singhvivek141 Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 8 hours ago, vishalvirsingh said: Akashdeep ... Any views about him He is a workhorse, came through ranks and has shown decent amount of performances in all 3 formats of domestics. express bowling and SRT100 1 1
singhvivek141 Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 11 hours ago, Sandz said: He looks like another Thukesh Kumar type of bowler, I don't have much hope in him. Where are the next Bumrahs and Shamis? I cannot believe talents like Tyagi have not been groomed at all, such poor management, it is mind boggling. They all debut at the age of 23-24. By the time they hit 26-27 they became experienced. Our current fast bowlers are debuting at age of 27-28..by the time they will gain experience they'll already be 30-31, and start to decline in two or three years. tweaker, Sandz and express bowling 3
Suhaan Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 30 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said: They all debut at the age of 23-24. By the time they hit 26-27 they became experienced. Our current fast bowlers are debuting at age of 27-28..by the time they will gain experience they'll already be 30-31, and start to decline in two or three years. Agarkar who himself debuted at young age in 90s when we had literally noone barring Srinath to bowl at bare minimum pace that too in India against a very aggressive Australian odi side in 1998 Wonder what someone like Agarkar thinks when we should be trying few when we have some good prospects unlike 90s Pacers always take time to get to their own in internationals more with Indian pacers Why are they giving late opportunities,even Mukesh got his chance in 30s express bowling and tweaker 2
Suhaan Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 6 hours ago, express bowling said: Absolutely ! Can't believe the myopic approach that this TM.and selectors have adopted regarding newer pacers. Don't know why no one is searching for the next Bumrah and Shami !! Bumrah was just a pleasant accident which happened to Indian cricket thanks to yet another gift from John Wright the foreigner for MI Although he came through FC since 2013 IPL is not the place to learn the nuances and skills of fast bowling They should have been promoted and marketed more by their regional cricket associations,UP cricket and other boards dont care about their brand rollingstoned, tweaker, Vk1 and 2 others 5
singhvivek141 Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 21 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Agarkar who himself debuted at young age in 90s when we had literally noone barring Srinath to bowl at bare minimum pace that too in India against a very aggressive Australian odi side in 1998 Wonder what someone like Agarkar thinks when we should be trying few when we have some good prospects unlike 90s Pacers always take time to get to their own in internationals more with Indian pacers Why are they giving late opportunities,even Mukesh got his chance in 30s I think of 2 reasons 1. BCCI's priority is not cricket but money. All they care about is IPL and its viewership, tournaments like SMAT, VHT, Ranji, Irani are hardly televised. Everything revolves around IPL now, even with the fans. 2. With no focus from BCCI, selectors don't have any ownership for their decisions. When there is no one to watch you, a sense of laziness and "don't care" attitude creep up. Coaches are given free ride and no one is serious enough to ask right questions. On top of it, now BCCI has shut the mouth of ex cricketers and media houses. Hence selectors while choosing a team just look for IPL teams and their domestic stats. They don't care if someone is a stat pad batter or a condition dependent bowler Vk1, SRT100, Suhaan and 1 other 1 3
Vk1 Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 (edited) yet another wc defeat..we produce lot of average cricketers.. very few become superstars.. and the crucial differentiator is - our average cricketers are pathetically poor compared to Aus/Eng avg cricketers.. that's why you see 6/7 wicket hauls from Steve O'keefe, Hartley, Azaz Patels etc while our even good bowlers tend to suffer overseas Edited February 11, 2024 by Vk1 Suhaan, SRT100 and Number 1 2
msb1991 Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 5 minutes ago, Vk1 said: we produce lot of average cricketers.. very few become superstars.. and the crucial differentiator is - our average cricketers are pathetically poor compared to Aus/Eng avg cricketers.. that's why you see 6/7 wicket hauls from Steve O'keefe, Hartley, Azaz Patels etc while our even good bowlers tend to suffer overseas Potentially - but also RP Singh was very strong in England 2007, Sreesanth was a lethal weapon in SAF, Siraj/Thakur became Test match winners in Australia with the ball and so sometimes it is horses for courses.
tapandrun Posted February 11, 2024 Posted February 11, 2024 (edited) Last 5/6 years looks like Ind is going pre-Ganguly captaincy era, where anyone and everyone was selected without any plan or potential. Low potential players with no intnl quality are being picked not sure why that is. there could be multiple factors. No one is questioning about team performances and goals overall. Players making back-door entries at the start of world event, high potential players are being ignored and not being groomed. Coach and selectors are retained because they are unable to find a new personal fr the job. Edited February 11, 2024 by tapandrun rollingstoned, singhvivek141, express bowling and 1 other 1 3
Suhaan Posted February 12, 2024 Posted February 12, 2024 11 hours ago, Vk1 said: yet another wc defeat..we produce lot of average cricketers.. very few become superstars.. and the crucial differentiator is - our average cricketers are pathetically poor compared to Aus/Eng avg cricketers.. that's why you see 6/7 wicket hauls from Steve O'keefe, Hartley, Azaz Patels etc while our even good bowlers tend to suffer overseas Present chairman of selectors orchestrated a win for the whole generation to savour in Australia by his stunning 6fer in Adelaide against a very strong batting unit Yes we have so many sides in our domestics which produces many average cricketers as well apart from few good ones,that's a drawback having so many sides Need to make the competition stiffer by reducing number of sides Even in IPL we will soon reach 12-15 sides in coming years express bowling, rollingstoned, Vk1 and 2 others 5
Vk1 Posted February 12, 2024 Posted February 12, 2024 23 hours ago, msb1991 said: Potentially - but also RP Singh was very strong in England 2007, Sreesanth was a lethal weapon in SAF, Siraj/Thakur became Test match winners in Australia with the ball and so sometimes it is horses for courses. our guys play 10x nbr of games compared to sena avg cricketers.. even if you compare your examples with mine.
Vijy Posted February 13, 2024 Posted February 13, 2024 On 2/11/2024 at 12:29 PM, Vk1 said: yet another wc defeat..we produce lot of average cricketers.. very few become superstars.. and the crucial differentiator is - our average cricketers are pathetically poor compared to Aus/Eng avg cricketers.. that's why you see 6/7 wicket hauls from Steve O'keefe, Hartley, Azaz Patels etc while our even good bowlers tend to suffer overseas they are bang average
singhvivek141 Posted February 13, 2024 Posted February 13, 2024 https://go.jc.fm/fRhd/lecif2x2 Himanshu's 5fer vs HP. Seems he is around 140's, but is tall and gets good bounce. Mosher and express bowling 2
Vijy Posted February 13, 2024 Posted February 13, 2024 1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said: https://go.jc.fm/fRhd/lecif2x2 Himanshu's 5fer vs HP. Seems he is around 140's, but is tall and gets good bounce. being 135-140 is enough with bounce
Suhaan Posted February 13, 2024 Posted February 13, 2024 4 hours ago, Vijy said: they are bang average Remember Sunil Joshi bang average cricketer played quite amount of cricket had 5/6 against SA express bowling 1
express bowling Posted February 13, 2024 Author Posted February 13, 2024 Himanshu Chauhan has 28 wickets from just 9 FC innings. More than 3 wickets per innings. That is just incredible for a debutant. Vijy, Lone Wolf, SRT100 and 1 other 2 2
express bowling Posted February 13, 2024 Author Posted February 13, 2024 4 hours ago, singhvivek141 said: https://go.jc.fm/fRhd/lecif2x2 Himanshu's 5fer vs HP. Seems he is around 140's, but is tall and gets good bounce. Himanahu was bowling faster in the earlier innings we saw. Looks 130 k to 140 k range here. Mosher 1
express bowling Posted February 13, 2024 Author Posted February 13, 2024 (edited) 36 year old Umesh, after 13 years in international cricket, bowling quicker and more aggressively in this Ranji Trophy than Mukesh, Unadkat, Avesh, Arshdeep are doing in international matches. https://go.jc.fm/fRhd/fkbc9yuy Edited February 13, 2024 by express bowling Vijy, SRT100, rollingstoned and 1 other 1 3
SRT100 Posted February 13, 2024 Posted February 13, 2024 14 minutes ago, express bowling said: 36 year old Umesh, after 13 years in international cricket, bowling quicker and more aggressively in this Ranji Trophy than Mukesh, Unadkat, Avesh, Arshdeep are doing in international matches. https://go.jc.fm/fRhd/fkbc9yuy Not surprising here, Umesh has a strong mature body compared to his colleagues. express bowling 1
Sandz Posted February 13, 2024 Posted February 13, 2024 1 hour ago, express bowling said: Himanshu Chauhan has 28 wickets from just 9 FC innings. More than 3 wickets per innings. That is just incredible for a debutant. He will get his chance in 7 years time, when his speed is down to around 130kph. Vijy and express bowling 2
New guy Posted February 13, 2024 Posted February 13, 2024 On 2/12/2024 at 2:30 AM, tapandrun said: Last 5/6 years looks like Ind is going pre-Ganguly captaincy era, where anyone and everyone was selected without any plan or potential. Low potential players with no intnl quality are being picked not sure why that is. there could be multiple factors. No one is questioning about team performances and goals overall. Players making back-door entries at the start of world event, high potential players are being ignored and not being groomed. Coach and selectors are retained because they are unable to find a new personal fr the job. Just shows how much a coach having free hand can affect a team, positively and negatively. The chappel era, the Shastri era and now the Dravid era. The mentality has flipped a 180 fom Kohli-Shastri combo to the current coach and captain. tweaker, singhvivek141, Vijy and 1 other 4
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now