G_B_ Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 i think selectors are a bit wary from picking punkaj after a horror test debut. if he is picked and failed then the selectors will bear the brunt. Bumrah should have been chosen
BlueBee Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 Bumrah did pretty decent in the A tour to Australia.
Lord Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 i think selectors are a bit wary from picking punkaj after a horror test debut. if he is picked and failed then the selectors will bear the brunt. Bumrah should have been chosen He was unlucky in that Test:((
express bowling Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 Bumrah is the best fast bowling prospect for tests as of now.
G_B_ Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 He was unlucky in that Test:(( and i agree you know how public opinion is right? one more failure and our news channels with their plethora of experts simply waiting to make sensational comments would have rounded on the selectors. I think the best bet is to pick Punkaj for the home tests to see what he is capable of in an environment in which India can win. I guess the selectors went on seniority. Dhawal has played the most matches of the seamers barring Punkaj. This selection does not help Dhawal either. Rather than working on improving his game he will be sat on the bench or be a net bowler.
G_B_ Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 and for the next test i would like to see Umesh come into the fold. In place of Ishant. Will reserve judgement on Shami till after the test. But is there is not an improvement then he needs to be axed. India could also play Umesh Aaron Ishant and Shami alltogether seeing as our spinners are more than dud.
bowl_out Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 I don't see Dhawal playing... But bad choice nontheless... Heck, even Dinda would have been a better pick with his pace and triple jumps
JaFanatic Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 I don't see Dhawal playing... But bad choice nontheless... Heck' date=' even Dinda would have been a better pick with his pace and triple jumps[/quote'] No way
JaFanatic Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 Bumrah is the best fast bowling prospect for tests as of now. Dunno but he needs to be fit first
beetle Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 Kulkarni called up as replacement for Bhuvneshwar http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-india-2014-15/content/story/809471.html Is it the skinny boy quota..?
Texy Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 This is ridiculous....Pankaj Singh should've gotten another opportunity....How many chances did Ishant Sharma get over the years. Feck Kulkarni :mad:
asterix Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 This is ridiculous....Pankaj Singh should've gotten another opportunity....How many chances did Ishant Sharma get over the years. Feck Kulkarni :mad: Pankaj Singh is from Rajasthan which BCCI BAAP Srini doesn't likes...
rkt.india Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 Is Dhawal Kulkarni better than Ishwar Pandey and Pankaj Singh? Is it just "more FC experience" since other bowlers in our team are rookies? Whats the reason DK is next in pecking order for TEST MATCH selection? rkt - is DK mostly 128-132 guy? (esp. in his SECOND, THIRD spells in the day?) There's a reason why even Indian batsmen play Peter Siddle trundler better than Ryan and MJ. Aus will drop Siddle and get Hazelwood / Pat Cummins in the 11 during this series. Watch. He is 128-132 even in first spell. He isnt looking good at all, didn't do much against J&K too.
rkt.india Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 i think selectors are a bit wary from picking punkaj after a horror test debut. if he is picked and failed then the selectors will bear the brunt. Bumrah should have been chosen Bumrah is injured, not playing Ranji too.
Texy Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 Pankaj Singh is from Rajasthan which BCCI BAAP Srini doesn't likes... That makes sense. Bastard Srini and his cronies. Fecking Kulkarni, even if you light his a.s.s on fire, still won't go beyond 132. Even Dinda would've been a better choice than this ultra-trundler unadkat clone.
Old guy Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 That makes sense. Bastard Srini and his cronies. Fecking Kulkarni' date=' even if you light his a.s.s on fire, still won't go beyond 132. Even Dinda would've been a better choice than this ultra-trundler unadkat clone.[/quote'] since he is replacing bhuvan its understandable why he is first choice ahead of likes of dinda what happened to praveen kumar he still injured ?
BeautifulGame Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 That makes sense. Bastard Srini and his cronies. Fecking Kulkarni' date=' even if you light his a.s.s on fire, still won't go beyond 132. Even Dinda would've been a better choice than this ultra-trundler unadkat clone.[/quote'] Kulkarni is from Mumbai and Srini hates them more lol
asterix Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 Kulkarni is from Mumbai and Srini hates them more lol That's Dhobi the comeback captain for you... Dhobi too dictating the selection, always going for trundlers for the safety of his hands...
rkt.india Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 That's Dhobi the comeback captain for you... Dhobi too dictating the selection' date=' always going for trundlers for the safety of his hands...[/quote'] All are trundlers left at home.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now