StriKe Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I've got a reply for this but it would sound awkward. :P :hysterical:
Crookbond Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I've got a reply for this but it would sound awkward. :P :cantstop:
Desi Cartman Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Hang on' date=' did India lose to England at home ?[/quote'] oh Result England won the 4-match series 2–1 :sniffle:
Muloghonto Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Last couple of years which Cook had is hard to replicate, I don't think Sachin ever had the run which Cook has in last couple of years. He is just rock solid nothing bothers him, let us see if this ODI stint will be his downfall.He started to look like he is getting Gambhiritis poking outside off stump in odi to get singles which signaled the end of Gambhir. Err, Cookie has had a monster 2011 (averages 85 or so) and has had decent last two years (averages high 40s in 2012 and so far in 2013). He *may* get there if he plays till 40 or so because while England plays more tests than India and Cookie being an opener gets more innings/test (Cookie has 1.77 innnigs per test, Goddy has 1.65 innings per test IIRC) , he definitely is not approaching Goddy's average, especially when he averages 45 at home. As for those who think Tendulkar has not had monster years- 2010 was a monster year for him and Tendy averages 59 over 257 innings between 1993 and 2010. That's 18 years averaging almost 60 and Cookie will need atleast 30-40 more innings than Tendy to match his record. Possible but if Goddy bats well and lasts another year, it'd be nearly impossible ( between now and Dec 2014 India plays 17 tests).
Trichromatic Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Last couple of years which Cook had is hard to replicate' date=' [b']I don't think Sachin ever had the run which Cook has in last couple of years. He is just rock solid nothing bothers him, let us see if this ODI stint will be his downfall.He started to look like he is getting Gambhiritis poking outside off stump in odi to get singles which signaled the end of Gambhir. What about Sachin from 1997-2002?
vvvslaxman Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 calendar year record. Cook hasn't reached the heights that others have reached.
vvvslaxman Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 India hardly played tests in the mid 90s.. Tendulkar lost a lot of tests in his prime.
FischerTal Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 India hardly played tests in the mid 90s.. Tendulkar lost a lot of tests in his prime. :agree: i would have loved to see more battles between sachin and "ATG" padosis in tests
vvvslaxman Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 It is amazing Sehwag scored more than 1400 runs twice in three years (2008,2010) wow.. phenomenal for someone with that type of game.
philcric Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 1990's ... Eng played 107 tests Ind played 69 tests 2000's ... Eng played 129 tests Ind played 103 tests 2010's ... Eng played 42 tests Ind played 39 tests
Abhilash123 Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 :hysterical:I've got a reply for this but it would sound awkward. :P
vamos_rafa Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Sachin has been averagin 50+ since May 1997. That's effing 16 years with 50+ average. That's some amazing consistency. Sachin has had monster years as well, but barring 2-3 years, he generally has been consistent. So, to emulate him, it has to be constant performance right through.
Detonator Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 I've got a reply for this but it would sound awkward. :P :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical:
G_B_ Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Cook has nearly played 100 test matches and is 28 Fair to say he will be playing till around 36. So 8 years to go and 15 tests per year means about 120 tests more 120 tests is about 240 innings per test. Lets put it down to 220 innings for follow ons and innings victories. So 220 innings x an average of 45 is about 9900 runs. More than averages Cook and England play a tremendous amount of test cricket. So long as he averages above 40 and lasts till 36 without injury the highest run scorer tag is in his bag.
rkt.india Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Lets talk when he does that! till then :beer_yum:
saneindian Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Cook has nearly played 100 test matches and is 28 Fair to say he will be playing till around 36. So 8 years to go and 15 tests per year means about 120 tests more 120 tests is about 240 innings per test. Lets put it down to 220 innings for follow ons and innings victories. So 220 innings x an average of 45 is about 9900 runs. More than averages Cook and England play a tremendous amount of test cricket. So long as he averages above 40 and lasts till 36 without injury the highest run scorer tag is in his bag. How many post 90s English players have played for longer than 13-14 years? Forget the bowlers, no batsman has played for that long. Cook IMO will go till about 135-140 tests at max, ehis captaincy cutting short his career. Would mean him being the captain for about 50 tests, by then England would enter into a cycle of defeats, Cook will lose his captaincy and the place in the side.
G_B_ Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 How many post 90s English players have played for longer than 13-14 years? Forget the bowlers' date=' no batsman has played for that long. Cook IMO will go till about 135-140 tests at max, ehis captaincy cutting short his career. Would mean him being the captain for about 50 tests, by then England would enter into a cycle of defeats, Cook will lose his captaincy and the place in the side.[/quote'] Stauss and Vaughan played till they are about 35-36 in age . I dont think that anybody has played 13-14 years. But thats cause most english batsman barring cook and now root have made their debuts when they are in the 26-28 bracket. 140 tests from the 92 currently means cook means 48 tests or effectively 3-4 years more. He will have to go through a drastic slump in form for that to happen.
ravishingravi Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 I wouldn't bet against him. Esp. with bowling attacks on display.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now