Operation sindoor

[Austin 3:!6]

Aaj tak is now saying MEA accpted ceasefire violation and given full freedom to army? Do you guys think any offence is coming from our end or we have become real cowards?

 

I am so angry now...lol

[diga]

1 minute ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

Aaj tak is now saying MEA accpted ceasefire violation and given full freedom to army? Do you guys think any offence is coming from our end or we have become real cowards?

 

I am so angry now...lol

Aajtak can be better avoided for next few days...  

[Ranvir]

5 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

 

Pakistanis tried to hit us for straight 3 nights and there was no reaction from our end. And now we are even refusing any ceasefire violation. Cowards.

 

Another thing proven from this war is, India has no friends or allies. Turkiye, Azerbeijan and China standing like rock with Pakistan and no one was with us. Modi's supposed friend Trump also gave haath and tried to act neutral.

 

I think we all have over estimated Modi's 56 inch chest. I am his big fan too but what happened today is cowardly and will forever dent his legacy. Indira Gandhi shown much more courage in 1971.

Don't ever expect support from Mohammedans. I consider them all to be like Pakistanis. Whether it is Saudi, Iran, Indonesia.

 

China has always been a rival.

 

India used to have Russia's support back in the day but they're useless nowadays and tied up in their own mess.

 

America were watching to see what Pukstaan's Chinese weapons were capable of. 

 

Modi is an illiterate man. It's a complete joke that someone as dumb as him is able to be prime minister. The semi educated Indira was on another level of intellect to him and I say that as someone who despises her. Time to end democracy in India and allowing illiterates vote in illiterates.

[MK55]

India has become a laughing stock in the media world. Also I don’t understand how is every F news outlet outside India not giving any credibility to our operations. Media narrative matters as now this just encourages them to continue such attacks. 

And what was this cowardly fascination of “Tit for Tat”. These delusional politicians don’t understand the simple fact that after an incident like that, they had to inflict at least 3 times the damage for future deterrence. The army was totally capable of doing that. Their air bases needed to be completely wiped out with substantial damage at each one that was targeted.  And it had to be quick too - perhaps the most important thing. 

The press conferences also sounded as if they are afraid to do anything that’s even slightly more offensive. And these morons couldn’t take a firm stance when Trump administration called? I’m sure they would have not stopped our operations unless things were becoming nuclear.  That’s why quickness matters. There was always going to be pressure at some point to stop the attacks.
 

 

[Austin 3:!6]

9 minutes ago, diga said:

Aajtak can be better avoided for next few days...  

 

Do you think its over or anything can still happen from our side? Pakistani are celebrating victory all over

[diga]

1 minute ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

 

Do you think its over or anything can still happen from our side? Pakistani are celebrating victory all over

After losing much of their infrastructure of air force base... Delusional world they live 

[Ranvir]

12 hours ago, ravishingravi said:

 

In your dreams

I told you. Stop watching Wion and Republic TV. Joke channels.

[Austin 3:!6]

2 minutes ago, MK55 said:

India has become a laughing stock in the media world. Also I don’t understand how is every F news outlet outside India not giving any credibility to our operations. Media narrative matters as now this just encourages them to continue such attacks. 

And what was this cowardly fascination of “Tit for Tat”. These delusional politicians don’t understand the simple fact that after an incident like that, they had to inflict at least 3 times the damage for future deterrence. The army was totally capable of doing that. Their air bases needed to be completely wiped out with substantial damage at each one that was targeted.  And it had to be quick too - perhaps the most important thing. 

The press conferences also sounded as if they are afraid to do anything that’s even slightly more offensive. And these morons couldn’t take a firm stance when Trump administration called? I’m sure they would have not stopped our operations unless things were becoming nuclear.  That’s why quickness matters. There was always going to be pressure at some point to stop the attacks.
 

 

 

Could it be a case of India is intentionally doing it to show the world that Pakistan is breaking ceasefire even after Trump's ultimatum where as India are good boys? In that way, India can go full attack more with US supporting us or atleast not asking us to stop.

 

If we actually dont do anything after this...then we are super cucks.

[MK55]

Just now, Austin 3:!6 said:

 

Could it be a case of India is intentionally doing it to show the world that Pakistan is breaking ceasefire even after Trump's ultimatum where as India are good boys? In that way, India can go full attack more with US supporting us or atleast not asking us to stop.

 

If we actually dont do anything after this...then we are super cucks.

I wish that was the case. But it’s a gray area now unless they clearly stated what would constitute going on a full attack mode. I highly doubt that. 

 

The problem with the environment we have to deal with is that, now they would probably not attack us directly but via proxy terror groups for a while. And then gradually resort back to their non sense. And then we will start all over again with measured retaliations. 

[MK55]

Our first retaliations were on point. but when they launched towards are defence infrastructure as a counter move, that would have been the opportunity to retaliate quickly and much more decisively and putting aside the measured Tit for Tat tactics.  
Snd then I’m sure there would have been calls for ceasefire and that could have been a good exit path. 

[Ranvir]

6 minutes ago, MK55 said:

Our first retaliations were on point. but when they launched towards are defence infrastructure as a counter move, that would have been the opportunity to retaliate quickly and much more decisively and putting aside the measured Tit for Tat tactics.  
Snd then I’m sure there would have been calls for ceasefire and that could have been a good exit path. 

If you're going to attack, might as well go for shock and awe. Not this half assed crap. Might as well cry 'terrorists neighbours boo hoo' like in 2001 and 2008, at least you get some sympathy rather than embarrassment.

[Austin 3:!6]

We also need to talk about that basket IMF for approving the loan. It was nothing for legal terrorist funding.

[raki05]

1 hour ago, Ranvir said:

Modi pu$$ied out and went woke.

 

What was the point of having those two women give the press conference? Especially in a largely non woke country like India.

 

What happened to all of the grand delusions posted by some of the people here? 

 

Modi's military record is a joke. First the tea is fantastic stuff and now this. Time to hand over the country to someone with balls and half a brain.

Leli gangs are back with bang!!

[raki05]

How come pakistani pm is announcing it as victory and idiot modi is silent……why we even accepted ceasefire. Bloddy hypocrite why they dont counter pakistani narrative. This is utter if we really detroyed their military infra and succefully protected ours why dont they show it to world mwdia. BTW how can you not able to make surrendered a war ridden pakistan from all side. This is utter pathetic if it end at this.

[EnterTheVoid]

Am I missing something?

 

India attacked terrorist targets deep inside Pakistan proper and held the fort against their response.

 

They showed the world they'll do precision strikes against Pakistan in Pakistan. And that would be a precedent going forward if Pakistan did any terrorist attacks via their proxies.

 

Wasn't that the end goal? India's purpose was not regime change or to take back any territory.

[raki05]

1 minute ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Am I missing something?

 

India attacked terrorist targets deep inside Pakistan proper and held the fort against their response.

 

They showed the world they'll do precision strikes against Pakistan in Pakistan. And that would be a precedent going forward if Pakistan did any terrorist attacks via their proxies.

 

Wasn't that the end goal? India's purpose was not regime change or to take back any territory.

But why india went for ceasefire against pakistani retaliation as circulating in world media. When yoi do precise attack pak had to retaliate in response why we dint keep on retaliating than taking this ceasefire BS.

[Ranvir]

3 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Am I missing something?

 

India attacked terrorist targets deep inside Pakistan proper and held the fort against their response.

 

They showed the world they'll do precision strikes against Pakistan in Pakistan. And that would be a precedent going forward if Pakistan did any terrorist attacks via their proxies.

 

Wasn't that the end goal? India's purpose was not regime change or to take back any territory.

Yes but Pakistan apparently violated the ceasefire and India did nothing in return.

[EnterTheVoid]

3 minutes ago, raki05 said:

But why india went for ceasefire against pakistani retaliation as circulating in world media. When yoi do precise attack pak had to retaliate in response why we dint keep on retaliating than taking this ceasefire BS.

 

Our retaliation was in response and not retaliation for the sake of retaliation.

 

Our position was retaliate and not escalate. Which we did.

[raki05]

1 minute ago, EnterTheVoid said:

 

Our retaliation was in response and not retaliation for the sake of retaliation.

 

Our position was retaliate and not escalate. Which we did.

Ok then why we went to ceasefire if pakistani dint demand for it. It shows that we attacked them and when they attacked in response we agreed to ceasefire even when the other party dint ask for it. Tell me how attacking launchpad would help us in future when pakistani dint accept it and retaliated in response and supposedly made us accept ceasefire. Tell me how this will act as deterrent fir future terror attack when your enemy dint accept any of this and clamming that they forced us to invoke ceasefire through Americans.

[MK55]

Our goal should have been to cause a substantial deterrent. That’s difficult since we are both nuclear nations. But they literally walked into a bait and that was the perfect opportunity to an achieve that goal. It was good that we were able to execute surgical attacks but that’s not a good enough deterrent.


What we instead achieved was a media circus with the opposition claiming they “won” and that their actions prompted us to accept the ceasefire asap. Instead of deterrence looks like these guys are encouraged even more now.  Plus the world understands that we can’t take a firm zero tolerance stance. 

Edited May 10, 2025 by MK55