Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
If kp agreed with the decisions' date=' why are the chuskis have their lungis in a twist?[/quote'] You can see how it is easier with lungis than with pants
Posted
You can see how it is easier with lungis than with pants
During 18 th century, our peeps wear lungi around shoulders. Westerners copied it and called it as cape.
Posted
whats wrong? You cannot play with 10 players. I dont see any problem. Opposite captain agreed too.
According to the commies (not the communists), you should replace PK either with a batsman or a quick/medium quick bowler, not a spinner. KP and Kirsten did argue over it until Kumble sorted it. Played Ojha, i.e.
Posted

Stop crying. ....rejoice the fact that we have one of the most passionate captains in the world..also kl.p. or dd did not have a problem.....why are u guys crying

Posted

^ They did have a problem. Both Kirsten and KP looked up to the MI players or staff and swung their hand in denial. It was overturned when Kumble and the match refree intefered.

Posted
According to the commies (not the communists), you should replace PK either with a batsman or a quick/medium quick bowler, not a spinner. KP and Kirsten did argue over it until Kumble sorted it. Played Ojha, i.e.
Shame on you Mr Kumble.Expected better from you!! Shame!!
Posted

well KP and Kirsten didn't agree, which is why there was a delay, but with cameras on them it looked like they were the ones causing trouble. question is why did the match referee agree to it?

Posted
Do you really think PK was injured? And why wasn't he replaced with a seamer? The pitch is assisting turn and they knew they will be bowling second hence opted for Ojha over PK.
If they did it on purpose then they wouldn't have picked PK in the first place. There have been many instances when players have got injured just before the game. Tiwary broke his shoulder in BD before his debut. Rohit got injured just before his test debut. Not first time this has happened. They did not have any other seamer in their team. The one they had has played 2 games in 3 years of IPL for them and is too inexperienced to be played in such a crucial game. Reason they played Ojha, Otherwise Ojha too has been really poor this IPL whenever he played. So do not see much reason to complain.
Posted
According to the commies (not the communists), you should replace PK either with a batsman or a quick/medium quick bowler, not a spinner. KP and Kirsten did argue over it until Kumble sorted it. Played Ojha, i.e.
There is no rule like that. A bowler is replaced with a bowler as they did not have any experienced Indian seamer, they went for a spinner and the same spinner himself had been poor in IPL this season.
Posted
I am not sure if it is allowed even in fantasy league let alone real match :cantstop:
I do not think its unfair. A team cannot play with 10 players.
Posted
bowling first PK would have been handy' date='but Rohit lost the toss and ........[/quote'] There is not much bowling first or 2nd at Wankhede. In fact, bowling second, bowl will do more for pacers as it cools down a bit.
Posted
I do not think its unfair. A team cannot play with 10 players.
10 players? How did he get injured after team was announced. Don't you think it can be misused by many teams I n futurre based on toss result
Posted
There is not much bowling first or 2nd at Wankhede. In fact' date=' bowling second, bowl will do more for pacers as it cools down a bit.[/quote'] You keep missing the point . Rules are not to be bent for no reason. You have an injured player after toss tough luck have a substitute fielder.
×
×
  • Create New...