Jump to content

‘Blatant favouritism’ - Shubman Gill & Co face severe backlash after Arshdeep Singh warms bench during IND vs NZ 1st ODI


Recommended Posts

Posted

‘Blatant favouritism’ - Shubman Gill & Co face severe backlash after Arshdeep Singh warms bench during IND vs NZ 1st ODI

The exclusion of Arshdeep Singh didn't go well with the fans and experts in the first ODI against New Zealand. Instead, India went with the likes of Harshit Rana, Prasidh Krishna and Mohammed Siraj.

Arshdeep Singh has been overlooked in the first ODI against New Zealand.

Arshdeep Singh has been overlooked in the first ODI against New Zealand. (AFP)

 

The Indian team management faced severe backlash on Sunday after the Men in Blue benched Arshdeep Singh in the first ODI against New Zealand at the BCA stadium in Vadodara. The decision to bench Arshdeep not only took the experts by surprise, but it also drew sharp reactions online.

 

In the absence of Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj led the Indian pace bowling attack, along Prasidh Krishna and Harshit Rana in the playing XI. The criticism stemmed after Arshdeep didn't find a place despite being most economical in the ODI series against South Africa.

 

When asked about the combination, captain Shubman Gill ruled it out as “trying different combinations” before the 2027 World Cup. “We will bowl first. Honestly, try different kinds of combinations, you know, see what combination suits us the best for different conditions, obviously when we play in India,” Gill told toss presenter Ravi Shastri.

 

However, Gill's words didn't satisfy the fans. “They dropped Arshdeep Singh who was the most economical bowler for India in the last ODI series but run-machine Prasidh Krishna is still in the Playing 11. This is blatant favouritism!!!” said one user on X.

“So you are telling me we are going with Prasidh Krishna instead of Arshdeep Singh. Isn't it obvious favouritism,” said another.

 

 

“From Harshit to Prasidh: The Ongoing Snub of Arshdeep Singh - It feels like not selecting Arshdeep in the team has simply become a hobby for this team management,” another user wrote on X.

"Prasidh Krishna, who is an inconsistent performer and a run-leaking machine, is getting chances over Arshdeep. Sometimes Harshit plays in Arshdeep's place, sometimes Prasidh. Why does no one question these nonsensical tactics of the team management?" the post further read.

 

 

 

Arshdeep Singh's performances in ODIs

The criticism around Krishna and Rana came after the duo were behind Arshdeep in terms of economy in the ODI series against South Africa. The left-arm seamer was India's most consistent performer against the Proteas with five wickets in three games at an economy of 5.50.

 

In comparison, Rana leaked runs at an economy of 6.39, picking up four wickets. Krishna had the worst economy - 7.80 - in the three ODIs against South Africa. Besides the three-man pace attack, India have also gone with three spinners - Kuldeep Yadav, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar.

 

Posted

Though I support Arshdeep in general, won't read too much into this series. Main aim here must be that none of our players gets injured or fatigued so close to T20 WC. 

Posted (edited)

Selecting Arsh is not good idea if they are looking at him as longterm but if they are just giving him games to build up strength and stamina then its okay.

 

He is no special , but run of the mill Odi bowler and loses steam after 1st spell in odis. Its better he concentrate in t20is.

 

But if he is benching then he xould have played smat for pjb

 

 

 

 

Edited by tapandrun
Posted (edited)

ICT fans collective IQ in a nutshell.  Both Harshit and Prasidh bowled pretty well in last game.

 

Arshdeep is pretty substandard in his second and final spell (death).

His new ball bowling is only area where he Trumps these two.

 

Let him focus on T20 WC rather than these low intensity bilateral 

 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted
2 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

ICT fans collective IQ in a nutshell.  Both Harshit and Prasidh bowled pretty well in last game.

 

Arshdeep is pretty substandard in his second and final spell (death).

His new ball bowling is only area where he Trumps these two.

 

Let him focus on T20 WC rather than these low intensity bilateral 

 

Should have played vht inplace of these odis

Posted
9 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

ICT fans collective IQ in a nutshell.  Both Harshit and Prasidh bowled pretty well in last game.

 

Arshdeep is pretty substandard in his second and final spell (death).

His new ball bowling is only area where he Trumps these two.

 

Let him focus on T20 WC rather than these low intensity bilateral 

 

Rana is a must, but PK is mediocre. Arsh did help us win an ODI series in RSA 2 years back, should be in the scheme of things. 

Posted

Arshdeep has not mastered the ODi bowling craft yet. Once Siraj takes a break he can walk in. ODI bowling requires consistency not just variations.  Harshit Rana is doing the role that Chetan sharma used to do although Chetan was more than a decent bat. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Rana is a must, but PK is mediocre. Arsh did help us win an ODI series in RSA 2 years back, should be in the scheme of things. 

Yeah I remember that series. Arshdeep bowled well there also lord Mukku Kumar and Avesh were his partners.

 

Current attack for what it's worth is massive upgrade on that:phehe:

 

I have my reservations with PK as well.  I'd rather have Gurnoor Brar and Ashok Sharma being tried in ODIs over him.  Selectors have been very rigid not picking inform players for key spots 

Posted
44 minutes ago, tapandrun said:

This is exactly what Ind fans/pr does they confuses formats...

 

Arash is good in T20s not so in Odis, he kind of loses gas after 1st spell.

In parts you have to bowl like test match in ODIs. Not always. But sometimes sticking to line and length is all you need. If Arshdeep wants to become a good all phase ODI bowler he should play more first class games where he bowls a lot of overs not just 4 or 10. Train your muscles to repeat stuffs. In T20 you don't have to repeat things. You can bowl 24 diffeent slower balls as one mahaahn named Harshal patel said once

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

In parts you have to bowl like test match in ODIs. Not always. But sometimes sticking to line and length is all you need. If Arshdeep wants to become a good all phase ODI bowler he should play more first class games where he bowls a lot of overs not just 4 or 10. Train your muscles to repeat stuffs. In T20 you don't have to repeat things. You can bowl 24 diffeent slower balls as one mahaahn named Harshal patel said once

based on observation a good t20 bowler has to have good bowling skills (test bowling):: -- pace, bounce and yorkers an over that add white-ball skills like slower one slow bumper.

 

those out and out t20 bowlers do not last long and get found-out after couple of seasons, only player that comes to mind having a longer career was bravo but he was good batter too... so the seasons where his bowling was not working he can rely on batting..

 

Edited by tapandrun
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Some really dumb fans/paid accounts on X who want Rana dropped for Arshdeep in ODI's.

 

Simply can't be taken seriously 

But prasidh has an economy rate of 7 in tests,howcome no one will not call him out

He's highly unreliable nor has anything between his ears 

Edited by Suhaan
Posted
8 hours ago, Suhaan said:

But prasidh has an economy rate of 7 in tests,howcome no one will not call him out

He's highly unreliable nor has anything between his ears 

Prasidh doesn't have the numbers , I agree.  But at least we can see why they see backing him - pace and high release point.

 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, tapandrun said:

This is exactly what Ind fans/pr does they confuses formats...

 

Arash is good in T20s not so in Odis, he kind of loses gas after 1st spell.

We won a odi series in South Africa because of his bowling 

Posted
14 hours ago, Gollum said:

Rana is a must, but PK is mediocre. Arsh did help us win an ODI series in RSA 2 years back, should be in the scheme of things. 

Krishna not good enough 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...