Mosher Posted January 14, 2017 Posted January 14, 2017 Kaul, Vignesh, Tiwary WTF are the selectors smoking? Piss poor selections for the practice matches followed by some more shitty ones. Going back to trundlers. express bowling 1
Sooda Posted January 14, 2017 Posted January 14, 2017 Bawne in for Tiwary would have been good Masquerade 1
express bowling Posted January 14, 2017 Posted January 14, 2017 1 hour ago, MultiB48 said: dont think selectors know who is quicker ,probably want to give chance to the older guys before moving on the the next one and want the newer ones to perform for another season before picking It is Vignesh's first season too....and he is as innocuous as they get. These games ( practice matches against England, Irani Cup etc, ) should be used for the development of players who have a realistic chance of representing India in the near future....but are used for placating Ranji performers without international potential atleast as far as seamers are concerned.
tweaker Posted January 14, 2017 Posted January 14, 2017 Why this love for Kaul,1st in A game & now in ROI squad express bowling 1
renjith Posted January 14, 2017 Posted January 14, 2017 Don't understand the logic behind selecting vignesh ahead of siraj. Siraj has more wickets with better avg and SR compared to vignesh in the current Ranji season. express bowling 1
SecondSlip Posted January 14, 2017 Posted January 14, 2017 Manoj Tiwary is not international class, poor selection. Deepak Hooda should have been picked in his spot express bowling 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 14, 2017 Author Posted January 14, 2017 Kaul Whats this obsession with trundlers , how difficult is to understand for selectors that these guys dnt stand a chance in International cricket. Hooda,iyer, bawane made more runs than manoj tiwary so what was the logic behind tiwary selection tweaker and express bowling 2
tweaker Posted January 15, 2017 Posted January 15, 2017 8 hours ago, SecondSlip said: Manoj Tiwary is not international class, poor selection. Deepak Hooda should have been picked in his spot Monoj or Saurabh Tiwary
rkt.india Posted January 15, 2017 Posted January 15, 2017 15 hours ago, Sooda said: Pankaj has been consistently amongst the top wicket takers, and was not given a fair chance when picked for test cricket. He deserves this even though he is not young Even Vinay, Dinda have also been among the wickets and they too didn't get fair chances in test cricket. Priority should be to give chance to players who have the tools to succeed in international cricket. Selecting players out of sympathy or to give Him a chance for the sake of it won't take our cricket anywhere. tweaker, Ankit_sharma03, Forever Indian and 1 other 4
CG Posted January 15, 2017 Posted January 15, 2017 This bunch of selectors are nuts. Hopefully Dravid and Kumble can interfere and get some good players on A tours . MCcricket 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now