bulbul Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 You are more likely to die in a bomb blast in India than in Afghanistan. Strange as it may sound, government data show that India is among the most dangerous places in the world as far as bomb blasts per year are concerned - next only to Iraq and Pakistan, with even war-torn Afghanistan and Syria doing better. Latest data from National Bomb Data Centre (NBDC) show that India suffered 212 bomb blasts in 2013 — more than double of what Afghanistan (with 108 blasts) suffered. Facing internal strife, Bangladesh with 75 blasts and Syria with 36 blasts have done better. While the number of blasts in India decreased from 241 in 2012 to 212 in 2013, casualties went up with 130 deaths and 466 injuries last year as compared to 113 deaths and 419 injuries in 2012. Analyzing the frequency of IED blasts in the country over the past decade, the document says between 2004 and 2013 "there have been an average of 298 blasts and 1,337 casualties in India". This is again higher than Afghanistan which in the past five years witnessed a maximum of 209 such attacks in 2010, according to the data In fact, along with Pakistan and Iraq, India accounts for almost 75% of bomb blasts in the world An analysis of the attacks in India shows that its North East region (Assam and Manipur worst affected) and Maoist areas (Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand registering most blasts) have contributed to over 80% of IED attacks even though Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a 50% rise in bomb blasts last year as compared to2012. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-among-most-dangerous-places-in-the-world/articleshow/31357766.cms :((
CSK Fan Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Actually that just shows how less of a threat terrorism actually is on a gloal scale You reap what you sow touche'
moniker Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Silly TOI logic. How does more blasts equate to higher likelihood of dying in a blast? Are the populations of all 3 countries the same? The inability to prevent such a huge number of blasts is disappointing though.
NareshK Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 An analysis of the attacks in India shows that its North East region (Assam and Manipur worst affected) and Maoist areas (Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand registering most blasts) have contributed to over 80% of IED attacks even though Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a 50% rise in bomb blasts last year as compared to2012. These are in troubled areas and not in rest of 85 % of India.
Blue Star Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 [QUOTE]An analysis of the attacks in India shows that its North East region (Assam and Manipur worst affected) and Maoist areas (Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand registering most blasts) have contributed to over 80% of IED attacks even though Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a 50% rise in bomb blasts last year as compared to2012.[/quote These things can be easily controlled. Unlike pakis, it is no militant or Islamic jihadists which is far, far more dangerous than Maoists or separatists in north eastern part of our country.
beetle Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Getting killed in a blast is very unlikely.You are more likely to die in a road accident. You are more likely to be killed in rage incidents because you brushed someone's car...or parked in a wrong place. More likely to be killed by someone in the family because of a property dispute. more likely to get killed in a crime of lust or passion . Explosion????? very unlikey.
gs Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Should probably take this statistics with a pinch of salt, but still that's just too many blasts. The internal security infrastructure is probably the shyttiest in the world
velu Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 You reap what you sow Sorry to say this.. If its true then Pakistan is prepared for a healthy harvest
beetle Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 You reap what you sow Are you standing in front of a mirror?
Detonator Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 yes, we sowed a false and unfair ways of secularist agenda and paying the price for it. Gonna still pay for it until we have the so called Indians who sympathize the pakis.
sachin34357 Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Naxalite–Maoist insurgency has been going on for past 5 decades, since 2002, 2,000 security forces and 5,000 civilians have been killed. I wonder how many Indians know about Naxalite–Maoist insurgency.
The Outsider Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 ^ It is not cool to talk about them, because it does not involve bashing Muslims. Similarly it is fine if terrorists involved in killing CMs and PMs are let go, as long as they are not Muslims.
Detonator Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 The outsiders are most likely to get a higher form of punishment. The Outsiders shld stay away from the country, no matter what happens inside.
jf1gp_1 Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 i bet you are more likely to be shot in Detroit/st louis/philly than any indian city
vvvslaxman Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Few selective areas have contributed to this stat. No wonder Bhiar tops it.
gattaca Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 ^ It is not cool to talk about them' date=' because it does not involve bashing Muslims. Similarly it is fine if terrorists involved in killing CMs and PMs are let go, as long as they are not Muslims.[/quote'] Dude get a life.how many such articles are posted?regarding Ltte every one wanted them to be hanged. Get your head out of the sand. Stop playing the sympathy card always.
dial_100 Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Are you standing in front of a mirror? Oops, one last mirror was left in a court room in Islamabad. kabooom... BLASSST ... and thats gone tooo :((
Recommended Posts