Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, vishalvirsingh said:

i am talking about ignoring the SLOW Balls and his pacy overs average should be 136K

It's easier to bowl with high intensity and more effort when you're bowling only 4 overs.

Longer the format, more the pacer will return to his natural pace where his body is most comfortable with.

 

Arshdeep bowls fast only in death overs, but he is not a naturally quick bowler. Maybe at Jaydev's pace of 130-134...average pace around 132.

 

Harsha Patel is another example who can clock 140's effort ball in T20's...otherwise he is a 130-134 kph bowler.

Posted
9 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Sardarji has a natural bounce. Check the first ball in the video.In county he bowled a 15+30 over spells. 

 

 

First ball is a short ball. Doesn't mean anything. Natural bounce is when bowler gets bounce from back of length delivery.

Posted
12 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Sardarji has a natural bounce. Check the first ball in the video.In county he bowled a 15+30 over spells. 

 

 

Good. He may improve. If he can be consistent, I would get him in the first 11 for sena. 

Posted
On 6/24/2023 at 11:31 AM, wazza said:

Good. He may improve. If he can be consistent, I would get him in the first 11 for sena. 

 

Arshdeep is just about ok for T20s only.

 

His good length balls are pretty innocuous and a bowler must bowl a high percentage of length balls in tests and ODIs. 

Posted
On 6/9/2023 at 8:21 PM, Vijy said:

thakur is the closest we have for seam AR.

In the second innings vs Aus in WTC - thakur hardly got a long enough bowl to get wickets. BTW Shami's two wickets came at end when Aus was throwing bat around.

 

If you don't want a 4th bowler - just pick a batsman. Besides Rahane and maybe Kohli, no one else knows how to rotate the 4 pace bowlers.

 

After the Thakur 50 - he was basically overlooked for the bowling.

 

The treatment to Siraj and Thakur in T5 vs England when Bumrah was captain was worse. I mean I understand Bumrah and Shami are much better than Marshall and Holding and Siraj and Thakur are much worse than Croft and Garner but still.......

 

Compare I1 vs I2

 

Inning 1

Mohammed Shami 29 4 122 2 4.20 1 2
Mohammed Siraj 28.3 4 108 4 3.78 3 1
Umesh Yadav 23 5 77 0 3.34 0 0
Shardul Thakur 23 4 83 2 3.60 0 4
Ravindra Jadeja 18 2 56 1 3.11 0 0
 

 

 

 

Inning 2

Mohammed Shami 16.3 6 39 2 2.36 1 1
Mohammed Siraj 20 2 80 1 4.00 1 1
Shardul Thakur 8 1 21 0 2.62 0 0
Umesh Yadav 17 1 54 2 3.17 0 0
Ravindra Jadeja 23 4 58 3 2.52 0 0
Posted
11 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Why is Mukesh Kumar in the ODI snd T20I squads  ?   Based on what  !!

 

And Avesh makes a comeback.

 

This selection committee is very very poor when it comes to selecting pacers.

 

 

Absolutely, Mukesh has a poor record even in domestic white ball cricket. There is no sense of him in T20'.

Avesh is just ....even Khaleel is a better bet that him.

Harshit, Sen should have been there with one more tall quick (Hangargekar, Tyagi or Yudhvir) in place of 3 leggies (Axar is automatic pick due to absence of Jadeja).

 

 

Posted

Indian cricket seems to be going backward, tried and tested failures are always on the selectors radar, thought Rana, Yash were in the reckoning but no, really don't see the likes of Sen, tyagi, Mohsin, prasidh ever making it big.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...