Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, rangeelaraja said:

Looks like what we did to 10-11 airbases hurt them very very hard. We should have continued for another 2 days atleast. 
 

 

 

 

This seems to align with what we witnessed.

Pakistan didn't expect us to hit terrorist targets/infrastructure within Pakistan proper. They responded by sending drones. We retaliated by cratering their airports. They came to their senses and initiated the ceasefire.


Pakistan can't give state protection to terrorists and hide behind the "we are a nuclear power, can't attack us" card. Operation Sindoor shot that logic out of the sky :isalute:

Posted

A Quiet Operational Success

That misleading narrative obscures a more consequential truth: despite Pakistani tactical successes, India appears to have largely achieved its stated objectives. On the opening day of strikes, the Indian Air Force (IAF) demonstrated a credible capacity to identify and destroy what New Delhi characterised as terrorist-linked infrastructure in Pakistani territory, employing stand-off weapons to deliver precision strikes at speed. In the following days, operations expanded in scope, penetrating Pakistan’s Chinese-supplied air defence network to target select forward airbases for the first time since the 1971 war.

 

While losses were incurred, these must be evaluated against the scale and complexity of the mission – not simply tallied in isolation. The mere fact that the Indian Air Force could strike targets under defended conditions and undertake follow-on attacks demonstrates its capacity for coercive precision operations.

 

https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/calibrated-force-operation-sindoor-and-future-indian-deterrence

 

:isalute:

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

 

This seems to align with what we witnessed.

Pakistan didn't expect us to hit terrorist targets/infrastructure within Pakistan proper. They responded by sending drones. We retaliated by cratering their airports. They came to their senses and initiated the ceasefire.


Pakistan can't give state protection to terrorists and hide behind the "we are a nuclear power, can't attack us" card. Operation Sindoor shot that logic out of the sky :isalute:

 

Air bases were hit not because of Pak drones. Those Asisguard drones were being neutralized before they could cause any major damage. 

 

It was only after ballistic missiles were fired at residential areas (non military) in Delhi and Amritsar (Golden Temple) was when we took things to the next level and fired Brahmos at their air bases.

Edited by MechEng
Posted

Brahmos certainly isn't a cost effective solution.  That's why it was only used to take out high value Targets aka RYK airbase.

 

Precision guided hammer even though imported is much cheaper.

 

India's indigenous precision guided TARA went into trails a month ago.

Jaguars and MKI will be equipped with those.

 

We are rapidly improving when it comes to missile tech.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Brahmos certainly isn't a cost effective solution.  That's why it was only used to take out high value Targets aka RYK airbase.

 

Precision guided hammer even though imported is much cheaper.

 

India's indigenous precision guided TARA went into trails a month ago.

Jaguars and MKI will be equipped with those.

 

We are rapidly improving when it comes to missile tech.

 

This is still a 3rd gen aircraft. God knows when we will get rid of that.

 

Brahmos is damn expensive but it's fast and has precision strikes. Akash SAM and L70 production needs to be expanded up so that we can cover the entire Western & Eastern borders.

Posted
14 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

This is still a 3rd gen aircraft. God knows when we will get rid of that.

 

Brahmos is damn expensive but it's fast and has precision strikes. Akash SAM and L70 production needs to be expanded up so that we can cover the entire Western & Eastern borders.

Jaguars are in process of upgradation since last year or so..

Besides they act as our nuclear bomber fleet.. spares aren't an issue.

I get it is old and much maligned but without strategic bombers.. it has its usage.

Until MK2 squadrons line up it will go beyond 2035.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Jaguars are in process of upgradation since last year or so..

Besides they act as our nuclear bomber fleet.. spares aren't an issue.

I get it is old and much maligned but without strategic bombers.. it has its usage.

Until MK2 squadrons line up it will go beyond 2035.

 

Why does India have so many varieties? Jaguars, MIG, Tejas, sukhois, Mirage, now  Rafale.

 

Maintenance, parts, of all such varieties is a nightmare 

Posted
2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Why does India have so many varieties? Jaguars, MIG, Tejas, sukhois, Mirage, now  Rafale.

 

Maintenance, parts, of all such varieties is a nightmare 

We have source code of Sukhois as of 2024... Can do any kind of upgradation & integration with it.

Tejas programme is indigenous minus engine and some other technical stuff. 

It is expected to replace older Mig and Jaguars when sufficient numbers will be achieved.

 

MIG act as interceptors meanwhile.. Navy uses Mig29k on our carriers.

 

Rafale is silver bullet as of now. 

 

IAF has been a mess for long but hopefully we keep improving after these ops.  Already massive improvement since that incident in 2019.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Why does India have so many varieties? Jaguars, MIG, Tejas, sukhois, Mirage, now  Rafale.

 

Maintenance, parts, of all such varieties is a nightmare 

Two buckets. French dassault and russian. We largely rely on mki. Tejas has a long way to go. Mk2 might be a start.

Posted

What is the purpose of these 7 teams which have gone across countries ? Whom are they meeting and telling what ? WB is already planning to give them 20b

×
×
  • Create New...