Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

pace is okay if he maintains it throughout the day. In Duleep Trophy he was getting tired

he also has a well directed bumper..135k if he can maintain.shoudl work very well in SEN(-A) due to the variety he has..

left amm swing,bouncers,slowers,yorkers..

Posted
21 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

pace is okay if he maintains it throughout the day. In Duleep Trophy he was getting tired

i want him to work to bowl in 136 to 145 k range

Posted (edited)

145 is asking too much from him..injuries and inaccuracy will happen..as its not natural to him..

even maintainin 140 will be tough..

min 135k and occassionally 140s should be fine for him..but we need intent on thsoe 135k+ bowls too..no floaty stuff

Edited by Need4Speed
Posted
26 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

I will again say left armers are overrated for test cricket and not required especially someone who struggled to cross 135.

 

Agree strongly.

 

 

26 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Left armers are more successful in LOIs.

 

More successful in T20s. Need some pace in ODIs. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Need4Speed said:

145 is asking too much from him..injuries and inaccuracy will happen..as its not natural to him..

even maintainin 140 will be tough..

min 135k and occassionally 140s should be fine for him..but we need intent on thsoe 135k+ bowls too..no floaty stuff

It just my wish

Posted
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

 

Arshdeep should work on becoming a 132 k to 142 k type bowler. ( Not asking him to bowl 144 k+ )

 

He has bowled early 140s before and so it is possible for him.

If Boobie bhaiya can increase and reach upto 144 why not Arshdeep,he too should work hard increase a yard or two

He's taller,he certainly should

Posted
47 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

I will again say left armers are overrated for test cricket and not required especially someone who struggled to cross 135. Left armers are more successful in LOIs.

I wont generalize that much..but just dont take them because of angle..taken them if they are good bowler..there could be others but for ex..see Neil Wagner he did well for NZ..as he had this good short bowl ,mental strength and accuracy..

 

in the end if we have a goo dbowler,.be righty or lefty..shoudlnt matter..

Posted
48 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

I will again say left armers are overrated for test cricket and not required especially someone who struggled to cross 135. Left armers are more successful in LOIs.

If they bring it in(mandatory for left armers at pace),there is place for them, but certainly pace should be there as you can buy time in redball as a batsman

Posted

Ind played with just 1 specialist fast bowler in last 2 t20is in SA tells a lot about the selection and fast bowling picks made by the selectors in last 3/4 years.

They needed to bring-in Akash deep  outside from the selected 17 member squad for that Eng test series , dayal was to go to aus and instead went to SA 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, tapandrun said:

Ind played with just 1 specialist fast bowler in last 2 t20is in SA tells a lot about the selection and fast bowling picks made by the selectors in last 3/4 years.

They needed to bring-in Akash deep  outside from the selected 17 member squad for that Eng test series , dayal was to go to aus and instead went to SA 

 

It is the outcome of picking pacers by looking at their stats instead of their bowling style + stats.

 

They are picking too many medium pacers who look quite innocuous but pick wickets in domestic cricket because of low quality batsmsnship and because these pacers can bowl accurately if they are not attacked by top batsmen. 

 

If a medium pacer has to be picked then he must have some exceptional qualities to make up for his lack of pace. Just good stats won't do.

Edited by express bowling
Posted
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

 

It is the outcome of picking pacers by looking at their stats instead of their bowling style + stats.

 

They are picking too many medium pacers who look quite innocuous but pick wickets in domestic cricket because of low quality batsmsnship and because these pacers can bowl accurately if they are not attacked by top batsmen. 

 

If a medium pacer has to be picked then he must have some exceptional qualities to make up for his lack of pace. Just good stats won't do.

Bro Harshit bowled with Bumrah today..

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Bro Harshit bowled with Bumrah today..

 

 

I was expecting this.

 

7. Jadeja

8. Nitish 

9. Harshit

10. Bumrah

11. Siraj 

 

this is the bowling lineup I expect in Perth. Not fully my choice as I would replace Siraj with Akashdeep or Prasidh and Jaddu with Washington.

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
57 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

I was expecting this.

 

7. Jadeja

8. Nitish 

9. Harshit

10. Bumrah

11. Siraj 

 

this is the bowling lineup I expect in Perth. Not fully my choice as I would replace Siraj with Akashdeep or Prasidh and Jaddu with Washington.

 

 

 

Nitish is unlikely. Akashdeep might be preferred

Posted

Brilliant bowling from Haris Rauf and Spencer Johnson.

Rauf loves bowling in Australia. You need pace here, with the next worldcup in Southafrica will get an idea of his usefulness there later in the year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...