randomGuy Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 Feel bad!!!you feel bad for him' date='feel bad for us fans that we have to bear the brunt of the kunts like sharma and koomarand the torture never ends.[/quote'] If we are feeling the brunt of having sharma and Kumar, sharma is feeling the brunt of losing the match single handedly and the embarrassment of giving away 30 runs in an over. Surely, sharma is worse off than us at the moment, hence I feel bad for him.
vayuu1 Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 Here are some one liners on pissu on twitter Author : Ajith 1. Ishant Sharma is God’s answer to BCCI’s wrongdoings. 2. Newton’s 3rd law modified: For every N Srinivasan, there is an equal and opposite Ishant Sharma. 3. Dear Dhoni, Ishant Sharma ko OLX pe bech de. 4. Ishant Sharma makes people miss Ashish Nehra. 5. Dhoni would have bowled better than Ishant Sharma. In fact, even Duncan Fletcher would have. 6. It wasn’t Faulkner, it wasn’t Voges. Australia’s match winner tonight was Ishant Sharma. 7. If ever there was an Orange Cap award for bowlers, Ishant Sharma would win it hands down. 8. Ajit Agarkar would be having second thoughts on his retirement after looking at Ishant Sharma bowl. 9. Restaurants to rename ‘unlimited’ offer packages to ‘Ishant Sharma’ packages. 10. Ishant Sharma should be called Lord Ishant Sharma henceforth. 11. Ishant Sharma doesn’t like to cut his hair because he wants to hide his face when bowlers thrash him around the park. 12. BCCI should consider giving Ishant Shamra voluntary retirement. 13. When Ishant Sharma bowls, it’s a working holiday for all fielders. Of course, the spectators are the real fielders. 14. Ishant Sharma doesn’t need a towel to indicate that he’s giving away runs. 15. Colors to give Ishant Sharma a wild card entry to Big Boss season 7. 16. Abey Kuruvilla can bowl better than Ishant Sharma. 17. Dhoni isn’t India’s greatest finisher, Ishant Sharma is. 18. Ishant Sharma has the ability to overshadow Sir Ravindra Jadeja. 19. At this rate, Ishant Sharma would end up with the most number of centuries (with the ball) for India in ODIs. 20. LOL is Ishant Sharma’s middle name. Also Read
vayuu1 Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 And more Indian bowler Ishant Sharma was trending on Twitter on Saturday night after he was hit for 30 runs in an over by James Faulkner. Sharma's dismal bowling resulted in Australia getting back in the game that they went on to win the Mohali ODI to lead the series 2-1 as the two teams duel for the No1 ODI ranking. Indian captain MS Dhoni had earlier scored his 9th ODI 100 as he lead the team to 303, a score that was defendable. Australia lost wickets at regular intervals and were behind India in the run chase after losing wickets in a heap mid-way. It was Sharma's over that brought the visitors back in the game as the game changed completely. Here are some interesting tweets, The very first thing Ishant Sharma needs to do is meet Jawed Habib and get rid of his "ज़ुल्फें" — #EkU (@_ePerceptions) October 19, 2013 Ishant Sharma surpasses Sir Bradman as the greatest cricketer to have played for Australia. #Respect #Mohali — Psycho (@i_Psycho) October 19, 2013 If James Faulkner stole the game, Ishant Sharma was the security guard who fell asleep on duty. — Samit Malkani (@JediByKnight) October 19, 2013 James Faulkner has just hit 30 off one Ishant Sharma over! Unbelievable hitting and even more unbelievably bad bowling. #IndvAus — Freddie Wilde (@fwildecricket) October 19, 2013 The only two players who can change the game at the last point are MS Dhoni and Ishant Sharma.! — Sanjeevan Sharma (@SharmaSanjeevan) October 19, 2013 James Faulkner's knock also earned him a lot of praise as he stole the game from MS Dhoni and India. Here are some tweets, My name Faulkner, James Faulkner and i luv Ishant Sharma, :) @ImIshant #IndvsAus — Imran Malik (@MalikImrank) October 19, 2013 With 44 needed off 18, India seemed to have the match well within their grasp. Then James Faulkner slammed 30 off an Ishant Sharma over,... — Abdul Rehman (@cricketforum) October 19, 2013
rkt.india Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 Looked at his FC record.. Outside test cricket, he averages 22-23 in Ranji, Duleep and India A matches lol. Most likely will go back to domestic cricket, pick truck loads of wickets and comeback to the side soon IF he is indeed dropped. He did well when he was good. I think he will struggle if he bowls like this.
rkt.india Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 ^^ I wish it was so easy. Remember not so long ago the bowling attack had Zaheer, Nehra, Sreesanth, Munaf and Pathan as the key pacers. In about 18-20 months, we have a completely new bowling attack which has been doing well for last 10-12 months. No one would have known that the same bowling attack which was doing so well in CT in Eng would be struggling this much a couple of months later. The argument that can given as to why they are still sticking with Ishant is that he can still hit the 86-87 mph mark when in good rhythm, plus the experience factor. Just that he's been absolutely horrible when bowling bad and hasnt picked wickets. A few dropped catches havent helped his confidence either. Same with Vinay, hasnt got much movement with the new ball, bowled without control and has been terrible with the old ball. Obviously for 4 matches in row, the current bunch have failed now so a change is needed. For the sake of the new bowlers who'll come in, I hope the pitches in the remaining matches are a bit more bowler friendly. Problem is wrong basics for Ishant. He is not hitting 86-87 mph. His average pace is as quick as BK or VK around 82 mph in this series. His pace varies too much because of those wrong basics, poor seam, poor wrist position, falling to left side to get outswing. He has stopped concentrating on this main weapon which was inswing and instead trying to get outswing and losing his action. He is running in gingerly because he is low in confidence and losing pace. I was watching his 2008 CB series videos yesterday and could see the difference. He is nothing if he cannot bowl 140K plus because he does not have swing of BK.
rkt.india Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 He's only 24. Hopefully experience will mean his batting will improve as his bowling has improved. IPL cricket will hopefully improve his ability to score quickly but commentators did mention that seven is a tough position. You need to either be able to rebuild a broken innings or accelerate immediately. Neither role is easy. He did well while batting in CT and his batting played a crucial tole winning us SA and final match against England, scored quickly.
rkt.india Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 That's good he's 24. I'm also 24. Look, he hasn't shown any big improvement in batting. He's a better bowler now but that's because he darts. He's going to get hit facing better batsman. His batting is still the same. I don't know how you are saying it's improved. If he can't bat at home, then he sure as hell ain't going to anything in Australia. We need to start picking and experimenting players for the world cup now. I've seen enough of Jadeja. Looks like Jadeja failing to get 20 runs off of 12 balls in the WC will show you the light also. :lightbulb: His batting played a crucial tole winning us SA and final match against England, scored quickly. 29 ball 47 against SA, 21 ball 33 not out against England. It becomes difficult for a player who does not get to bat regularly.
rkt.india Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 I would actually like a lot of A team tours to take place, both home and away. It is happening now and should not stop. They mimic conditions faced in international cricket much better. We should pick players with actual international potential in the A teams and pick the performers over some time among them in our international side. Currently we are not picking the A teams too astutely. That is why it was frustrating to see Vinay Kumar and Sumit Narwal in India A team against WI.
rkt.india Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 Yes. India A selection should be very serious part of a long process which results in India selection. When they toured England' date=' there was a guy called Ganapathy who I know longer see in zonal sides. Jaskaran Singh played for India A despite not being able to get into his state team. ![/quote'] Ganpathy does not even play for his state team Tamilnadu now. he was pathetic bowler, poor version of Vinay Kumar, you can say. Jaskaran was selected based on IPL for India A team. While he was not anything special even in IPL.
express bowling Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 Somebody was suggesting that we had done well with this bowling attack in the last year or so. Hence, we should be patient. We did not have the same bowling lineup really in the pace department. We had -- Umesh - genuinely fast , wicket taking , expensive BK - medium fast , swing and seam, wicket taking Ishant - fast medium, bouncy, idiotic We have -- Vinay - medium pace, expensive, non strike bowler, little swing, no bounce BK - medium pace ( has dropped pace ) , swing and seam , wicket taker but striking less maybe due to greatly reduced pace. Ishant - medium fast ( has dropped pace ), very idiotic, lacks control. IS THE PACE ATTACK LOOKING THE SAME AS THE RECENT PAST ?
vvvslaxman Posted October 20, 2013 Author Posted October 20, 2013 read the news on cricinfo that he is retained for next 4 matches. I completely lost interest in the ODI series.
goose Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 21. India get a taste of Instant Karma 22. Aussies feast on Chicken Shwarma
rkt.india Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 read the news on cricinfo that he is retained for next 4 matches. I completely lost interest in the ODI series. Same. I know if he is retained. He is going to play.
Old guy Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 read the news on cricinfo that he is retained for next 4 matches. I completely lost interest in the ODI series. I had no interest from start ..this is one *****y bowling squad .. The team that toured Zimbabwe will fare much better Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Vilander Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 Somebody was suggesting that we had done well with this bowling attack in the last year or so. Hence, we should be patient. We did not have the same bowling lineup really in the pace department. We had -- Umesh - genuinely fast , wicket taking , expensive BK - medium fast , swing and seam, wicket taking Ishant - fast medium, bouncy, idiotic We have -- Vinay - medium pace, expensive, non strike bowler, little swing, no bounce BK - medium pace ( has dropped pace ) , swing and seam , wicket taker but striking less maybe due to greatly reduced pace. Ishant - medium fast ( has dropped pace ), very idiotic, lacks control. IS THE PACE ATTACK LOOKING THE SAME AS THE RECENT PAST ? you are using medium fast and fast medium inter changably. fast>medium fast > fast medium> medium
Vilander Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 you are using medium fast and fast medium inter changably. fast>medium fast > fast medium> medium corrected myself, looks like yours is popularly held view. Wiki says this. Classification of fast bowlers[1] Type mph km/h Fast ≥88 ≥142 Fast-Medium 80-87 129-141 Medium-Fast 70-79 112-128 Medium 60-69 96-111 Spin Bowling <60 <96 There is a degree of subjectivity in the usage of these terms; for example, Cricinfo uses the terms "fast-medium" and "medium-fast" interchangeably
express bowling Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 you are using medium fast and fast medium inter changably. fast>medium fast > fast medium> medium First, FAST > FAST-MEDIUM > MEDIUM-FAST > MEDIUM Fast medium is quicker than medium fast. Second, I have not used the terms interchangeably. I am claiming that Ishant is bowling sl slower and is now medium-fast compared to his fast-medium pace earlier this year. Similarly, BK is bowling slower and is now medium compared to medium-fast earlier. P.s- I posted this before seeing your wiki post.
express bowling Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 corrected myself, looks like yours is popularly held view. Wiki says this. Classification of fast bowlers[1] Type mph km/h Fast ≥88 ≥142 Fast-Medium 80-87 129-141 Medium-Fast 70-79 112-128 Medium 60-69 96-111 Spin Bowling <60 <96 There is a degree of subjectivity in the usage of these terms; for example, Cricinfo uses the terms "fast-medium" and "medium-fast" interchangeably Practically we see approximately EXPRESS - 140 to 160 FAST. - 135 to 149 FAST-MEDIUM - 130 to 142 MEDIUM FAST - 125 to 137 MEDIUM - 120 to 129 MILITARY MEDIUM - 105 to 123 These are the pace ranges which when changed has some visually discernable difference and impact on the reaction of batsmen. Also, bounce should have a bearing on the classification of A pacer as bounce hurries batsmen too.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now