lemsip Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 6 minutes ago, tweaker said: England bat deep and we need extra bowlers if their batters are in form. There is no point adding ineffectual bowlers to make up the numbers. India would be better served by having Kuldeep in the side as a genuine wickettaker rather than a trundler just to make up a seamer quota. tweaker 1
rkt.india Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 26 minutes ago, lemsip said: There is no point adding ineffectual bowlers to make up the numbers. India would be better served by having Kuldeep in the side as a genuine wickettaker rather than a trundler just to make up a seamer quota. Yes if pitches are grass free, kuldeep will do well against the lower order.
lemsip Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 25 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Yes if pitches are grass free, kuldeep will do well against the lower order. Also look at what England are doing. Regardless of conditions, they are certain to play Bashir who is not on the same planet as Kuleep as a spinner and wicket taker. All he does is bowl long spells to allow their seamers to rest and rotate without giving too many runs away. Kuleep should be able to do a lot more than that. tweaker and BacktoCricaddict 2
test fan Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 When we understand that Reddy is not a test level bowler even as fifth bowling options . Stop suggesting he should play as an all-rounder. Adamant 1
Adamant Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 Shardul should play ahead of Reddy and it shouldn’t even be a debate.
BacktoCricaddict Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 Can the Abhimanyu experiment end now? They dropped Sarfaraz to slot this guy in. And he's out cheaply again. Adamant, cowboysfan and express bowling 3
cowboysfan Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 12 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Can the Abhimanyu experiment end now? They dropped Sarfaraz to slot this guy in. And he's out cheaply again. so unfair,dude is trying to get better.
vishalvirsingh Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 Reddy should play ahead of Shardul ( shardul is not at his prime). if coach feels Reddy is not bowling well then, we should play 4 Pacers and Jaddu. 4th Pacer can be Harshit Or Arshdeep. Line Up should be- Yashasvi KL rahul Nair Or
putrevus Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 Morons dropped Sarfraz again. Sarfraz nearly adds 200 runs after early wickets in last match but gets dropped for this one. This guy has been treated very harshly.
rkt.india Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 5 minutes ago, putrevus said: Morons dropped Sarfraz again. Sarfraz nearly adds 200 runs after early wickets in last match but gets dropped for this one. This guy has been treated very harshly. Sarfaraz isn't in the test squad. Players who are in test squad are playing.
rkt.india Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 52 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Can the Abhimanyu experiment end now? They dropped Sarfaraz to slot this guy in. And he's out cheaply again. He is the captain of this team so had to play.
rkt.india Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 1 hour ago, Adamant said: Shardul should play ahead of Reddy and it shouldn’t even be a debate. Shardul is a bowler who can bat. Reddy is a batsman who can bowl. Two completely different positions.
rkt.india Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 (edited) 4 hours ago, lemsip said: Also look at what England are doing. Regardless of conditions, they are certain to play Bashir who is not on the same planet as Kuleep as a spinner and wicket taker. All he does is bowl long spells to allow their seamers to rest and rotate without giving too many runs away. Kuleep should be able to do a lot more than that. We have Jadeja for the role bashir is doing. Bashir is a lone spinner, kuldeep will play as second spinner so no comparison between the two. Edited June 6, 2025 by rkt.india
putrevus Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 1 minute ago, rkt.india said: Sarfaraz isn't in the test squad. Players who are in test squad are playing. He should have been in the squad.He should be batting number 5 for India. How many more tests does Rahul need to prove himself for his 33 avg.
putrevus Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 2 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Shardul is a bowler who can bat. Reddy is a batsman who can bowl. Two completely different positions. Who is needed more for this team? A bowler who can bat or batsman who can bowl.
BacktoCricaddict Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 (edited) 23 hours ago, rkt.india said: He is the captain of this team so had to play. Oh come on. Like they can't shuffle these things around in an A matchup? Edited June 7, 2025 by BacktoCricaddict
Nikhil_cric Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 Reddy at #6 and Shardul at #7 is one position too high for both of them .
cowboysfan Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 26 minutes ago, putrevus said: Morons dropped Sarfraz again. Sarfraz nearly adds 200 runs after early wickets in last match but gets dropped for this one. This guy has been treated very harshly. his fate was sealed wen he didnt make the Test Squad,i hope he is the first one who gets in if we have an injured batter.
coffee_rules Posted June 6, 2025 Posted June 6, 2025 23 minutes ago, putrevus said: He should have been in the squad.He should be batting number 5 for India. How many more tests does Rahul need to prove himself for his 33 avg. Without Kohli and Rohit, he was a shoo-in, esp when he is slotted to open in Eng. He did a decent job in the series we squared 2-2 last time. He also did ok in SA. Since the SA series, he was made captain and it all went down for him. He will not be playing in the MO as a wkt-keeper bat for sure.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now