Jump to content

India might have peaked too early


Recommended Posts

Posted

If we had Vijay and Aaron in the squad, it would have given Dhoni a lot of options .... For e.g. one of the struggling (relatively) batsmen could easily be replaced by Vijay, who showed great form in the test series against OZ. Shami+Yadav+Mohit+Aaron+Ashwin would have made a terrific attack, esp. against Asian teams, Zim, Ireland, etc. Now we have to hope that those in the 11 (including Rohit and Jadeja, along w/ Raina against good fast bowling sides) would be able to turn their "A" game on :nice:

Posted

I am surprised Vijay scored century against Johnson, Ryan Harris, Hazelwood but was unable to score 30/40 against Vinay Kumar? Is kumar a legend lol

Posted
I am surprised Vijay scored century against Johnson' date=' Ryan Harris, Hazelwood but was unable to score 30/40 against Vinay Kumar? Is kumar a legend lol[/quote'] Yes Vinne Kumar is a domestic bully.
Posted
All current teams have theirs. Aussies 2003 and 2007; WI 1979 and 1983 were the only nearly flawless teams ever in a WC. Think about what the weakness of the following teams are and compare them to ours. Bangla - Where do I begin? :haha: SA - Any explanations needed? Pak - Batting is a big weakness, so is fielding. If Misbah is removed, entire team will crumble. WI - Too dependent on one or two batsmen. Bowling is one of the worst. SL - Bowling is a clear weakness Aus and NZ are the ones with the least number of weaknesses in home conditions. India is clearly ahead of others. All teams struggle when one or two of the top order batsmen get dismissed cheaply especially while chasing, this problem is hardly unique to India.
Yes... I am talking about in ABSOLUTE terms. For India, the top 2 can get out very easily if there is decent swing. Kohli hasn't been Kohli exactly this tourney. So that's a concern.
Posted

I think the problem I see is that we have not learnt anything from the matches. We are persisting with Rohit and Jadeja in the name of "winning" combination and Jadeja being the mythical "match-winner". On the other hand teams like Pakistan have learned from their defeats. They replaced their openers with Sarfaraz and it is already paying them huge dividends. Might come back to bite us in the later stages.

Posted
I think the problem I see is that we have not learnt anything from the matches. We are persisting with Rohit and Jadeja in the name of "winning" combination and Jadeja being the mythical "match-winner". On the other hand teams like Pakistan have learned from their defeats. They replaced their openers with Sarfaraz and it is already paying them huge dividends. Might come back to bite us in the later stages.
Yes. But whom can we replace Rohit Sharna with. Didnt he just get a hundred against the ussies when rest of team crumbled.
Posted

We still have the obligatory Dhoni attempt at something completely different to look forward to. Will need to make it the final for that. What could it be i wonder...a surprise promotion?

Posted
We still have the obligatory Dhoni attempt at something completely different to look forward to. Will need to make it the final for that. What could it be i wonder...a surprise promotion?
Possible bowling by Virat Kohli or Rohit Sharma.
Posted
I think the problem I see is that we have not learnt anything from the matches. We are persisting with Rohit and Jadeja in the name of "winning" combination and Jadeja being the mythical "match-winner". On the other hand teams like Pakistan have learned from their defeats. They replaced their openers with Sarfaraz and it is already paying them huge dividends. Might come back to bite us in the later stages.
+++++100.
Posted
Yes. But whom can we replace Rohit Sharna with. Didnt he just get a hundred against the ussies when rest of team crumbled.
Its been 6 matches since that 100.
Posted
I think the problem I see is that we have not learnt anything from the matches. We are persisting with Rohit and Jadeja in the name of "winning" combination and Jadeja being the mythical "match-winner". On the other hand teams like Pakistan have learned from their defeats. They replaced their openers with Sarfaraz and it is already paying them huge dividends. Might come back to bite us in the later stages.
No they are being persisted due to lack of alternatives.Dont really want to see Rayudu n Binny playing atleast in Aus matches In Pakistan everyone was asking for Sarfraz from start.He was their big scorer recently.They lose and merely corrected their mistakes.
Posted
So' date=' time to drop him without a decent replacement in mind.[/quote'] Drop Rohit, open with Binny.Binny can make those 10-20 runs which Rohit has been making against big teams. Binny can bowl, incase the spinners get hit in knockouts.
Posted
No they are being persisted due to lack of alternatives.Dont really want to see Rayudu n Binny playing atleast in Aus matches In Pakistan everyone was asking for Sarfraz from start.He was their big scorer recently.They lose and merely corrected their mistakes.
Unless you play Binny as opener , you never know.Also the last I know, Rayudu has made a 50 in his last warm up game before the league began, so he is definitely in some sort of form. Pakistan was pushed to open with Sarfraz and it clicked off. Unless Dhoni takes that risk, it is curtains.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...