with a hostile govt in power in many states ..what is preventing them from creating awareness. Whya re they not encouraging the families to file cases. I am really lost..how is it different from UP brahmins killing lower caste Hindus for marrying their women or vice versa ..you just want to paint any inter religion marriage as love jihad with no factual basis. I would say the govt should focus on stopping this than passing waqf bill. If it was Trinamool or Congress..I would even buy the argument that the govt is shielding the Gangs...what excuse do you really have. 

Libbies try hard to fit the deep and complex reality to their lazy premise of "All izz equalzzz.". 

 

No, it is not possible.

 

There are cultures that are productive, peaceful and prosperous. And there are those that are violent, intolerant, poor and dumb. The latter will always be backward and deserve the disgust from civilized world.  

[straighttalk]

23 hours ago, raki05 said:

Than why your islamist friend tore muslim girl burkha after seeing she  was on a bike with hindu boy and why they openly threat muslim girls when they find them with hindu boys. Whole world is in chaos because of your’s victim mentality when most of you are not victims but criminals.

The term Most of you - is why I call you a * radical.and people of your ilk will tarnish the good name of Hinduism and make it persona non grata like Islam...you talk about tolerance in ancient Hinduism..yet you are full of hatred...punish the guys who committed crimes...but punish both Hindus assholes and Muslim assholes...don't call for killing innocent people. And that applies for the Muslims torching houses too. I give rats ass about religion and what irks me is how simple minded people jump on this bandwagon of hatred ..all the while the country is going to the dogs and enriching the oligarchs now or the politicians themselves earlier.

[straighttalk]

11 hours ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

Stopped reading your BS after this. What was the Godhra train incident about ?
 

Have you read the Nanavati- Mehta commission’s assessment of the incident ? 
Answer in plain yes or no. 

Yes and I know you haven't read it as otherwise you wouldn't have brought it up. I will quote Wikipedia and before you say it's a leftist media..you can check the sources and provide facts that refute it. Else accept that you haven't read the report or the multiple fallacies in it or it just suits you to believe whatever you fancy 

 

 

After six years of going over the details, Nanavati-Mehta Commission submitted its preliminary report which concluded that the fire was an act of arson, committed by a mob of one to two thousand locals.[42][51] Maulvi Husain Haji Ibrahim Umarji, a cleric in Godhra, and a dismissed Central Reserve Police Force officer named Nanumiyan were presented as the "masterminds" behind the arson.[52] After 24 extensions, the commission submitted its final report on 18 November 2014.[53] The findings of the commission were called into question by a video recording released by Tehelka magazine, which showed Arvind Pandya, counsel for the Gujarat government, stating that the findings of the Shah-Nanavati commission would support the view presented by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), as Shah was "their man" and Nanavati could be bribed.[54]

 

In February 2011, the trial court convicted 31 people and acquitted 63 others based on the murder and conspiracy provisions of the Indian Penal Code, saying the incident was a "pre-planned conspiracy."[55] [56] Of those convicted, 11 were sentenced to death and the other 20 to life in prison.[57][58] Maulvi Umarji, presented by the Nanavati-Shah commission as the prime conspirator, was acquitted along with 62 others accused for lack of evidence.[59][60]

 

The primary accused was acquitted due to lack of evidence.

 

But prior to that ..have you seen how typical Bollywood style..the govt tried to subvert justice. Wonder why if they have nothing to hide.

 

The government of Gujarat set up Gujarat High Court judge K. G. Shah as a one-man commission to look into the incident,[41] but following outrage among families of victims and in the media over Shah's alleged closeness to Modi, retired Supreme Court judge G.T. Nanavati was added as chairman of the now two-person commission.[42]

 

 

And while we are on the topic of commission..did you see multiple other comission reports or did you just ignore them because they don't shut your narrative.

 

In 2003, The Concerned Citizens Tribunal (CCT)[Note 1] concluded that the fire had been an accident.[43][44][45] Several other independent commentators have also concluded that the fire itself was almost certainly an accident, saying that the initial cause of the conflagration has never been conclusively determined.[46][47] Historian Ainslie Thomas Embree stated that the official story of the attack on the train (that it was organized and carried out by people under orders from Pakistan) was entirely baseless.[48]

 

The Union government led by the Indian National Congress party in 2005 also set up a committee to probe the incident, headed up by retired Supreme Court judge Umesh Chandra Banerjee. The committee concluded that the fire had begun inside the train and was most likely accidental.[49] However, the Gujarat High Court ruled in 2006 that the matter was outside the jurisdiction of the union government, and that the committee was therefore unconstitutional.[50]

 

 

And finally do you know that the Nanavati Mehta commission actually still had the close to govt judge for sometime until he passed away and replaced by a Gujarat high court judge in a state with complete one party rule. Well I am convinced 100 percent it was impartial ..I am sure you are too.

 

The Nanavati-Mehta Commission is the commission of inquiry appointed by the government of Gujarat to probe the Godhra train burning incident of 27 February 2002. Its mandate was later enlarged to include the investigation of the 2002 Gujarat riots. It was appointed on 6 March 2002, with K. G. Shah, a retired Gujarat High Court judge, as its only member. It was later re-constituted to include G. T. Nanavati, a retired judge of the Supreme Court of India, after protests from human rights organizations over Shah's closeness to then-Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi. Akshay H. Mehta, retired judge of the Gujarat High Court, replaced Shah when the latter died before the submission of the commission's interim report.

 I know why you wanted a yes or no answer ...lol

 

 

 

 

[raki05]

7 hours ago, straighttalk said:

The term Most of you - is why I call you a * radical.and people of your ilk will tarnish the good name of Hinduism and make it persona non grata like Islam...you talk about tolerance in ancient Hinduism..yet you are full of hatred...punish the guys who committed crimes...but punish both Hindus assholes and Muslim assholes...don't call for killing innocent people. And that applies for the Muslims torching houses too. I give rats ass about religion and what irks me is how simple minded people jump on this bandwagon of hatred ..all the while the country is going to the dogs and enriching the oligarchs now or the politicians themselves earlier.

When i say most of you i am referring to radical islamist like you whose job is to brainwash poor muslims and agitate them for stone pelting and also propagate misinformation of religious disharmony,where as reality is in lasst 12-13 years we had close to zero terrorist attack, not any major riots which was kind of monthly show during your favourite appeasement political party time. All you do is you take isolated isuues that too on bjp governed state and open a thread . I should have never opened this thread had you have not shown hypocrisy and opened a thread on wb as well where your radical islamist are doing demographic changes in planned manner.

Edited April 20, 2025 by raki05

[Muloghonto]

7 hours ago, straighttalk said:

The term Most of you - is why I call you a * radical.and people of your ilk will tarnish the good name of Hinduism and make it persona non grata like Islam...you talk about tolerance in ancient Hinduism..yet you are full of hatred...punish the guys who committed crimes...but punish both Hindus assholes and Muslim assholes...don't call for killing innocent people. And that applies for the Muslims torching houses too. I give rats ass about religion and what irks me is how simple minded people jump on this bandwagon of hatred ..all the while the country is going to the dogs and enriching the oligarchs now or the politicians themselves earlier.

Why should we tolerate genocidal behaviour ?? That's like saying we should tolerate nazis coz it's just another form of political party and we have freedom to form political parties. 

 

 

Islam deserves to be hated for being orders of magnitude more violent than any religion in history. 

 

We are not calling for killing innocent people dumbass. We are calling for erasing dehati Arab demon worship religion. 

 

People fight religions all the time, this is no different. 

Edited April 20, 2025 by Muloghonto

[Muloghonto]

7 hours ago, straighttalk said:

Yes and I know you haven't read it as otherwise you wouldn't have brought it up. I will quote Wikipedia and before you say it's a leftist media..you can check the sources and provide facts that refute it. Else accept that you haven't read the report or the multiple fallacies in it or it just suits you to believe whatever you fancy 

 

 

After six years of going over the details, Nanavati-Mehta Commission submitted its preliminary report which concluded that the fire was an act of arson, committed by a mob of one to two thousand locals.[42][51] Maulvi Husain Haji Ibrahim Umarji, a cleric in Godhra, and a dismissed Central Reserve Police Force officer named Nanumiyan were presented as the "masterminds" behind the arson.[52] After 24 extensions, the commission submitted its final report on 18 November 2014.[53] The findings of the commission were called into question by a video recording released by Tehelka magazine, which showed Arvind Pandya, counsel for the Gujarat government, stating that the findings of the Shah-Nanavati commission would support the view presented by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), as Shah was "their man" and Nanavati could be bribed.[54]

 

In February 2011, the trial court convicted 31 people and acquitted 63 others based on the murder and conspiracy provisions of the Indian Penal Code, saying the incident was a "pre-planned conspiracy."[55] [56] Of those convicted, 11 were sentenced to death and the other 20 to life in prison.[57][58] Maulvi Umarji, presented by the Nanavati-Shah commission as the prime conspirator, was acquitted along with 62 others accused for lack of evidence.[59][60]

 

The primary accused was acquitted due to lack of evidence.

 

But prior to that ..have you seen how typical Bollywood style..the govt tried to subvert justice. Wonder why if they have nothing to hide.

 

The government of Gujarat set up Gujarat High Court judge K. G. Shah as a one-man commission to look into the incident,[41] but following outrage among families of victims and in the media over Shah's alleged closeness to Modi, retired Supreme Court judge G.T. Nanavati was added as chairman of the now two-person commission.[42]

 

 

And while we are on the topic of commission..did you see multiple other comission reports or did you just ignore them because they don't shut your narrative.

 

In 2003, The Concerned Citizens Tribunal (CCT)[Note 1] concluded that the fire had been an accident.[43][44][45] Several other independent commentators have also concluded that the fire itself was almost certainly an accident, saying that the initial cause of the conflagration has never been conclusively determined.[46][47] Historian Ainslie Thomas Embree stated that the official story of the attack on the train (that it was organized and carried out by people under orders from Pakistan) was entirely baseless.[48]

 

The Union government led by the Indian National Congress party in 2005 also set up a committee to probe the incident, headed up by retired Supreme Court judge Umesh Chandra Banerjee. The committee concluded that the fire had begun inside the train and was most likely accidental.[49] However, the Gujarat High Court ruled in 2006 that the matter was outside the jurisdiction of the union government, and that the committee was therefore unconstitutional.[50]

 

 

And finally do you know that the Nanavati Mehta commission actually still had the close to govt judge for sometime until he passed away and replaced by a Gujarat high court judge in a state with complete one party rule. Well I am convinced 100 percent it was impartial ..I am sure you are too.

 

The Nanavati-Mehta Commission is the commission of inquiry appointed by the government of Gujarat to probe the Godhra train burning incident of 27 February 2002. Its mandate was later enlarged to include the investigation of the 2002 Gujarat riots. It was appointed on 6 March 2002, with K. G. Shah, a retired Gujarat High Court judge, as its only member. It was later re-constituted to include G. T. Nanavati, a retired judge of the Supreme Court of India, after protests from human rights organizations over Shah's closeness to then-Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi. Akshay H. Mehta, retired judge of the Gujarat High Court, replaced Shah when the latter died before the submission of the commission's interim report.

 I know why you wanted a yes or no answer ...lol

 

 

 

 

So Muslims accidentally torched a trIn full of women and children and paid the price for it ?? 

Sounds like tit for tat to me. Not genocide. Cope. 

[straighttalk]

9 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Why should we tolerate genocidal behaviour ?? That's like saying we should tolerate nazis coz it's just another form of political party and we have freedom to form political parties. 

 

 

Islam deserves to be hated for being orders of magnitude more violent than any religion in history. 

 

We are not calling for killing innocent people dumbass. We are calling for erasing dehati Arab demon worship religion. 

 

People fight religions all the time, this is no different. 

What is the plan for fighting Islam and erasing  another religion. Through peaceful discourse encouraging conversions as you mentioned in another thread or something else.

 

What will they convert to? Hinduusom doesn't have a conversion mechanism. If they choose to identify as Hindu are you happy. And why will they choose to accept another religion. That's almost slavery. So what will encourage them to do that.

 

Just sit here and think what if this is reversed. You are here agitated over centuries old wrong done by the Moslem invaders...the time to fight was the ..why call for a futile blood bath when our country is so backwards in every respect...businessmen are looting the country and only the rich is becoming richer...no job..low education ..no healthcare...pollution population..it's in disarray..why not we as a country call on the govt to deliver on development instead of winning votes by engineering riots and communal strife to consolidate majority votes and other side using appeasement to get minority votes and hoping the Hindu vote wouldn't consolidate.

 

Also on topic.. Mamata doesn't gain by engineering violence..she loses due to he riots.. she wins by appeasing Muslims and preventing Hindu vote consolidation...we all know who gains politically from these riots... consolidate majority votes, create fear, bring down the democratically elected Govt and impose President rule..this is a tried and tested method used by the ilk all over India including Maharashtra recently..challenge is BJP doesn't have a honest grassroot leader in Bengal .they only have the corrupt ex Trinamool leaders in the party and Bengalis in general abhor the crassness of HINDUVTA..so it's not working..it would work better if BJP comes with a message of development..bcos frankly with its immense education human resources and port as well as connections...Bengal has underachieved under Mamata and communist prior to her. 

The Gujju gang thinks communal violence will consolidate Hindu votes as they don't have a development plank..might work at a huge bloodshed or can backfire if it's exposed who is behind the violence. Focus on real development message..get rid of the Suvendu Adhikari class of leaders and get some one honest and apolitical to lead .things will work better. Bengal is not cow belt..it won't work here 

[Muloghonto]

3 hours ago, straighttalk said:

What is the plan for fighting Islam and erasing  another religion. Through peaceful discourse encouraging conversions as you mentioned in another thread or something else.

 

What will they convert to? Hinduusom doesn't have a conversion mechanism. If they choose to identify as Hindu are you happy. And why will they choose to accept another religion. That's almost slavery. So what will encourage them to do that.

 

Just sit here and think what if this is reversed. You are here agitated over centuries old wrong done by the Moslem invaders...the time to fight was the ..why call for a futile blood bath when our country is so backwards in every respect...businessmen are looting the country and only the rich is becoming richer...no job..low education ..no healthcare...pollution population..it's in disarray..why not we as a country call on the govt to deliver on development instead of winning votes by engineering riots and communal strife to consolidate majority votes and other side using appeasement to get minority votes and hoping the Hindu vote wouldn't consolidate.

 

Also on topic.. Mamata doesn't gain by engineering violence..she loses due to he riots.. she wins by appeasing Muslims and preventing Hindu vote consolidation...we all know who gains politically from these riots... consolidate majority votes, create fear, bring down the democratically elected Govt and impose President rule..this is a tried and tested method used by the ilk all over India including Maharashtra recently..challenge is BJP doesn't have a honest grassroot leader in Bengal .they only have the corrupt ex Trinamool leaders in the party and Bengalis in general abhor the crassness of HINDUVTA..so it's not working..it would work better if BJP comes with a message of development..bcos frankly with its immense education human resources and port as well as connections...Bengal has underachieved under Mamata and communist prior to her. 

The Gujju gang thinks communal violence will consolidate Hindu votes as they don't have a development plank..might work at a huge bloodshed or can backfire if it's exposed who is behind the violence. Focus on real development message..get rid of the Suvendu Adhikari class of leaders and get some one honest and apolitical to lead .things will work better. Bengal is not cow belt..it won't work here 

We don't care to give equal equal in reverse. 

Remember Muslims genocide and wage war in name of religion. Hindus don't. Therefore Islam is forfeit as religion same as nazism is forfeit as political ideology. 

Mamta gains a lot by engineering riots. Don't try to teach Bengal politics to a Bengali just coz you are an islamist bootlicker. 

Backwardness is secondary to cultural and religious integrity. 

[mishra]

6 hours ago, straighttalk said:

What is the plan for fighting Islam and erasing  another religion. Through peaceful discourse encouraging conversions as you mentioned in another thread or something else.

 

What will they convert to? Hinduusom doesn't have a conversion mechanism. If they choose to identify as Hindu are you happy. And why will they choose to accept another religion. That's almost slavery. So what will encourage them to do that.

 

Just sit here and think what if this is reversed. You are here agitated over centuries old wrong done by the Moslem invaders...the time to fight was the ..why call for a futile blood bath when our country is so backwards in every respect...businessmen are looting the country and only the rich is becoming richer...no job..low education ..no healthcare...pollution population..it's in disarray..why not we as a country call on the govt to deliver on development instead of winning votes by engineering riots and communal strife to consolidate majority votes and other side using appeasement to get minority votes and hoping the Hindu vote wouldn't consolidate.

 

Also on topic.. Mamata doesn't gain by engineering violence..she loses due to he riots.. she wins by appeasing Muslims and preventing Hindu vote consolidation...we all know who gains politically from these riots... consolidate majority votes, create fear, bring down the democratically elected Govt and impose President rule..this is a tried and tested method used by the ilk all over India including Maharashtra recently..challenge is BJP doesn't have a honest grassroot leader in Bengal .they only have the corrupt ex Trinamool leaders in the party and Bengalis in general abhor the crassness of HINDUVTA..so it's not working..it would work better if BJP comes with a message of development..bcos frankly with its immense education human resources and port as well as connections...Bengal has underachieved under Mamata and communist prior to her. 

The Gujju gang thinks communal violence will consolidate Hindu votes as they don't have a development plank..might work at a huge bloodshed or can backfire if it's exposed who is behind the violence. Focus on real development message..get rid of the Suvendu Adhikari class of leaders and get some one honest and apolitical to lead .things will work better. Bengal is not cow belt..it won't work here 

Pakistan was created because people like you thought Islam was under threat. So if solution has been already implemented, why Islam is under threat agan. 
India is a country where Hindus live, That inludes RSS, Savarkar followers. Jinnah knew it very well and Muslims were given opportunity by Jinnah to moove to Pakistan. Should have taken that instead of complaining now

[Muloghonto]

Just now, mishra said:

Pakistan was created because people like you thought Islam was under threat. So if solution has been already implemented, why Islam is under threat agan. 
India is a country where Hindus live, That inludes RSS, Savarkar followers. Jinnah knew it very well and Muslims were given opportunity by Jinnah to moove to Pakistan. Should have taken that instead of complaining now

The plan for islam is simple - MBS is gonna gradually dismantle Islam in its own heartland and turn Saudi into an Italy - still get tourism from 'vaticano' but isnt thekeydaar of vaticano.

Once that happens, its gradual checkmate to dehati arbi demon worship. nightclubs in mecca is what we need.

And we will have it in another 50 years.

 

[coffee_rules]